Your tasks is to critically assess an Indigenous community-based public health intervention report. You will use the selected criteria provided in the Report Format Outline, Point E (below), so that you can learn from the wisdom of others who have taken a strengths-based approach.Word limit is 2000 words (not including references).Steps1. For guidance, refer to Evaluating Australian Indigenous community health promotion initiatives: a selective review (Mikhailovich, K., Morrison, P., & Arabena, K. (2007). Evaluating Australian Indigenous community health promotion initiatives: a selective review. Rural and Remote Health, 7(746). ) This is the primary resource for this assignment, read it.2. Choose an ethical guideline from Page 5 to use in your assessment, e.g. “Keeping on Track”. Keeping on trackChoose an appropriate and useful report on an intervention to assess from those listed on Pages 8-12. Hearn S, Wise M. Health promotion: a framework for Indigenous health improvement in Australia. In: R Moodie,3.4. Begin writing your report (as per criteria below).Report criteriaA. Intervention titleB. Description: Describe briefly the intervention in terms of who, what, where, when, and how.C. Background (Context): Provide a short background to the complex situation that was addressed by the intervention (use other sources in addition to the report you are assessing so that you can substantiate or call into question the claims that are made; you are writing a critical assessment).D. Rationale: Include a summary of the reasons why people think that this particular intervention was a good idea (you should research further if other researchers and practitioners agree or disagree with the people who designed, implemented and evaluated the intervention).E. Assessment: Consider the following criteria in your assessment of the intervention. (Be sure to provide a critical exploration of what each of these criteria mean and why they are important for evaluating interventions. Use more than one reference to explain each criteria; references can be found in background to weekly topics.)• Effectiveness: Did the intervention get the results that people had hoped for or not, e.g. where goals and objectives met?• Efficiency: Was there a good return of the time and money spent, or was there unnecessary waste?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here