You will be exploring a health problem in detail using a descriptive epidemiologic approach. The final product is a paper as outlined in Appendix 4 (p XXXXXXXXXX: #1-8) in your textbook. The model for...

1 answer below »

You will be exploring a health problem in detail using a descriptive epidemiologic approach. The final product is a paper as outlined in Appendix 4 (p 233-234: #1-8) in your textbook. The model for the organization of the project and paper is as follows:


Model for organization of paper – You may use bulleted and/or paragraph formats; use tables/graphs /illustrations where appropriate.


1. Define the problem (nature, extent, significance, etc.)


2. Describe the agent.


3. Describe the condition (briefly)


4. Examine sources for data on morbidity and mortality for the selected problem


5. Summarize these data on the distribution of the selected health problem according to the following factors, using tables, graphs, or other illustration whenever possible:


A. Host characteristics


1. Age


2. Sex


3. Nativity


4. Marital status


5. Ethnic group


B. Environmental attributes


1. Geographical areas


2. Social and economic factors


3.


a. Income


b. Housing


4. Occupation


5. Education


C. Temporal variation


1. Secular


2. Cyclic


3. Seasonal


4. Epidemic


D. Any additional characteristics that contribute to an epidemiologic description of the disease/health problem


6. Summarize any current hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the observed distribution.


7. List any principal gaps in knowledge about the distribution of the health problem.


8. Suggest areas for further epidemiological research.


[Taken & Modified from Appendix 4: 233-234]



Include citations and reference list using APA style.


Upload your final paper by Saturday. Once you have submitted your paper, please post an executive summary of your project as well as a final reflection regarding insight you gained, key concepts you would like to share with the group, frustrations, etc. regarding the project to the discussion board.



References


Friis, R. & Sellers, T. (2014).
Epidemiology for public health practice, 5th. ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishing.



Q1. Go to theCUNE Library, and select an academic article from Promed or a similar source that addressed a research question related to public health using one of the study designs discussed in this week.


After your review of the article, post your answers to the discussion board:


1. What was the research question or questions investigated by the researchers?


2. What was the study design used? Do you agree with the study design chosen? Please explain.


3. If you were interested in investigating the same research question, would you choose the same study design? Please explain why.


4. What were the main findings from the study?


5. Do you agree or disagree with the strengths and limitations noted by the researchers of the study. Please explain why? Would you include other strengths and limitations, if so which?


6. How would you use the knowledge gained from this study when studying other health problems or this health problem?



Q3. Once you have submitted your Descriptive Epidemiology Paper, please post the following:


1. An executive summary (no more than two paragraphs) of your Descriptive Epidemiology project


2. A final reflection regarding insight you gained, key concepts you would like to share with the group, frustrations, etc. regarding the project.


Note: An Executive Summary is a brief but comprehensive synopsis of your paper, similar to an abstract.



Q4. Submit Assignment: Article Review



This assignment is the same as what you posted on the Discussion Board with the addition of a citationand summary. This is simply where you will submit it for grading and feedback. Remember, although you don't have to submit the assignment until Saturday, you still must post it to the Discussion Board by Thursday.


Go to theCUNE Library, and select an academic article from Promed or a similar source that addressed a research question related to public health using one of the study designs discussed in this week.


Include in your review the following:


a. Article Citation (APA)


b. Summary of the article/research study


c. Responses to the following questions: [This section will be posted on the Discussion Board also]


1. What was the research question or questions investigated by the researchers?


2. What was the study design used? Do you agree with the study design chosen? Please explain.


3. If you were interested in investigating the same research question, would you choose the same study design? Please explain why.


4. What were the main findings from the study?


5. Do you agree or disagree with the strengths and limitations noted by the researchers of the study. Please explain why? Would you include other strengths and limitations, if so which?


6. How would you use the knowledge gained from this study when studying other health problems or this health problem?



Chapter Questions



Note: For Questions 1 & 2 – these are case-control studies (Ch 6)



1.

Use the following information to answer the questions below


A large medical center’s oncology program reported an increased number of cases of pancreatic cancer during a certain month. The hospital’s epidemiologist decided to research the problem. Tumor registry records were searched to identify all cases of pancreatic cancer during a five-year period; cancer patients were matched with patients treated for other diseases during the same five-year period. All subjects in the study were questioned about lifestyle factors including alcohol, tea, and coffee consumption. The resulting data are as follows:














































DATA




Cancer Patients



Other Patients




Men



Women



Men



Women



LIFESTYLE VARIABLE




Alcohol



185



120



270



260



Tea Drinking



140



110



230



225



Coffee Drinking



190



140



270



240



Note: Total number of male cancer patients = 200.



Total number of female cancer patients = 150.



Total number of male patients (other diseases) = 300.



Total number of female patients (other diseases) = 300.



Prior to answering the following questions be sure to construct a 2 x 2 table from the data above.


a. What is the cancer risk associated with alcohol drinking among males? Please calculate the Odds Ratio (OR).


b. What is the cancer risk associated with alcohol drinking among females? Calculate the OR.


c. What is the cancer risk associated with tea drinking among males? Calculate the OR.


d. What is the cancer risk associated with tea drinking among females? Calculate the OR.


e. What is the cancer risk associated with coffee drinking among males? Calculate the OR.


f. What is the cancer risk associated with coffee drinking among females?Calculate the OR.


g. What factor had the strongest association with cancer for both men and women?


h. Which if any factor(s) acted as a protective factor for either males or females?



2.
The association between job-related exposure to welding fumes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was explored in a case-control study. The following data were reported for 399 COPD patients: 42 currently employed as welders; the remainder had no occupational exposure. Among the 700 controls, 47 were employed as welders. Set up a 2 by 2 table and calculate the OR.



3.


Complete the following questions in your text book:


a. Ch 6: #11


b. Ch 6: #12


c. Ch 7: #7



Note: Questions 4& 5 refer to a cohort study (Ch 7)



4.
As an epidemiologist you are going to investigate the effect of a drug suspected of causing malformations in newborn infants when the drug in question is taken by pregnant women during the course of their pregnancies. As your sample you will use the next 200 single births occurring in a given hospital. For each birth a medication history will be taken from the new mother and from her doctor; in addition, you will review medical records to verify use of the drug. [N.B.: These mothers are considered to have been followed prospectively during the entire course of their pregnancies, because a complete and accurate record of drug use was maintained during pregnancy.]



The resultant data are:Forty mothers have taken the suspected drug during their pregnancies. Of these mothers, 35 have delivered malformed infants. In addition, 10 other infants are born with malfunctions.



Create a 2 x 2 table with the given data and then determine:



a.

The relative risk between exposure to the drug and malformation



5. Suppose for #4 that a relative risk of 0.5 had been found. Which interpretation might follow?


a. The risk of congenital malformations is half as high among users of the drug as among non-users.


b. The risk of congenital malformations is equal among users and non-users of the drug.


c. The risk of congenital malformations is twice as high among users of the drug as among non-users of the drug.


d. Use of the drug is a protective factor for congenital malformations.


e. A and D

Answered Same DayDec 25, 2021

Answer To: You will be exploring a health problem in detail using a descriptive epidemiologic approach. The...

David answered on Dec 25 2021
122 Votes
Q1. Go to the CUNE Library, and select an academic article from Promed or a similar source
that addressed a research question related to public health using one of the study designs
discussed in this week.
After your review of the article, post your answers to the discussion board:
1. What was the research question or questions investigated by the researchers?
To assess the relationship between practice-based evidence (PBE) and research-based
evidence (RBE) in The Guide to Community Preventive Services. In addition, the study also

interested in determining whether PBE and RBE differ in characteristics such as study design,
intervention type, setting, study location, and quality of execution (Vaidya, 2017)
2. What was the study design used? Do you agree with the study design chosen? Please explain
The study design used here is a randomized controlled trial study design and it seems to be
appropriate for this kind of study (Vaidya, 2017). Meta analysis was used to extract the data from
the articles and MANTEL-HAENSZEL test was carried out to test whether there is any
association between RCT studies and intervention programs (0 represents control studies and 1
represents the respondents who quit alcohol intake after attending the intervention program).
3. If you were interested in investigating the same research question, would you choose the same
study design? Please explain why.
Yes, the same study design, namely, randomized controlled trial study design was used
investigating the same research question. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a kind of study in
which people are allocated to difference groups at random to receive the one of listed clinical
interventions. One of these interventions can be taken as cases. The control may be a standard
practice and normally called as placebo (Vaidya, 2017)
4. What were the main findings from the study?
This study mainly focuses on the ubiquity and importance of PBE in Community Guide
systematic reviews of population-based public health interventions. The majority of PBE was
identified using the review process and the technique used was of high quality. This study
therefore demonstrates that PBE can be effectively incorporated into systematic reviews
alongside RBE (Vaidya, 2017)
5. Do you agree or disagree with the strengths and limitations noted by the researchers of the
study. Please explain why? Would you include other strengths and limitations, if so which?
The inclusion of multiple review of the same study is one of the major limitations of the study.
This indicates that some studies might be repeated at least once. However, each study contributes
independently to each review and thus should not bias the overall findings. The duration of the
articles used in this study might have more than 10 years and some study have their duration of
more than 50 years ago. For some studies, some text and reviews are not available due to longer
duration.
6. How would you use the knowledge gained from this study when studying other health
problems or this health problem?
This study shows the importance of Meta analysis and also demonstrates whether the PBE is
prevalent in public health literature, and both PBE and RBE have been well represented in The
Community Guide’s systematic reviews. Using the experience gained from this study, the meta
analysis will be conducted by selecting the studies with same time duration periods which will
have an unbiased analysis and findings. In meta-analysis, one of the ways of testing whether a set
of single studies are homogeneous is by means of the Q test. Cochran’s Q – value is used to test
for Heterogeneity. The table given below shows the information about the Cochran’s Q value
and the confidence intervals for effect sizes
Q3. Once you have submitted your Descriptive Epidemiology Paper, please post the following:
1. An executive summary (no more than two paragraphs) of your Descriptive Epidemiology
project
2. A final reflection regarding insight you gained, key concepts you would like to share with the
group, frustrations, etc. regarding the project.
Note: An Executive Summary is a brief but comprehensive synopsis of your paper, similar to an
abstract.
Executive Summary
Descriptive epidemiology is a kind of study that uses the data in a standard way of organizing
and analyzing to find the variations of disease frequency geographically over a period of time
and also helps to determine the variation in disease with respect to people characteristics. The
process is normally validated through data collection techniques in which it determines the
population health status, and then it decides to frame hypotheses regarding the disease cause and
escalate the information to the program planning and evaluation department (Timperio, 2006)
The next stage of descriptive epidemiology project is to make inferences about the cause and
effects of heath conditions, where the researcher must conduct studies to determine the
relationship between disease and the outcome of the disease. The two major study types which
will be very widely useful in descriptive epidemiology project are observational study and
experimental study (Dale, 2016)
Final Reflection
Descriptive epidemiology is a kind of study that uses the data in a standard way of organizing
and analyzing to find the variations of disease frequency geographically over a...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here