You have received this email as confirmation that you have received a reassessment for your Reflection Paper Students are to select from the three case studies on vUWS that were utilised throughout the semester and choose one to reflect on as per the requirements in the attached documents. Please ensure you select a different scenario from your first attempt. Your assessment will be loaded into turnitin to check for similarity so please do not copy or use another student’s assessment material. The due date information for this assessment is found on the assessment sheet attached to this email: 1. Due Date of your reassessment:Wednesday 12thth July 5pm Please note the following: · The re-assessment date and time is not negotiable. Late entry will receive an unsatisfactory grade. If you are ill you will need to apply for special consideration attaching supporting documentation. Assessment 2: Completion of Reflection on Clinical Practice Weighting: Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory Word count: 750 words Due Date: Wednesday 12th July 2017, 1700hrs Submission Details: Please submit to the reassessment reflection box on vUWS via turnitin Marking Criteria and Standards: See page 13-14. To receive a satisfactory grade for this assessment you need to be awarded satisfactory in 80% of the assessment criteria. Aim of this assessment Learning takes place through critical reflection by experience and exploration of theoretical knowledge. The assessment aims to enhance students’ knowledge and understanding of the benefits of reflecting on clinical practice and experiences to assist with the learning process. The insights gained through reflective practice promote student self-awareness and enable them to become critically thoughtful about their own readiness for the intensely personal nature of providing care Details Students will select ONE case scenario only to reflect on (please do not reflect on the same case study select a different one).. The three case scenarios are found in the assessment tab on vUWS. The case scenarios include: - MEDICAL EMERGENCY CALL (MET) - STAFF CONFLICT - MEDICATION ERROR Use the GIBBS Reflective Cycle (Gibbs, 1988) to complete the components below. It is a good idea to set the reflection paper out with the bold headings as your paragraph heading. 1. Description: Describe the case scenario that you have selected to reflect on, concentrating on the main details of who was involved, what incident occurred, and why the incident occurred. 2. Feelings: Describe what you were thinking and feeling initially when you were confronted with this incident in the CPU. Explain why you might have felt this way. 3. Evaluate: Make a judgement based on the positive and negative aspects of the scenario. 4. Analysis: Draw on academic sources to show why the incident occurred. 5. Conclusion: Describe the lessons you have learnt from this experience. 6. Action Plan: Describe what you have learnt from this experience and how it will help you improve practice in future scenarios. Note: · You must include a minimum of four references to support your reflective practice. · The reflection paper must be submitted through TURNITIN by the due date and time. Resources There are a number of textbooks and resources available through the Western Sydney University Library that may assist you. Please refer to the unit’s vUWS site for specific unit resources. Marking criteria and standards: Assessment 2 – Completion of Reflection on Clinical Practice To receive a satisfactory for this assessment you need to be awarded satisfactory in 80% of the assessment criteria Criteria Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 1. Description Describes chosen case scenario using the main details. The case scenario is described correctly using all three main details of who was involved, what incident occurred, and why the incident occurred. Description of the clinical scenario being reflected on does not include the three main details, or describes them incorrectly. 2. Feelings Description of thinking and feelings about the scenario, with an explanation. Describes thinking and feelings about the scenario using precise language, and detailed explanation for this reaction. Uses overly general language to describe feelings and thinking. Explanation for this reaction is simplistic or not given. 3. Evaluation Overall judgement or impression, and explanation using positive and negative aspects. Describes an overall judgement or impression of the experience. Explains this evaluation through discussing both positive and negative aspects of your experience with the case scenario. Does not describe any overall judgement or impression from the experience. Does not explain the evaluation using both positive and negative aspects and the explanation does not link to the evaluation. 4. Analysis Detailed analysis and identification of why the incident has occurred. Analyses why the experience occurred. Explains aspects of the incident drawing on academic sources. Does not analyse why the incident occurred. Explanation is not supported by academic sources. 5. Conclusion Suggestions for improving the outcome from this case scenario experience. Suggests possible actions that would be likely to improve the outcome from this case scenario experience. Does not clearly suggest any actions, or the suggested actions are not appropriate to the chosen scenario. 6. Action Plan Plan for future practice, identifying knowledge and skills to support this action plan. Clearly articulates what the student would do to prepare themselves for other scenarios in their future practice. Identifies new knowledge, skills or attitudes that will support the provided action plan. Little or no attempt has been made to create an action plan to inform future practice Little or no attempt has been made to identify new knowledge required to support the action plan. 7. Use of Academic Sources Use current, relevant and sufficient literature to support the reflection. Uses a minimum of 4 academic references to support the reflection (other than the GIBBS Cycle). These references are less than 7 years old. Adequate referencing to support the chosen case scenario. References follow current APA 6th Edition referencing guidelines Uses less than 4 academic references to support the reflection OR the references are greater than 7 years old. Frequent errors in referencing style. Inadequate or no reference list supplied to support the case scenario. 8. Presentation Academic writing and referencing. Legible presentation and structure of text with conventional spelling, grammar and punctuation. There can be some errors but the errors do not impede meaning and understanding. Non-conventional spelling, punctuation and grammar that impedes meaning and understanding. Comments: Lecturer’s Signature: Lecturer’s Name: Grade: Date:
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here