You are required to develop a written reflection in which you examine your perspectives on health, health as a ‘human good’, and how ethical perspectives may differ within a society or across...

You are required to develop a written reflection in which you examine your perspectives on health, health as a ‘human good’, and how ethical perspectives may differ within a society or across societies. Use Driscoll’s ‘What, So what, What now’ reflective cycle to structure the reflection. Choose one of these two options for the focus of your reflection: a) Why is it ethical for society to provide healthcare? b) Why does society expect healthcare professionals to act ethically? Ensure you use scholarly sources to support the ‘So What’ section and include all sources in the reference list (see information on reference style below).


APPENDIX 1:Assessment 1 - Written Reflection (mark out of 100 – weighted to 20%) Criterion High Distinction (HD) Distinction (DI) Credit (CR) Pass (PA) Not satisfactory (NN) No attempt (NN) Described the ethical topic and the ethical concepts. 17-14.5 14.4-12.5 12.4-11.0 10.5-8.5 8.4-0.5 0 Comprehensively and objectively describes the topic and relates the topic to the ethical concepts and principles. Carefully and objectively describes the topic and relates the topic to the ethical concepts and principles. Clearly and objectively describes the topic and relates the topic to the ethical concepts and/or principles. Basically and mostly objectively describes the topic and relates the topic to the ethical concepts and/or principles. Lacks detail. Does not demonstrate an awareness of/or demonstrates a limited ability to identify ethical concepts related to the chosen topic. The topic and/or ethical concepts have not been described. Analysed the topic and linked these to ethical concepts covered in weeks 1 - 3 42.0 – 35.5 35.4 – 31.5 31.4 – 27.5 27.0 – 21.0 20.9 – 0.5 0 Discussion of the topic demonstrates deep, critical, and mature insight into different ethical concepts, and what might contribute to those differences related to the chosen topic. Discussion of the topic demonstrates critical insight on different ethical concepts and what might contribute to those differences related to chosen topic. Discussion of the topic demonstrates insight on different ethical concepts and what might contribute to those differences related to chosen topic. Discussion of the topic includes some attempt to discuss different ethical concepts and how these relate to chosen topic. Discussion does not demonstrate an understanding of ethical concepts related to the chosen topic. The topic has not been analysed and/or the ethical concepts have not been discussed. Reflect on ethical concepts related to chosen topic. 25.0 – 21.25 21 – 18.75 18.5 – 16.25 16.0 – 12.5 12.25 – 0.5 0 Written reflection demonstrates mature insight into ethical concepts related to chosen topic. Written reflection demonstrates insight into ethical concepts related to chosen topic. Written reflection demonstrates an awareness into ethical concepts related to chosen topic. Written reflection demonstrates some awareness into ethical concepts related to chosen topic. Written reflection demonstrates limited insight into ethical concepts related to chosen topic. There is no reflection on ethical concepts related to chosen topic. Adhered to the required word length, was clearly written and APA referencing was applied 16-14.0 13.5-12.0 11.5-10.5 10.0-8.0 7.9-0.5 0 Assessment adheres to the required length, is written in a clear, cohesive, and scholarly manner, and applies APA 7th ed. formatting and referencing consistently. Assessment adheres to the required length, is written in a clear and cohesive manner, and usually applies APA 7th ed. formatting and referencing correctly. Assessment adheres to the required length, is written clearly, and mostly applies APA 7th ed. formatting and referencing correctly. Assessment adheres to the required length, is generally written clearly and applies APA 7th ed. formatting and referencing with some errors. Assessment is longer or shorter than the required length, and/or is not written in a clear manner, and/or does not apply APA 7th ed. formatting or referencing. There is no adherence to word length and APA referencing protocols. APPENDIX 1:Assessment 1 - Written Reflection (mark out of 100 – weighted to 20%)