Write a 2 essay that compares and contraststwo different schools of thought in human nature and behavior. Select two schools of thoughtfor your essay from this list.
- Behaviorism.
- Humanistic psychology.
Address the questions below to compare and contrast how your two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior differ from each other.
- What factors do the two schools of thought about human nature and behavior share with each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods?
- What factors distinguishthe two schools of thought about human nature and behavior from each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods?
Remember, the focus of this comparison essay iscomprehensive theories of human nature and behavior, andnotpsychotherapeutic techniques, for example, cognitive behavioral therapy or psychoanalytic therapy.
Additional Requirements
Length: 2 pages
References: At least 4references to this week’s readings
Formatting: Double-spaced lines followingAPA Style and Format; a title page, abstract, page numbers, or running head are not required
Font size and type: 12-point Times New Roman
11/1/2020 Comparing Two Schools of Thought Scoring Guide https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSY/PSY7115/200700/Scoring_Guides/u03a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2 Comparing Two Schools of Thought Scoring Guide Due Date: End of Week 3 Percentage of Course Grade: 5%. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Compare how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. 24% Does not compare how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. Compares how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods but the comparison is missing some of the key terms. Compares how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. Compares how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods supported with a rationale for the similarities. Compare how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. 23% Does not compare how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. Compares how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods but the comparison is missing some of the key terms. Compares how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods. Compare how two schools of thought about human nature and behavior are similar to each other in terms of their principles, values, subject matter, research approaches, and applied methods supported with a rationale for the similarities. Develop a summary analysis of the similarities and differences between two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior. 23% Does not develop a summary analysis of the similarities and differences between two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior. Develops a summary analysis of the similarities and differences between two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior but the analysis is vague. Develops a summary analysis of the similarities and differences between two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior. Develops a summary analysis of the similarities and differences between two selected schools of thought about human nature and behavior with supporting examples Address all components of prompt and use the assignment description to structure the text. 5% Does not address the assignment prompt. Writing lacks a clear purpose or message that inhibits effective communication with the intended audience. Addresses all components of prompt and use the assignment description to structure text. Appropriately addresses all components of the assignment prompt and uses the prompt to guide organization. Additionally, shares information relevant to all assignment components at a level that communicates clear meaning. Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings. 5% Does not synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings. Cites multiple sources with no clear indication of key themes or findings. Synthesizes multiple sources into key themes or findings. Synthesizes multiple sources into fully- developed key themes or findings that support a clearly discernable thesis or central idea of the work. 11/1/2020 Comparing Two Schools of Thought Scoring Guide https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSY/PSY7115/200700/Scoring_Guides/u03a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2 CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. 5% Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence. Apply the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, and tone. 5% Does not apply the standard writing conventions for the discipline. Applies writing conventions that are inconsistent with disciplinary standards or inappropriate for the intended audience. Applies the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, and tone. Exhibits strict adherence to the standard writing conventions for the discipline. Elements of structure, voice, person, and tone are well matched to the intended audience. Convey clear meaning through appropriate word choice and usage. 5% Does not convey clear meaning through appropriate word choice and usage. Clear meaning is inhibited by a limited vocabulary, vague or ambiguous word choice, or incorrect usage. Conveys clear meaning through appropriate word choice and usage. Conveys precise and unequivocal meaning through precise word choice and effective usage. Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting. 5% Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study and (or) fails to employ APA style and formatting. Communicates in a manner that is partly scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, but inconsistently employs APA style and formatting. Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting. Communicates in a manner that is completely scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members of an identified field of study, using APA style and formatting with few or no errors.