Word count: 1500 (+/– 10%). Content over 1650 words will not be marked by the assessor Aim of the essay The aim of this assessment is to identify and give an overview of the role of a nurse in...

Nursing in Australia


Word count: 1500 (+/– 10%). Content over 1650 words will not be marked by the assessor Aim of the essay The aim of this assessment is to identify and give an overview of the role of a nurse in Australia and relate this to strengths-based nursing wheel and person centered care. You will need to engage in a number of the tools you have learnt through this unit including writing skills, NMBA Code of Conduct, Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics and person-centered care. The task You are required to write an academic essay on the role of a nurse in Australia. Please identify 3 strengths-based nursing values and discuss how these relate to the collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse. Please also discuss how these values relate to person-centered care.  Requirements: · You need to draw from the work we have covered online and Canvas to help you write this essay. You need to refer back to the work we have completed on the role of the nurse in Australia, person-centered care and of course, the strengths-based nursing wheel. · This is an essay format so you will need to write an introduction, body and conclusion as per your learning in Weeks 3 & Week 6. Use the TEEL structure for the construction of your paragraphs.  · You need to include at least 6 references and ensure you use the correct APA 7th edition referencing style. It is expected that you have undertaken a simple literature search associated with strengths-based nursing and person-centered care (Swinburne library search engine or/and databases). · Please make sure you follow the assessment rubric for this assignment Presentation Guidelines · Use 2.5cm margins on each side of the page · Page orientation must be portrait · Double-space between lines · Do not include additional spaces between paragraphs or references · New paragraphs should be indented · Use 12 points Arial or Times New Roman font style · Do not include any pictures within your essay · Reference list to commence on a new page · Submit only a Word document · Do not include a title page · Please ensure you include an assignment cover sheet with your submission ‘How to ‘tackle’ your assignment: · Think about the assignment question · Do some light research – go through lecture notes etc · Plan: what do you want to write about in the different paragraphs of your essay? (main topic and subtopics) · See LAS · Literature search (6 references) · Read and take notes – follow your plan · Write a first draft (introduction and conclusion last) · Edit your draft Rubric NUR10002 Assignment Two NUR10002 Assignment Two Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAcademic Writing Use of TEEL (Topic, explain, evidence and link) in each paragraph. 10.0 to >7.0 Pts A / High Distinction Shows a polished and imaginative approach to paragraph writing. Proficient use of TEEL. 7.0 to >6.0 Pts B / Distinction Effective use of TEEL across paragraphs. Carefully and logically organised. 6.0 to >5.0 Pts C / Credit Shows attempt to use TEEL all across paragraphs. Shows organisation and coherence. 5.0 to >4.0 Pts D / Pass Poor/limited use of TEEL across paragraphs. Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner. 4.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail No use of TEEL or disorganised paragraph structure. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClarity of writing Clarity of Expression (accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation). Cohesive writing between pair. 10.0 to >7.0 Pts A / High Distinction Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. Clearly separates new ideas but links connected ideas of discussion. Excellent evidence of collaboration between group members to create cohesive essay 7.0 to >6.0 Pts B / Distinction Language fluent. Grammar and spelling accurate. Separate paragraphs evident on areas key area of discussion. Clear evidence of collaboration between group members to create cohesive essay. 6.0 to >5.0 Pts C / Credit Language mainly clear and fluent. Grammar and spelling overall accurate. Structure of the essay mostly separate paragraphs for each key point. Moderate evidence of collaboration between group members to create cohesive essay. 5.0 to >4.0 Pts D / Pass Meaning apparent but language not always fluent or clear. Grammar and/or spelling contains errors. Concepts or points are unclear. Minimal evidence of collaboration between group members to create cohesive essay. 4.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail (4-0 Marks) Meaning unclear and/ grammar and spelling contain frequent errors. Structure unclear. Submission was clearly written separately with no cohesion across the piece. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIntroduction Introduces key concepts and points to be addressed throughout essay. 10.0 to >7.0 Pts A / High Distinction The context of the essay is clear. A sophisticated approach to the key ideas are introduced and defined. Overview of paper disuccesd. 7.0 to >6.0 Pts B / Distinction Introduction to topic. Scope and context of paper clearly defined. Overview of paper addressed. 6.0 to >5.0 Pts C / Credit Introduction states the topics of the essay. Scope and context of paper could be clearer. 5.0 to >4.0 Pts D / Pass (2.5 Marks) Introduction too long or too short. Some material in introduction belongs in main text. Focus and/or scope unclear. 4.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail No introduction or introduction is rambling and unfocused or introduction is incomplete. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBody Body of the essay discuss the role of a role of a nurse in Australia. Clear identification of 3 strengths-based nursing values and how these relate to the collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse. 30.0 to >23.0 Pts A / High Distinction Comprehensive description of the role of the nurse in Australia. Appropriate SBN values identified and creatively incorporated to link to the collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse, and person-centred care. 23.0 to >20.0 Pts B / Distinction The body is clearly defined and outlines the role of the nurse in Australia. Clearly interweaves the SBN values, collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse, and person-centred care throughout the body of the essay. 20.0 to >17.0 Pts C / Credit Body somewhat clearly describes the role of the nurse in Australia. Some attempt at interweaving SBN values, collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse, and person-centred care throughout the body of the essay. 17.0 to >14.0 Pts D / Pass Body too long or too short. No clear definition of the role of a nurse in Australia. Limited attempt at inclusion of SBN values, collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse, and person-centred care. 14.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail Incomplete or inaccurate definition of the role of a nurse in Australia. No attempt at interweaving SBN, person-centred care and collaborative partnership between the patient and the nurse. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion Summation of key concepts discussed in the body. No introduction of new information. 10.0 to >7.0 Pts A / High Distinction A succinct summation of the key points and body. No new information presented. 7.0 to >6.0 Pts B / Distinction Provides a well-constructed and accurate summation of the key points and body. No new information presented. 6.0 to >5.0 Pts C / Credit Provides an accurate summation of the discussion and body. No new information presented. 5.0 to >4.0 Pts D / Pass Limited summation of the body and or includes new information in the conclusion. 4.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail Incomplete or inaccurate summation of the body. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeReferencing (10 marks) Follows APA style (7thed.). Use of literature and evidence of reading. References no earlier than 2010 to ensure up to date and best practice included. Use of only primary research as sources. 10.0 to >7.0 Pts A / High Distinction Has developed and justified ideas based on a wide range (6 or more) and high quality of sources, which have been thoroughly analysed, applied and discussed. Uses own words to discuss ideas from the literature. No evidence of plagiarism. Adherence to APA style (7th ed.) with no errors in text or reference list. 7.0 to >6.0 Pts B / Distinction Able to critically appraise the literature gained from an adequate variety of quality sources (4 – 6). Mainly uses own words to express ideas – very good level of summary and paraphrasing. No evidence of plagiarism. Adherence to APA style (7th ed.) with minor errors in text or reference list. 6.0 to >5.0 Pts C / Credit Clear evidence and application of an adequate number (3 -4) of appropraite readings relevant to the subject; does not go beyond the core literature outlined in readings. Some problems with paraphrasing and expressing ideas from the literature. Mostly adhered to APA style (7th ed.) with minor errors either in text or reference list. 5.0 to >4.0 Pts D / Pass Literature is presented uncritically such that it demonstrates a limited understanding of the evidence. Less than 3 references of appropriate quality. Poor paraphrasing with too much reliance on words verbatim from literature. Needs assistance to avoid deliberate plagiarism. Minor errors in reference list and in text. 4.0 to >0 Pts E / Fail Either no evidence of literature being consulted or use of irrelevant, old or very small number of sources. Evidence of plagiarism. Omission or major errors in reference list. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation of assignment (5 Marks) Assignment presentation follows instructions presented as outlined on Canvas. 5.0 to >3.5 Pts A / High Distinction Assignment adheres to all presentation guidelines as outlined on Canvas. 3.5 to >3.0 Pts B / Distinction Assignment adheres to most presentation guidelines as outlined on Canvas. 3.0 to >2.5 Pts C / Credit Assignment adheres to some presentation guidelines as outlined on Canvas. . 2.5 Pts D / Pass Assignment shows limited adherence to presentation guidelines as outlined on Canvas. 2.5 to >0 Pts E / Fail No use of TEEL or Disorganised. 5.0 pts Total points: 85.0