William Carlton was the sole shareholder in ten New York City corporations, including Seon Cab Corporation. Each corporation owned two taxicabs, and each cab was covered by the minimum $10,000.00...


 William Carlton was the sole shareholder in ten New York City corporations, including Seon Cab Corporation.  Each corporation owned two taxicabs, and each cab was covered by the minimum $10,000.00 automobile liability insurance required under New York State law.  A taxicab owned by Seon Cab Corporation struck and severely injured John Walkovsky, who sued for damages.


Walkovsky named all ten corporations, Carlton individually, as well as the individual driving the cab that hit him, as defendants.  The plaintiff alleged that the corporations, although seemingly independent of one another, operate as a single entity, unit and enterprise with regard to financing, supplies, repairs, employees, and garaging.  The plaintiff asserted that the multiple corporate structure constituted an unlawful attempt to defraud members of the general public who might be injured by the cabs.  He sought to hold Carlton, the sole shareholder of each corporation, personally liable for his injuries.


1.  Is there any theory under which Carlton, the sole shareholder of a corporation, could be held personally liable?  Explain.




Jun 04, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here