What are the mental and physical risks of misuse OR abuse OR long term use of methamphetamine on people who have a mental health issue?How does methamphetamine impact the person’s recovery and mental...

1. 
   

   
   What are the mental and physical risks of misuse OR abuse OR long term use of
   
   methamphetamine
   
   on people who have a mental health issue?
   

   
   


2. 
   

   
   How does
   
   methamphetamine
   
   impact the person’s recovery and mental health treatment outcomes?
   

   
   


3. 
   

   
   Describe the treatment & management options of problematic use of
   
   methamphetamine
   
   patients with mental illness.
   

   
   


4. 
   

   
   Include introduction and conclusion
   

   
   

9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2 https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/727895 2/4 Criteria Ratings style Adheres to style requirements; including use of assignment guidelines; such as word limit, double- spacing, use of header & footer, page numbers, and size-12 font 1 Pts HD All style requirements and assignment guidelines adhered to. 0.7 Pts D The majority of style requirements have been adhered to, although there are still some minor formatting errors. 0.6 Pts C You have met the assignment guidelines satisfactorily, although you have not followed two or more of the required criteria. 0.5 Pts P You have adhered to the style requirements at a basic level although you have not followed the guidelines fully. Word limit not adhered to. Some basic formatting requirements not included; such as page numbers, headings, double spacing, font size readable. 0 Pts F You have not adhered to the style requirements in accordance with the assignment guidelines. No double spacing. Font size incorrect, making it difficult to read. Word limit not adhered to. No page numbers. No use of headings to guide the reader. academic writing Spelling, grammar and paragraph structure meets academic standards 3 Pts HD Excellent paragraph structure. Professional language used throughout, with well- defined terms. 2.5 Pts D You have generally met the academic standards for writing, with few spelling and punctuation errors evident. Your paragraph structure is good, with good use of professional language. You still need to consistently define terms 2 Pts C Your submission reads well, though some sentences are a bit confusing and/or rambling. You use professional language well, but still need to define some terms. Your paragraphs need to each have a key idea or focus, which then links to the next logically, enabling a flow of information. 1.5 Pts P There are a number of spelling and grammatical errors throughout, which detract from your content and flow of ideas. Terms are inadequately defined throughout, with your use of professional language limited. Paragraphs are not structured correctly, with too much use of point form in your responses. You need to review correct paragraph structure and its use in academic writing. 1 Pts F Many spelling and punctuation errors. Sentence structure is often unclear. No use of meaningful paragraphs to allow logical flow of content. Poor use of professional language. No definition of terms. You need to consult with the Study and Learning Centre for assistance with writing skills; before completing any further academic writing assessments. 0 Pts F Many spelling and punctuation errors. Sentence structure is often unclear. No use of meaningful paragraphs to allow logical flow of content. Poor use of professional language. No definition of terms. You need to consult with the Study and Learning Centre for assistance with writing skills; before completing any further academic writing assessments. responses to the questions Provides a comprehensive response to the criteria and analysis of the topic 25 Pts HD You have comprehensively answered the question to a high standard of detail. 22.5 Pts HD You have comprehensively answered the question to a high standard of detail. 21.25 Pts D You have answered the question well, and in appropriate detail. You could have provided more detail in some areas. 18.75 Pts D You have answered the question well, and in appropriate detail. You could have provided more detail in some areas. 16.88 Pts C Your answer is satisfactorily researched, and addresses the key criteria. When you focus on only one or two key points, you need to justify this and also briefly list the other points not covered in detail. 15 Pts C Your answer is satisfactorily researched, and addresses the key criteria. When you focus on only one or two key points, you need to justify this and also briefly list the other points not covered in detail. 13.75 Pts P Your response to the question is answered to an adequate level only, and require more detail and also to be applied more specifically to the questions 12.5 Pts P Your response to the question is answered to an adequate level only, and require more detail and also to be applied more specifically to the questions 6.25 Pts F The question is inadequately answered. Poor understanding of the question. You have not provided rationales for the points that you identify. Your response is too general and not focused on the question. 2.5 Pts F The question is inadequately answered. Poor understanding of the question. You have not provided rationales for the points that you identify. Your response is too general and not focused on the question. Noor Noor Noor 9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2 https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/727895 3/4 Criteria Ratings evidence based responses Effectively links evidence- based information to the analysis 10 Pts HD You effectively linked quality research based evidence to justify each of your rationales. 8.67 Pts HD You effectively linked quality research based evidence to justify each of your rationales. 8 Pts D You provide good evidence for most of your rationales; although you need to be more consistent with your level of research. 7.33 Pts D You provide good evidence for most of your rationales; although you need to be more consistent with your level of research. 6.67 Pts C The references used provide adequate evidence for your response, but you have not searched widely enough in some areas. 6 Pts C The references used provide adequate evidence for your response, but you have not searched widely enough in some areas. 5.67 Pts P Your use of evidence- based information is limited to the course textbooks, and reflects inadequate research. You have met the reference requirements at a basic level only. 5 Pts P Your use of evidence- based information is limited to the course textbooks, and reflects inadequate research. You have met the reference requirements at a basic level only. 3.33 Pts F Poor use of evidence to support your response. Your lack of supporting evidence indicates inadequate research into the topic question. No or inadequate references cited throughout your paper. References used are not contemporary or reflective of current practice. 1.33 Pts F Poor use of evidence to support your response. Your lack of supporting evidence indicates inadequate research into the topic question. No or inadequate references cited throughout your paper. References used are not contemporary or reflective of current practice. reference recency Utilises relevant and contemporary references in response 2 Pts HD You have provided an excellent list of references; with the majority of references 1.4 Pts D You have provided a relevant list of references; though you still need to ensure that the majority of references used are contemporary and peer reviewed. 1.2 Pts C References used reflect adequate research into the topic, although your use of web- based information does not adhere to the case study guidelines. You need to use more evidence-based peer reviewed journals. 1 Pts P Some references used are older than 10 years. You have overused non peer-reviewed and web- based information, which does not lend credibility to your responses. 0 Pts F Many of your references are older than 10 years. Many of your references are web-based and are not peer reviewed. intext referencing Intext referencing used throughout. Referencing formatted in accordance with APA requirements 5 Pts HD Your intext referencing and final reference list demonstrate a high level of consistency and are formatted correctly and according to APA guidelines. 4.16 Pts D Your use of intext referencing is good, and generally consistent. Reference list indicates good use of APA guidelines for most reference citations. Please read comments made throughout which indicate where improvements can be made. 3.34 Pts C Intext referencing is used throughout, but is inconsistent. You need to review the use of quotes and paraphrasing intext. Your use of et al. is incorrect. Your reference list is not in alphabetical order. You must review the APA guidelines. 2.5 Pts P You have not been consistent in your citation of references throughout this paper. You have not formatted your intext referencing according to APA. Your reference list is not formatted correctly. Your reference list is missing some information, and does not adhere completely to APA requirements. 1.66 Pts F Formatting of intext references incorrect and not according to APA requirements. Reference list is incomplete and is not formatted according to APA requirements. Your reference list does not meet the referencing requirements of the Discipline of Nursing & Midwifery, as outlined in the Style Guide. 0 Pts F Formatting of intext references incorrect and not according to APA requirements. Reference list is incomplete and is not formatted according to APA requirements. Your reference list does not meet the referencing requirements of the Discipline of Nursing & Midwifery, as outlined in the Style Guide. introduction Topic is introduced clearly and succinctly 2 Pts HD You provide an excellent introduction to your submission, and clearly explain how you intend to answer the case study question. 1.5 Pts D Your general introduction is good, with a clear summary of the key points to be covered. 1.2 Pts C You introduce the case study well, making clear links to the topic question. You have not stated clearly enough how you intend to set out your response. 1 Pts P Your introduction is only a restatement of what the case study is about, and doesn’t adequately state how you are going to set out your response to the question. 0.5 Pts F Your introduction is either absent or too brief, and doesn’t state what you intend to cover in your submission. 0 Pts F Your introduction is either absent or too brief, and doesn’t state what you intend to cover in your submission. Noor Noor 9/27/22, 7:40 PM Assessment task 2 https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/91258/assignments/727895 4/4 Total p Criteria Ratings Conclusion Conclusion provides a concise summary of main points covered 2 Pts HD Your conclusion provides a high quality summary of the major points covered in your responses, all linked well to the case study. 1.5 Pts D You summarise the main components of your responses, but need to link them more consistently to the case study. 1.2 Pts C You sum up the major focus of the case study satisfactorily, but need to also contextualise the key points of your responses to the case study. 1 Pts P Concluding comments are too brief, and do not summarise the main components of your paper adequately. 0.5 Pts F No conclusion is evident. You have not summarised the main components of your paper. 0 Pts F No conclusion is evident. You have not summarised the main components of your paper. Noor Noor