Weighting: 50% Word count: 2000 words Aim of Assessment The purpose of this assessment task is to provide students with the opportunity to compare and critically analyse the impact of current and...

Weighting: 50% Word count: 2000 words Aim of Assessment The purpose of this assessment task is to provide students with the opportunity to compare and critically analyse the impact of current and historical events, health care policies and service provision on the health of 1).Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 2).Asian immigrants DETAILS: Construct an essay that compares two (2) culturally diverse groups, 1). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and 2).Asian immigrants • Current and historical events and how they have impacted on known risk factors in each cultural group .1. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.2. Asian immigrants. • How health care policies and service provision have influenced health outcomes for each cultural group.1. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.2. Asian immigrants • Well researched – you must refer to AT LEAST: ten (10) relevant and current sources to support your ideas including articles from peer reviewed journals identified from relevant electronic databases such as CINAHL and MEDLINE, recommended text books and relevant texts from library shelves. Used references which must be published after 2011. And you can write historical events with references before 2011. • Acknowledge all the sources of information within the essay (in-text referencing) and in a Reference List at the end of your essay. a) Ensure you have created a reference list not a bibliography. A bibliography contains all readings done in preparation for writing an essay. However, only material that is cited in text in your assignment should appear in the final reference list. References must be correctly and adequately given in the American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.) referencing style as per the Western Sydney University (2014) American Psychological Association referencing style guide, which is available from: http://library.westernsydney.edu.au/main/sites/default/files/pdf/cite_APA.pdf • Appropriately expressed – you should write clearly using a formal academic style, and ensure grammatical accuracy. Assessment should be accordance to marking Criteria and Standards: Assessment which is as follows: Criteria: 1.Demonstrate scholarship in the construction and presentation of essay. Consistent high level of presentation of work. Publishable standard that demonstrates scholarship in the construction and presentation of the essay. Development of ideas extends beyond given question; argument is well-developed and original. Consistent APA style both in text and reference list with no erroes.conventional spelling grammar and punctuation with no errors. Criteria: 2.Knowledge of events and policies and their impact on the two culturally diverse groups. Impressive and original depth of understanding of the impacts of the relevant events and the policies is displayed. Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of all aspects of the topics evident in your assignment. Information is gathered from a wide range of current and relevant sources beyond the core materials. Criteria: 3.Critical analysis that includes a comparison of the two culturally diverse groups. Depth and breadth of critical analysis, extensive evidence from the literature and effective use of examples reflect an excellent understanding of the assignment topic. Articles for aboriginal and torres strait islander REFERENCES FOR ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER 1) Griffiths, K., Coleman, C., Lee, V., & Madden, R. (2016). How colonisation determines social justice and Indigenous health—a review of the literature. Journal of Population Research, 33(1), 9-30. DOI: 10.1007/s12546-016-9164-1 2) Marmot, M. (2011). Social Determinants and the Health of Indigenous Australians. Aboriginal & Islander Health Worker Journal, 35(3), 21-22. 3) Mazel, O. (2016). Self-Determination and the Right to Health: Australian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services. Human Rights Law Review, 16(2), 323-355. DOI: 1