We strongly advise you read the ‘Ask an Assessment Task Question’ discussion forum. If you don’t you may not fully understand the requirements of this task. In the essay you must offer a “balanced...

1 answer below »
We strongly advise you read the ‘Ask an Assessment Task Question’ discussion forum. If you don’t you may not fully understand the requirements of this task. In the essay you must offer a “balanced view” of the topic, which means that you must include alternative ethical perspectives that may not match your ultimate ethical stance but require consideration. You are not being asked to write an unsubstantiated opinion piece but are developing a logical evidenced ethical position. 1. Start with a clear introduction that tells the reader what to expect. A good introduction contains: • Some brief background information on the ethical importance of the topic. • A clear thesis-statement, where you tell the reader briefly where your ultimate ethical stance on the issue. Frame this in a way which ‘advises the reader where your argument is going to end up’ - for example “A range of ethical arguments will be presented to support the assertion that…..” (Note: You should not even determine your ethical stance (intro & conclusion) until you have written the body of your essay. Don’t go in with pre-conceived assumptions). 2. The body of your essay: • This is where you explore in detail how each of the bioethical principles relates to the topic of your essay. This may ultimately support your central argument, or it may be presenting alternate/opposing views (all should be included). i. Autonomy: Is the patient’s autonomy being respected or not? Can it be respected? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? ii. Beneficence: Is the intention to achieve the best possible outcome for the patient? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? iii. Non-Maleficence: Is un-necessary harm to the patient being avoided? Is it necessary to ‘harm’ the patient? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? iv. Justice: Are patients receiving equitable care regarding their needs and the available resources? Are there valid reasons for treating certain patients inequitably? • In the body of the essay, you also need to include discussion of other ethical concepts such as human dignity, veracity, codes of ethics, and professional codes of conduct. Ideally, these are integrated through the discussion. • At some point you will have to justify the values judgment that you make in determining what takes ethical precedence, and why you may have to compromise on any of the four bioethical principles. This is where the other ethical theories become useful. i. Utilitarian thinking: Are you aiming for the best possible outcome for the greatest good/benefits for the greatest number? Can you demonstrate ethically that it is, indeed, a “good” outcome? ii. Deontological thinking: Is there a duty or rule that necessitates or forbids a particular type of action? Can you explain why this duty exists? iii. Virtue-Ethics thinking: Does the proposed action conform to what we might expect of the moral character virtues of health-care professionals? iv. Ethics-of-Care thinking: Is the patient being consulted with a benevolent attitude, and is there sufficient dialogue with the patient to work out what is morally best in his or her specific situation? Is there potential for conflict with any general rules of moral conduct? v. Natural Law: Are there applicable universal and objective moral norms to which each person, when acting reasonably and responsibly, should respond? 3. Your conclusion should summarise and round-off your discussion on the topic. You should: • Concisely summarise how your ideas collectively support your ethical stance • State your ethical stance. Frame this in stronger language than in the introduction - for example “…as demonstrated in the ethical arguments presented, it is/is not....”. • offer some brief concluding remarks on the topic.


HLSC220 Healthcare Ethics Assessment Task 3 Written Essay Topics – Semester 2, 2023 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Australia should adopt a user-pays approach to healthcare for non-emergency health interventions. 2. Artificial intelligence robots should be used to provide social support for residents of aged-care facilities. 3. Access to healthcare should be restricted for people that do not participate in a national vaccination program. 4. Advance care directives should be mandated for all persons registered under Medicare. Essay TOPICS v.1.1 06.06.23 Essay TOPICS v.1.1 06.06.23 HLSC220 Healthcare Ethics Assessment Task 3 Written Essay Topic s – Semester 2 , 2023 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Australia should adopt a user - pays approach to healthcare for non - emergency health interventions. 2. Artificial intelligence robots should be used to provide social support for r esidents of aged - care facilities. 3. Access to healthcare should be restricted for people that do not participate in a national vaccination program. 4. Advance care directives should be mandated for all persons register ed under Medicare . Essay TOPICS v.1.1 06.06.23 HLSC220 Healthcare Ethics Assessment Task 3 Written Essay Topics – Semester 2, 2023 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Australia should adopt a user-pays approach to healthcare for non-emergency health interventions. 2. Artificial intelligence robots should be used to provide social support for residents of aged-care facilities. 3. Access to healthcare should be restricted for people that do not participate in a national vaccination program. 4. Advance care directives should be mandated for all persons registered under Medicare. We strongly advise you read the ‘Ask an Assessment Task Question’ discussion forum. If you don’t you may not fully understand the requirements of this task. In the essay you must offer a “balanced view” of the topic, which means that you must include alternative ethical perspectives that may not match your ultimate ethical stance but require consideration. You are not being asked to write an unsubstantiated opinion piece but are developing a logical evidenced ethical position. 1. Start with a clear introduction that tells the reader what to expect. A good introduction contains: • Some brief background information on the ethical importance of the topic. • A clear thesis-statement, where you tell the reader briefly where your ultimate ethical stance on the issue. Frame this in a way which ‘advises the reader where your argument is going to end up’ - for example “A range of ethical arguments will be presented to support the assertion that…..” (Note: You should not even determine your ethical stance (intro & conclusion) until you have written the body of your essay. Don’t go in with pre-conceived assumptions). 2. The body of your essay: • This is where you explore in detail how each of the bioethical principles relates to the topic of your essay. This may ultimately support your central argument, or it may be presenting alternate/opposing views (all should be included). i. Autonomy: Is the patient’s autonomy being respected or not? Can it be respected? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? ii. Beneficence: Is the intention to achieve the best possible outcome for the patient? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? iii. Non-Maleficence: Is un-necessary harm to the patient being avoided? Is it necessary to ‘harm’ the patient? Are there challenges in supporting this ethical principle? iv. Justice: Are patients receiving equitable care regarding their needs and the available resources? Are there valid reasons for treating certain patients inequitably? • In the body of the essay, you also need to include discussion of other ethical concepts such as human dignity, veracity, codes of ethics, and professional codes of conduct. Ideally, these are integrated through the discussion. • At some point you will have to justify the values judgment that you make in determining what takes ethical precedence, and why you may have to compromise on any of the four bioethical principles. This is where the other ethical theories become useful. i. Utilitarian thinking: Are you aiming for the best possible outcome for the greatest good/benefits for the greatest number? Can you demonstrate ethically that it is, indeed, a “good” outcome? ii. Deontological thinking: Is there a duty or rule that necessitates or forbids a particular type of action? Can you explain why this duty exists? iii. Virtue-Ethics thinking: Does the proposed action conform to what we might expect of the moral character virtues of health-care professionals? iv. Ethics-of-Care thinking: Is the patient being consulted with a benevolent attitude, and is there sufficient dialogue with the patient to work out what is morally best in his or her specific situation? Is there potential for conflict with any general rules of moral conduct? v. Natural Law: Are there applicable universal and objective moral norms to which each person, when acting reasonably and responsibly, should respond? 3. Your conclusion should summarise and round-off your discussion on the topic. You should: • Concisely summarise how your ideas collectively support your ethical stance • State your ethical stance. Frame this in stronger language than in the introduction - for example “…as demonstrated in the ethical arguments presented, it is/is not....”. • offer some brief concluding remarks on the topic. https://leo.acu.edu.au/mod/forum/view.php?id=4819329
Answered 1 days AfterOct 12, 2023

Answer To: We strongly advise you read the ‘Ask an Assessment Task Question’ discussion forum. If you don’t you...

Bidusha answered on Oct 13 2023
38 Votes
HLSC220: Healthcare Ethics        2
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ROBOTS SHOULD BE USED TO PROVIDE SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR RESIDENTS OF AGED-CARE FACILITIES
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Forms of Robotic Care    3
Ethics by Design    5
Ethical Use of Robotic Carers—Robot Ethics Committees    6
Informed Consent    7
Conclusion    7
References    9
Introduction
The Australian Royal Commission into Age
d treatment Quality and Safety perceived understaffing and shoddy treatment in residential aged care offices and home care administrations, and ideas were made that the Australian Government ought to support assistive technology inside the aged care industry. The elderly can get care and company from robotic care partners both at home and in nursing and helped residing offices. Concentrates on show benefits, like assisting the elderly with residing autonomously at home, help with medication, and safety checking, regardless of whether further review is required into their utilization. Be that as it may, involving robots as caregivers has natural moral hardships, like loss of protection, outlandish impediments on autonomy, absence of pride, misleading, and the exacerbation of dejection.
In any case, contemplations in regards to the justice, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence of the elderly client require that robotic care associates be created and utilized morally. To ensure that the robot's exercises are ethically OK, institutional robot morals boards and morals by configuration have been proposed as arrangements. This article looks at these thoughts and assesses their practicality. Clinical morals boards have been proposed as an answer for adapt to the moral utilization of robotic care in healthcare organizations for residents of aged care homes. Morals through plan can battle these difficulties in robotics research. In this article, I talk about the moral issues encompassing robotic care assistants and how their creation and application could relieve these issues.
Forms of Robotic Care
Robotic medical procedure is a deep rooted field, and lately, its application in different features of healthcare, including grown-up friendly care, has developed fundamentally. Robots were useful in observing for raised temperatures during the COVID-19 pandemic, cautioning the presence of the infection, and cleaning clinics and care offices without jeopardizing individuals. To assist elderly individuals with remaining at home, technology like wearable cautions, computerized pillboxes, and fall sensors as of now exists. Humanoid robots with facial elements that can impersonate human way of behaving and robots that look like creatures, for example, Paro the child seal, a buddy robotic pet that was initially made for use in Japanese care homes, are two sorts of robotic care collaborators that are being created to give friendship and help to the elderly. Care robots like Henry and Care O Bot urge elderly individuals to take their drugs and help them with home errands. Some care robots, as RIBA II, can lift and move the client.
Robots need profound commitment and human qualities, which represents a test for their powerful use in wellbeing and social care despite the fact that they are safe to the exhaustion, distractibility, crabbiness, and accessibility restrictions that human caregivers might display (Moyle 2019). How could robots be made and used in a manner that maintains moral standards and advances client government assistance? The CSIRO delivered a Conversation Paper in 2019 that analyzed how moral standards and regulation ought to be applied with regards to robotic care, which is fueled by man-made brainpower (Dawson et al. 2019). The essential rules expressed incorporate creating net benefits, safeguarding client security, and not harming or deceiving clients.
The examination...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here