Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, this assessment supports students to develop the skills of health interview and health assessment as well as beginning clinical reasoning. Students will also analyse communication in health care and reflect on their own capabilities for health communication. Assessment instructions You are preparing to care for Pauline during a community nursing visit: Review Pauline’s case below and consider the patient/person Pauline-1.PNG https://www.freep.com/story/life/advice/2016/03/08/ask-amy-lonely-middle-aged-woman-wants-friends/80961282/ Pauline is a 48 year old woman who lives alone in her 2BR government housing unit in Canberra. Pauline has a history of diabetes and anxiety, which are managed by prescribed medications, she has no surgical history. Pauline trained as a teacher’s assistant, however, has not been employed for 20 years due to her social anxiety. Pauline is currently receiving Community Nursing visits at her home twice per week for wound assessment and dressing after sustaining an injury to her right shin. The wound resulted from a deep scratch from a rosebush thorn while gardening in her small courtyard 6 weeks ago; the wound initially did not stop oozing even with a basic dressing (bandaids) applied. After her injury, Pauline waited until she could get an appointment with a bulk billing (due to financial pressures) General Practitioner close to her home, this was 3 days after the injury. Pauline has also recently suffered bereavement and has not been motivated to engage in her normal activities/hobbies and has stayed primarily indoors necessitating in home care. This week, as a student nurse, you are attending Pauline’s home with the Community Nurse. When you meet Pauline, she is sitting on her couch, she is not maintaining eye contact and is replying quietly ‘yes’ or ‘no’ responses to the Community Nurse’s questions about her wound. Pauline’s clothing is loose and appears to be stained. You observed a pile of dirty clothes on the floor in the laundry as you walked in. The nurse goes to the kitchen to prepare the equipment for the wound dressing and asks Pauline is she would like a cup of tea, Pauline replies “No, I have no appetite and no milk in the fridge”. The Community nurse invites you to have a conversation with Pauline regarding her wellbeing. 2. Research health assessment frameworks and health interviewing related to psychological, social and emotional health; prepare a set of questions for a health interview focused on psychosocial/emotional health needs. 3. Engage in a conversation (we suggest around 10mins) with AI patient Pauline using the SimConverse platform Links to an external site. (an exemplar video will be provided of this, and a practice AI patient will be available for students to interact with). Please be reassured that the content of your AI conversation is not marked, it doesn't matter if you forget to ask certain questions, or miss bits of information - it is for your formative learning, practice and reflection on health interview and communication. After your conversation with AI patient Pauline, download a copy of your conversation transcript to upload with your assessment. Here Links to an external site. is an instructional video on how to download your transcript as a PDF. The Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) is the underlying framework used for the development of this assessment. You will be marked on the following components of your assessment - please develop these in the template provided. Download template provided. From the existing case data and your AI conversation data, identify at least five (5) patient cues related to psychosocial/emotional wellbeing (ULO1) Using the health data gathered, develop three (3) actual and/or potential health issues statements providing a rationale for each statement supported by evidence (ULO2) Using relevant health/nursing literature describe two (2) evidence based therapeutic (safe and person-centred) nursing goals of care based on the actual/potential health issues identified from the assessment data analysed (ULO 2,3) After your community nursing shift, you are preparing to discuss your clinical assessment findings with a nursing supervisor. Read and consider the materials provided on Canvas related to intraprofessional communication (see Assessment 2 resources on Canvas). After reading and considering these materials address the prompts in the ‘reflection section’ of the template. Your responses (analysis) to the prompt questions need to be supported by evidence indicated by intext citations (maximum of 750 words including intext citations). These evidence informed responses will include reflective content indicating learning for nursing practice (ULO 5) Assessment formatting guidelines Word document using the template provided Download template provided Document formatting: As per template, using Calibri or Times New Roman size 12 font Referencing Style: APA 7th Edition Students' names are not to be included on any assessment tasks/submissions. Only student ID numbers should be included (as per the Assessment Policy and Assessment Procedures). Please note this assessment will be reviewed by the University’s plagiarism checking software (Ouriginal) and, with reasonable grounds, be subject to further inquiry through the Office of the Associate Dean of Education. Support resources If you are looking for more information about support and requirements for completing your assessments, review the Studying at UC: Resources for Students page as this connects you with a wider range of information and services available to you as a UC student. If you have a question about this assessment, please post it on the Assessment Q&A discussion. If you’re facing extenuating circumstances that are affecting your ability to complete an assignment on time, you can apply for an extension. Submission details Students are required to submit the following three (3) components for this assessment task: A text-based transcript of their AI patient interview (for assessor reference and text-maching via Ouriginal, not marked) Template (marked) Reference List (marked) To submit, select the 'Start Assignment' button which will then allow you to upload the files you need to submit. Below are some general FAQ guides to support you in completing this task: FAQ - What are Assignments? FAQ - How do I submit an Assignment? FAQ - Where can I get assessment help online? FAQ – How can I see my Ouriginal (formally URKUND) report before I submit the final draft of my assignment? Rubric 11858 A2 11858 A2 CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 1. Identifying Cues Using the existing case data and your AI health interview data, identify at least five (5) patient cues related to the patient's wellbeing (ie not just physiological objective data) 2.5 to >2.1 Pts Exceeds Expectations At least five (5) distinct health cues are clearly identified and are specific to the case information provided or elicited during the health interview with the patient; the cues identified demonstrate comprehensive consideration of the wellbeing of the patient 2.1 to >1.75 Pts Meets Expectations At least five (5) health cues are identified that are specific to the case information provided or elicited during the health interview with the patient; some of the cues may be somewhat repetative; the cues identified demonstrate good consideration of the wellbeing of the patient. 1.75 to >1.25 Pts Satisfactory At least five (5) health cues are identified that are somewhat relevant to the case information provided or elicited during the health interview with the patient; the cues idenitifed demonstrate satisfactory understanding of the wellbeing of the patient; there may be some repetition/lack of specificity in the cues identified 1.25 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Insufficient relevant cues identified; AND/OR cues identified are general rather than specific to the case provided and/or include significant repetition; AND/OR cues identified are not related to the wellbeing of the patient 2.5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 2. Actual and/or potential health issues Using the health data gathered, develop three (3) actual or potential psychosocial or emotional health issues statements, providing a rationale for each statement 10 to >8.0 Pts Exceeds Expectations Outstanding - superior achievement against this criterion, demonstrating accuracy and strong evidence of logical clinical reasoning at a foundational level to formulate health issues statements with valid rationales 8 to >6.5 Pts Meets Expectations Good achievement against this criterion, for the most part demonstrating accuracy and evidence of foundational clinical reasoning to formulate health issues statements with valid rationales 6.5 to >5.0 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory achievement against this criterion. The health issues described are somewhat relevant to the case and there is some evidence of foundational clinical reasoning to formulate health issues statements with valid rationales. There may be some health issues outlined that are general in description rather than specific to the case particulars. 5 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating inaccuracy AND/OR inadequacy links to the patient case AND/OR a lack of foundational clinical reasoning AND/OR inadequate understanding of psychosocial/emotional health issues. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 3a. Nursing goals of care (Goal 1) Using relevant health/nursing literature describe two (2) evidence based therapeutic (safe and person-centred) nursing goals of care based on the actual/potential health issues identified. A brief description of how this nursing goal supports the wellbeing of the person is included. 5 to >4.0 Pts Exceeds Expectations Outstanding - superior achievement against this criterion. A specific logically developed (critical thinking evident) and clearly described nursing goal statement which relates directly to the health issue/s identified. The nursing goal draws on credible evidence from health literature to validate that it is safe, therapeutic in nature and promotes wellbeing. 4 to >3.5 Pts Meets Expectations Good achievement against this criterion. A logically developed (critical thinking evident) and well described nursing goal statement which mostly relates directly to the health issue/s identified. The nursing goal draws on evidence from health literature to validate that it is safe, therapeutic in nature and promotes wellbeing. 3.5 to >2.5 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory achievement against this criterion. The nursing goal statement is included and is somewhat linked to the health issue/s identified but may lack clarity or specificity. The nursing goal draws on evidence from health literature (may be limited or variable quality) to validate that it is safe and therapeutic in nature. The discussion related to the links between the nursing goal and patient wellbeing may be limited. Further depth in consideration of the patient case or use of evidence to support discussion would strengthen to quality of this work. 2.5 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating inadequate/insufficient foundational understanding to develop an appropriate nursing goal, how it links to the health issue/s identified and/or patient wellbeing. It is not clear that evidence from literature has been used to inform discussion. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 3b. Nursing goals of care (Goal 2) Using relevant health/nursing literature describe two (2) evidence based therapeutic (safe and person-centred) nursing goals of care based on the actual/potential health issues identified. A brief description of how this nursing goal supports the wellbeing of the person is included. 5 to >4.0 Pts Exceeds Expectations Outstanding - superior achievement against this criterion. A specific logically developed (critical thinking evident) and clearly described nursing goal statement which relates directly to the health issue/s identified. The nursing goal draws on credible evidence from health literature to validate that it is safe, therapeutic in nature and promotes wellbeing. 4 to >3.5 Pts Meets Expectations Good achievement against this criterion. A logically developed (critical thinking evident) and well described nursing goal statement which mostly relates directly to the health issue/s identified. The nursing goal draws on evidence from health literature to validate that it is safe, therapeutic in nature and promotes wellbeing. 3.5 to >2.5 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory achievement against this criterion. The nursing goal statement is included and is somewhat linked to the health issue/s identified but may lack clarity or specificity. The nursing goal draws on evidence from health literature (may be limited or variable quality) to validate that it is safe and therapeutic in nature. The discussion related to the links between the nursing goal and patient wellbeing may be limited. Further depth in consideration of the patient case or use of evidence to support discussion would strengthen to quality of this work. 2.5 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating inadequate/insufficient foundational understanding to develop an appropriate nursing goal, how it links to the health issue/s identified and/or patient wellbeing. It is not clear that evidence from literature has been used to inform discussion. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 4. Reflection on professional communication Responses (analysis) to the prompt questions are informed by evidence and descriptive/reflective in nature indicating understanding of communication theory and strategies to develop intraprofessional communication. 10 to >8.0 Pts Exceeds Expectations Outstanding achievement against this criterion, demonstrating sophisticated and reflective examination of intraprofessional communication as it applies to the profession, patient safety and self development. Quality literature is integrated into the discussion. 8 to >6.5 Pts Meets Expectations Good achievement against this criterion, demonstrating developing reflective thinking about intraprofessional communication as it applies to the profession, patient safety and self development. Literature is used to support the discussion. 6.5 to >5.0 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating evidence of foundational reflective thinking, however, lacking in depth related to considerations of intraprofessional communication and/or the professional and/or patient safety and/or self development. Reading more widely, and further practice at reflective thinking and writing will strengthen your work. 5 to >0 Pts Below Expectations "Unsatisfactory achievement against this criterion, demonstrating no or very limited evidence of reflective thinking AND/OR unsatisfactory discussion relating communication theory to the profession, patient safety or self development. Thorough editing and revision is required to achieve satisfactorily in this criteria. Clarifying assessment expectations, reading more widely, and further practice at reflective thinking and writing will strengthen your work. " 10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 5. Scholarly approach - acknowledgement of sources Intext referencing and reference list formatting in APA 7th edition style 2.5 to >2.1 Pts Exceeds Expectations APA 7th referencing style is applied, no referencing errors in text or reference list. 2.1 to >1.75 Pts Meets Expectations APA 7th edition referencing style is applied, some errors in intext citations and/or reference list. 1.75 to >1.25 Pts Satisfactory APA 7th referencing style is used inconsistently, with errors, however an attempt is made to correctly acknowledge sources. 1.25 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Incorrect application of APA 7th edition referencing style resulting in inadequate acknowledgement of sources and risk of breaching academic integrity/plagiarism. 2.5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome 6. Scholarly approach - academic quality of template, spelling and grammar Template is correctly utilised, word counts within template are adhered to. Formatting is professional with double spacing between text, and uses Times New Roman or Calibri size 12 font. 5 to >4.0 Pts Exceeds Expectations Outstanding - superior achievement against this criteria. Template is logical and clearly presented. Professional terminology is used throughout. No errors with grammar, punctuation or spelling. Adheres to the word limits and submission formatting. 4 to >3.5 Pts Meets Expectations Good, clear template presentation. Some errors with grammar, punctuation, and spelling which would benefit from some further editing and revision to improve academic quality. Adheres to the word limits, and submission formatting is mostly correct. 3.5 to >2.5 Pts Satisfactory Satisfactory template presentation. Consistent errors with grammar, punctuation and/or spelling which detract from the clarity of the work, however key points are still adequately communicated to the reader. Significant editing and revision required to improve the academic quality of the work. Adheres to the word limits and submission formatting is mostly correct. 2.5 to >0 Pts Below Expectations Template is unclearly presented or difficult to follow for the reader. AND/OR Errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling detract significantly from the clarity of the writing so that ideas and understanding of concepts cannot be communicated clearly to the reader. Thorough editing and revision is required to achieve satisfactorily in this criteria. AND/OR Word counts not adhered to, formatting of work impedes clarity of message and demonstrates a lack of attention to detail. 5 pts Total points: 40