Unit Outline FACULTY OF Education and Arts School of Education National Online-Master of Teaching/Teach for Australia SEMESTER 2, 2019 EDLA 612: ASSESSMENT AND CURRICULUM DESIGN IN TESOL UNIT OUTLINE...

1 answer below »
The assessment task 3


Unit Outline FACULTY OF Education and Arts School of Education National Online-Master of Teaching/Teach for Australia SEMESTER 2, 2019 EDLA 612: ASSESSMENT AND CURRICULUM DESIGN IN TESOL UNIT OUTLINE Credit points: 10 Prerequisites/incompatibles: NIL Lecturers in Charge: Dr Sally Humphrey Email: [email protected] Telephone: (02) 94659086 Dr Thu Ngo Email: [email protected] Telephone: (02) 97014461 Unit rationale, description and aim: This is the second unit in a Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) curriculum sequence. In this unit students explore the links between the development of the English language proficiency of English as an Additional Language (EAL/D) learners, appropriate models of assessment and curriculum design in TESOL and broader curricular access. In this light, it examines concepts such as assessment for learning and assessment of learning in relation to language, and their implications for the design of curriculum to maximise student language learning outcomes. It considers how the achievement of language learning outcomes facilitates full curricular access for EAL/D students in mainstream educational settings. In this way the programming, assessment and evaluation cycle for language learning in the context of relevant syllabus documents and in a variety of settings such as high school and mainstream primary school classrooms are addressed. Mode: Fully Online Attendance pattern: Between July and December 2019. Duration: You should anticipate undertaking 150 of study for this unit, including viewing lectures, readings and assignment preparation. In order to achieve the learning outcomes and pass this unit, you are expected to fully engage in the learning activities prescribed, including any hurdle requirements. Note that the online learning environment can regulate your progression through the learning activities, and it will be necessary for you to complete certain activities before progressing to others or being automatically able to make submissions for assessments. (Note that there may be difference from one learning area to another as to what learning activities are presented or required as hurdle tasks, or the use of course progression regulation, but the quantum of study will be the same for all.) In order to satisfactorily complete the unit you must demonstrate that you have met the learning outcomes of the unit, complete the prescribed hurdle tasks, and obtain a combined score for the assessment tasks of at least 50%. LEARNING OUTCOMES On successful completion of this unit, pre-service teachers should be able to: 1.identify the relationship between the development of the English language proficiency of EAL/D learners and curriculum development and assessment for teaching EAL/D students (GA4, GA5); AQF 9Kn 1, Sk 1, Sk 4, Ap 1, APST 1.1, 1.3 2.identify and apply key theories related to assessment and curriculum design in TESOL in a variety of learning contexts (GA8): AQF 9 Kn 1 Sk 4 Ap 1; APST 2.3 3.design appropriate English curricula for particular EAL/D learner/s in a variety of learning contexts (GA9): AQF 9 Kn 1, Sk 2, Ap 1; APST 2.2, 3.1 4.design appropriate assessment tasks for EAL/D learners in a variety of learning contexts (GA9): AQF 9 Kn 1, Sk 2 Ap 1; APST 3.2, 5.4. AQF LEVEL 9 CRITERIA Graduates at this level will have specialised knowledge and skills for research, and/or professional practice and/or further learning. Knowledge: Graduates at this level will have advanced and integrated understanding of a complex body of knowledge in one or more disciplines or areas of practice. Skills: Graduates at this level will have expert, specialised cognitive and technical skills in a body of knowledge or practice to independently: · analyse critically, reflect on and synthesise complex information, problems, concepts and theories · research and apply established theories to a body of knowledge or practice · interpret and transmit knowledge, skills and ideas to specialist and non-specialist audiences Application of knowledge and skills Graduates at this level will apply knowledge and skills to demonstrate autonomy, expert judgement, adaptability and responsibility as a practitioner or learner. ACU Graduate Attributes On successful completion of this unit, students should have developed their ability to: GA4think critically and reflectively GA5demonstrate values, knowledge, skills and attitudes appropriate to the discipline and/or profession GA8locate, organise, analyse, synthesise and evaluate information GA9demonstrate effective communication in oral and written English language and visual media CONTENT Topics include: Module 1: Contextual understanding of EAL/D learners and their learning contexts Module 2: Developing a toolkit for assessing writing development Module 3: Programming and Assessment Module 4: Evaluation of programmes and teaching QUALITY ASSURANCE AND STUDENT FEEDBACK This unit has been evaluated through the ‘Student Evaluation of Learning and Teaching’ (SELT) online surveys. This unit has been modified following student evaluations in 2010 and 2011. Some content has been modified, the sequence of presentation and placement of assessment has been changed and in particular LEO web pages have been redesigned SELT surveys are usually conducted at the end of the teaching period. Your practical and constructive feedback is valuable to improve the quality of the unit. Please ensure you complete the SELT survey for the unit. You can also provide feedback at other times to the unit lecturers, course coordinators and/or through student representatives. LEARNING AND TEACHING STRATEGY AND RATIONALE Online Lectures Readings and web-based interactive tasks including student-led discussion. LECTURE CAPTURE All modules on LEO will include links to online lectures or videos; guided readings, quizzes, worksheets; discussion boards Links to recorded lectures will be provided on LEO ASSESSMENT STRATEGY AND RATIONALE The assessment tasks for this unit are designed for you to demonstrate your achievement of each learning outcome. In order to pass this unit, you are required to complete all assessment tasks. The total of assessment tasks will amount to the equivalent of 5,500 words. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION, MARKING AND RETURN Written work should be word processed at 10 - 12 point (Times, Arial or equivalent); margins 2 cm on left; spacing 1.5 preferred. referencing should use APA style (Handwritten work will not be penalised.). Submit work through Turnitin on LEO The EDLA612 cover sheet (found on LEO) must be attached on top of the ACU Assignment cover sheet and signed to your assignments. Assignments will be returned electronically within 3 weeks. SCHEDULE For the most up-to-date information, please check your LEO unit and also note advice from your lecturing and tutoring staff for changes to this schedule. Week Teaching & Learning Content Topics Readings Hurdle Task activities MODULE 1: Contextual understanding of EAL/D learners and their learning contexts 1 29th July Understanding EAL/D Learners · Who are our EAL/D students and what cultural and linguistic factors may affect their learning? · Understanding EAL/D students’ learning contexts. What knowledge of assessment literacies do we already have? diagnostic assessment PETAA paper 183 de Courcy et al ACARA · EAL/D Overview and Advice · EAL/D progressions Humphrey (2016) Chap 1 Davison, C. & Leung, C. (2009) Assessment Task 1 Hurdle 1 - diagnostic MODULE 2: Developing a toolkit for assessing writing development 2 5th August What do we need to know about language to assess student writing? (Genre and register continuum: a view of language ‘from the top’) Genre: Derewianka & Jones, 2016, Ch1. Register continuum & language: · Humphrey (2016) Chap 2 · Lecture: Creating effective persuasive texts: National Literacy and Numeracy week NSW · · · www.nlnw.nsw.edu.au/videos.htm Assessment Task 1: Due 7th August by 5 p.m 3 13th August What is the teacher’s toolkit for persuasive writing? (Field & Mode) Humphrey 2016 Chap 2 (cont) Lecture: Expressing and developing ideas in everyday and academic writing Hurdle 2. Practice analysis: field and mode in analytical persuasive writing 4 20th August Tenor Lecture: Interacting with audiences in everyday and academic writing Hurdle 3 Practice analysis: tenor in analytical persuasive writing Assessment Task 2 Due 26 August by 5 p.m Students on Placement: 26 August -21 September MODULE 3: Assessment & Programming W5 23rd September ASSESSMENT: Designing principled rubrics for assessment and reporting · Critical analysis of assessment tools for EAL/D learners Flint et al.2017, Ch9 Assessing EAL/D students’ literacies · Creagh, S. (2016). · NAPLAN Marking Criteria · ACARA: EAL/D Learning Progression · National Literacy Learning Progression · Fang & Wang 2011 AJLL Hurdle task See LEO W5 forum 30 Sep University Vacation Week and Labour Day 30 Sep-7 Oct (7 October Labour Day) W6 8th Oct ASSESSMENT: Practice · Creating a rubric with the SFL tool · Writing feedback to students · NAPLAN Persuasive Marking Guide · Fang & Wang 2011 AJLL See LEO W6 forum W7 14 Oct · Programming & Assessment using The Teaching & Learning Cycle · Programming: The programming cycle Flint et al 2017, Ch5 Derewianka & Jones 2016, Ch3 PETAA paper 215 See LEO W7 forum W8 21 Oct · Macro programming Back-mapping to design a sequence of Reading/Viewing lessons · Monitoring & Formative assessment in the Reading/Viewing activity sequence. Flint et al 2017, Ch5 Rose, D. 2016. PETAA paper 202 See LEO W8 forum W9 28 Oct · Macro programming: Back-mapping to design a Writing unit · Monitoring & Formative assessment in the Writing activity sequence. Consolidation: Sequencing units Flint et al 2017, Ch5 Derewianka & Jones 2016, Ch3 See LEO W9 forum Assessment Task 3 Due 4th November 2019 by 5 p.m ASSESSMENT In order to pass this unit, you are required to meet attendance requirements and pass each assignment. The three assessment tasks are designed for you to demonstrate your achievement of each learning outcome. OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT Brief Description of Assessment Tasks Weighting Learning Outcome/s Assessed Graduate Attributes Assessment Task 1: (due date: 7th August by 5 p.m) Developing understandings of the EAL/D learner and their learning context. Design 8-10 slides for a short (15-20) minute oral presentation which can be used to inform colleagues about EAL/D learners in your context of teaching and learning. This information should be a synthesis of key ideas in set readings. 10% 1, 2 4,5,8 Assessment Task 2: (due date 26th August by 5 p.m) Diagnostic assessment to inform curriculum design. Draw on your developing knowledge of language and context (genre and register) to conduct diagnostic assessment of two EAL/D learners’ texts for ‘high stakes’ assessment of writing. 40% 1, 2,4 9 Assessment Task 3: (due date 4th November by 5 p.m) Assessment and Programming: Using your assessment and evaluation of students’ writing samples in Assessment Task 2, design a rubric and program to support students with NAPLAN writing. 50% 3 & 4 9 ASSESSMENT TASK 1: DEVELOPING UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE EAL/D LEARNER AND THEIR LEARNING CONTEXT. Due date: August 7 2019 by 5 p.m Weighting:10% Length and/or format:500 words (equivalent) Purpose: To deepen teachers’ knowledge and understanding of the experiences and challenges faced by EAL/D students in both the school setting and in wider society. Learning outcomes assessed: Outcomes two and three How to submit:Assignments will be presented as slides uploaded to turnitin Return of assignment:Students will have their assignments returned via turnitin. Assessment criteria:See rubric
Answered Same DayNov 05, 2021

Answer To: Unit Outline FACULTY OF Education and Arts School of Education National Online-Master of...

Sunabh answered on Nov 10 2021
151 Votes
Running Head ASSESSMENT TASK 3                            1
ASSESSMENT TASK 3        2
ASSESSMENT TASK 3: DEVELOPING KNOWLEDGE OF PROGRAMMING, ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION
Table of Contents
1.    PART 1: ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK    3
Rubrics    3
Feedback for students    4
2.    PART 2: PROGRAMMING    6
Step 1 : Identifying students’ learning needs    6
STEP 2: Designing a rubric for a specific assessment question    6
STEP 3: Backward mapping from assessment task to develop learning sequences    9
1.    Part 1: Program summary    9
2.    Part 2: Teaching content Scope and Sequence summary    12
3.    Part 3: Sequence of units    12
References
    18
Appendix    19
1. PART 1: ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK
Rubrics
    Dimensions
    Towards expected levels
    At expected levels
    Above expected levels
    1. Follows the required lexical density and grammatical intricacy, which may be able to relate to field or mode.
    
    
    
    2. Complexity level maintained by evidence of paragraphs and linguistic features at sentence levels
    
    
    
    3. Able to convey attitudes in terms of judgement, appreciation and affect
    
    
    
    4. Level of vocabulary used
    
    
    
Feedback for students
Providing feedbacks to the students will be an essential aspect as well as necessity for the educators in order to make the students aware of their mistakes. English, as an Additional Language (EAL/D), learners may not be the speakers of English language. However, they are required to understand and speak language and therefore, meta-language can be a major tool for them. Since, meta-language is the language used to describe another language therefore, it is not necessary that the expressions used in meta-language would be similar to that of original language.
After the evaluation, educators are required to provide a constructive feedback to the students so that they may be able to identify their mistakes as well as would work upon their skills. Feedback provided would be in educative nature and therefore meta-language used must be able to convey the expressions and should not be devoid of any of the important reflections. Further, the feedback to be provided must be according to the personal needs of every children because students may be more interpretive then others therefore, use of harsh words must be avoided. Another major strategy that can be used to provide effective feedback to the students would be to mark the rubrics. In other words, descriptive rubrics will allow educator to mark the things that student may be lacking within their work and therefore, it will present a more acceptable as well as reflective feedback.
Providing a model for example to the students would allow having a comparative feedback. For example providing a C+ student with the model of how A+ paper look like will allow them to have a self-interpretation of missing things. In other words, this strategy will help students to identify their weakness on their own and therefore, they may imply efforts in order to improve themselves.
Likewise, leaners are always curious in order to identify where they stand and therefore, providing answers to specific questions can allow them to understand their position with respect to the expectations of educators. Questions such as, what can be done by student? What cannot be done by the student? How does the work of a specific student distinct from others? Moreover, how can they do better? Educators can provide answers to these questions and it may help to provide a quality feedback.
Further, a specific feedback that clearly defines the kind of improvement required such as ‘improved grammar’ would be more beneficial for student. Correcting the wrongs and then highlighting those using coloured fonts would be a suggestive model for the students in order to answer what the student could have done. Along with this, reasonable feedback depending upon the needs or abilities of children can also be considered as an effective feedback strategy.
2. PART 2: PROGRAMMING
Step 1: Identifying students’ learning needs
Based upon the analysis of texts from task 2 it can be analysed that there were two types of word level used that are academic as well as every day or informal. It would be essential to consider that academic style of writing is considered to possess much higher level and have more acceptance as well a formal structure. Therefore, in the current Year 9 National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), major focus would be required towards academic writing style because it is the identified learning need of the EAL/D students.
STEP 2: Designing a rubric for a specific assessment question
Chosen prompt for this Year 9 NAPLAN plan would be ‘Wastage of water would lead to global water crises. Discuss’.
This prompt will have to base upon persuasive writing and curriculum learning where students would be required to construct argumentative essay and therefore, they will be encouraged in order to move away from specified frameworks or structures. Rather students will use different writing styles, text types and different persuasive skills. Further, they would also be required to draw on personal knowledge when responding to the prompt and they are not expected to have detailed knowledge regarding the topic rather, students must frame the arguments based upon their current knowledge.
Specified curriculum for this assessment is ‘Diagnostic Assessment to Inform Curriculum Design’. In order to assess or analyse the assessment, rubric will be required, which is as follows—
    Dimensions
    Below expectations
    Needs improvement
    Meets expectations
    Exceeds expectations
    1. Clearly conveys the idea as well as engage and persuade the reader.
    
    
    
    
    2. Provides an appropriate as well as effective text structure with components of persuasive texts
    
    
    
    
    3. Relevance, selection and elaboration of ideas
    
    
    
    
    4. Use of grammatical elements and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here