This assignment tests the student’s ability to articulate and evaluate arguments for and against the existence of God.
AS Instructions:
Write a 1000-word, double-spaced paper (approximately 3-4pages) explaining the major arguments for the existence of God. Explain which argument you find the most convincing and why. Then explain the problem of evil proposed by J.L. Mackie. Do you find the problem convincing? Explain in detail your answer.
Upload as a word document. You may use any style that you prefer, i.e., APA, MLA, Chicago.
Consider the following scenario:
Farmer Joe is concerned about his cow, Daisy. In fact, he is so concerned that when his wife tells him that Daisy is happily grazing on the field, Farmer Joe wants to see for himself. He doesn't want merely to have a 99 percent probability that Daisy is safe, he wants to be able to say that he
knows
that Daisy is safe. Farmer Joe then goes out to the field and, standing by the gate, sees in the distance, behind some trees, a white and black shape that he recognizes as his Daisy. He goes back home and tells his wife that he knows that Daisy is safe on the field. Yet, at this point, does Farmer Joe really know it?
Discuss why or why not you think that Farmer Joe has knowledge or his cow’s whereabouts.
What do you think is required of Joe to be able to say that he knows that Daisy is on the field?
By now you have realized that abortion is not a simple black-or-white issue. However, those in favor of abortion ("pro-choice")argue that the question of the morality of abortion rests on the question of whether a fetus is a person.
On the other hand,"pro-life" argue that abortion destroy a human life, and thus it is an immoral act.
First, explain the difference between a person and a human being. Why is this difference relevant in the discussion of abortion? Do you regard the human/person distinction relevant in the discussion or do you think there are more important factors to consider. Which ones?
In the previous unit (Unit 7) we have discussed the morality of abortion. Two of the main moral considerations were the status of the fetus and the right of the pregnant woman to make decisions that affect her own body. Regarding the status of the fetus, the question is whether a fetus is a person. For many this is an important question because if the fetus is a person, then it is immoral to kill it; if it isn’t, then abortion is morally permissible. Regarding the rights of the pregnant woman, it is argued that the morality of abortion stems from whether a woman can make any decision she wishes about her own body, including whether or not to terminate a pregnancy.
Having considered these points, what are the similarities and differences between the questions of abortion and animal ethics? What is the connection between personhood and rights? Do you think some animals are moral persons? If not, do you agree that some animals have at least the right to life. On what principle can that right be based?