Two studies (Hughes, Cutting, & Dunn, 2001; Hughes et al., 2002) have demonstrated a new observational technique for assessing disruptive behavior in young children. The technique involves observing...

Two studies (Hughes, Cutting, & Dunn, 2001; Hughes et al., 2002) have demonstrated a new observational technique for assessing disruptive behavior in young children. The technique involves observing disruptive behaviors that are triggered while the children play a competitive card game (Snap) that is rigged to ensure that they experience a losing streak. The situation is contrived to produce frustration (the kids cannot win), which often leads to a disruptive outburst.

Briefly explain the difference between naturalistic observation and contrived observation. Is the Snap technique an example of naturalistic or contrived observation? What is the major advantage of contrived observation?