Turkle refers to what she calls our "Im man complicity in a digital fantasy." In what sense does our involvement with simubtions qualify as "funt:isy''? Doesn't eve1yone-even chjld1·e11-undcrstand...

Turkle refers to what she calls our "Im man complicity in a digital fantasy." In what sense does our involvement with simubtions qualify as "funt:isy''? Doesn't eve1yone-even chjld1·e11-undcrstand that Furbies are pretend creatures, not real living beings? If everyone understands. can we still be deceived in some way? What does Turkle have in mind when she distinguishes between a "psychology of projection" and a "psychology of engagement"' Projcc1io11 refers to qualities we impose on things. Docs c11gagcmc11t'mean that our creations are in some way changing us in tun1?