try to make good assignment because last time I got zero marks because of plagiarism I got 43% plagiarism just because of TFTH so please make sure about my problem and I want to get at least 22 out off 30 so be aware about my requirement other wise I will fail that subject ( I made last assignment from your help searvies which is TFTH )
42908 A2 Assessment guide(2).docx 42908 Engineering Project Preparation Assignment 2 – Assessment guideline Addressing the task Indicative of a passing grade: Indicative of a Distinction grade: Abstract Needs to be clear and concise with an overview of the literature review topic, main findings and conclusions presented. In addition, is completely consistent with the remaining document. Introduction Section needs to have relevant details of specific investigation described using appropriate language with brief introduction of general research area and outline of what will follow. In addition, it needs to clearly articulate the need to undertake the research and present the critical details of research area with a concise outline of what will follow. Literature Review The Literature Review section summarises and demonstrates understanding of relevant and important research in the chosen field (15 high quality references). In addition, all the reference material is consistent with the research gaps identified; the articles analysis is strategically ordered. Evaluation The section organises and evaluates the research with a flow between articles (article organisation grouped in a systematic manner) The section should explain how each item of literature links to your own project, how your project uses and adds to the literature. The section critically reviews existing work, identifies relevant research areas and any opposing views. Links to the research gaps are identified Links to the gap the project will fill, all the reference material is consistent with the research gap addressed. Conclusions A discussion that leads to specific conclusions supported by review/analysis section evaluation is present. The discussion highlights research gap the project intends to fill. In addition, is completely consistent with the remaining of the document Presentation; how it reads Organisation The submission draws the reader in, easy to follow from start to end and remains focussed on addressing the assessment task. The submission presents to the reader pertinent and relevant points without leaving gaps or being too repetitive. It is succinct and to the point. As for passing, plus: It has carefully considered content; thorough; very well- articulated; broad and rich in depth; equal and consistent for each (addressing the task) component. Spelling and grammar Just a few errors, not distracting to the reader No grammatical errors, the use of language in describing matter should be carefully considered & very well- articulated; broad and rich in description. Referencing No referencing errors (Harvard UTS Reference Style) List of references is broad: covers topic well, contains a mix of articles with current state of the art 42908 A2 CHECKLIST.docx CHECKLIST Assignment 2 42908 Engineering Project Preparation: Literature Review 1. My literature review has a research topic that is sufficiently narrow to form the basis of a research project to be completed in the next semester. Yes 2. My assignment is properly referenced throughout, using both in-text referencing and final reference list. Yes 3. I have used a minimum of 15 research articles which I have summarised and commented on as part of my literature review Yes 4. My assignment has an introduction, a literature review, an analysis and discussions and conclusions 5. The total word count of my assignment is between 2000-2500 words, NOT counting the final reference list Yes 42908 A2 Literature Review Marking Criteria.doc 42908 Assessment Task 2 Literature Review: Marking Criteria Marking Criteria WEIGHTING Unsatisfactory (0) Substandard (30) Pass (60) Credit (70) Distinction (80) High Distinction (90) Outstanding (100) Abstract Brief overview of topic and research area, main aim of project, main findings and conclusions 5% Introduction Presents general research area, specific topic, main aim of project and a brief outline of what will follow 10% Literature Review Summarises and demonstrates understanding of relevant and important research in the chosen field (15 high quality references) 20% Evaluation Organises and critically evaluates the research , links to own project, describes how own project uses/adds to the literature reviewed 25% Conclusions Brief discussion leads to specific conclusions supported by Review section evaluation. Highlights research gap for project to fill. 10% Referencing Citations and References list correctly follow Harvard UTS referencing style, with consistent use between text and list 10% Organisation Logical organisation and flowing paragraphs. Appropriate use of academic language. 10% Grammar Grammar and spelling mostly used well, not distracting the reader 10% 42908_A2_Word_Review_Template.doc STUDENT NAME - 42908 - Assignment 2 Literature Review Template By ‘Author Name’ Affiliation (MSc Profile or Track) & Study no Abstract Say very briefly 1) what the review is about, 2) what the main content is, 3) what the main aim or objectives are, and 4) what the main findings are. End with a strong sentence that highlights the significance of the work presented in the review and any envisioned long-standing contribution to the body of knowledge. 1. Introduction Introduce the general topic or field of the review setting out any advancements and challenges of interest. Then introduce more fully the specific topic addressed in the review and state any main aim or objectives to be met. Say very briefly what is to come in the layout of the review. Note: the Introduction should include general references to back up the points made. 2. Literature Review This section is a review of a particular area(s) and/or methods that you will require to address your research question. For example, this could be particular theories, (mathematical) tools or solutions from other related areas that could be used to solve the problem. This section summarises and demonstrates understanding of relevant and important research in the chosen field (15 high quality references). Briefly discuss and clarify your research topic, what research has been undertaken (draw parallels with research articles in this field). Discuss the different solutions/methods from the articles: are there disadvantages to using them? Why are they appropriate? What other areas can be used to augment the solutions in order to make them more suitable. As the outcome of the entire literature review is identification of research gap(s) all the reference material should be consistent with the research gap(s) and leading towards it. This section should be structured in a consistent manner, in presenting the various works of interest and showing understanding of how it all links together. Ensure you cluster the literature appropriately and that papers are consistently related to each other, avoiding stand alone papers. 3. Evaluation This section consists of two major parts: analysis (an in-depth analysis based on the previous literature review section) and evaluation (the link between the previous literature review section and your future work – the research gap that you will address through a project proposal). The section organises and evaluates the research with a flow between articles (article organisation grouped in a systematic manner); it critically reviews existing work, identifies relevant research areas and any opposing views. Links to the research gaps are identified. The evaluation is a consolidated theoretical position that uses the main points of the review section so that the link to the work is made more explicit. In other words justify how your work uses and adds to the literature reviewed in the previous section. You also discuss (an aspect of) what you are going to use in order to fill the gap in the knowledge. What areas are to be combined in order to cover the gap in the knowledge? 4. Conclusions The conclusions should be written in a precise, unique, clear and accurate manner. Always check that they are well supported by the work you presented in the review/justification section. Check them against the main literature so that you can make a statement about the longer-term impact of your work on the body of knowledge. Lift the most important conclusions into the Abstract and check that both (Conclusions and Abstract section) are consistent, also check this with the Introduction. This is done because the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion form the key points of entry and exit into the work and make a big impact on accessibility and getting across the relevance! 5. References List all references consistently, using the Harvard UTS referencing system. A useful link on how to quote and reference properly can be found in the Guide to Harvard UTS referencing from the University of Technology Sydney http://www.lib.uts.edu.au/help/referencing/harvard-uts-referencing-guide . Most importantly, the author being referred to is given credit through their earlier work, that this is dated to show the chronological order of developments, and that the reader has enough information to find that specific reference. Relative to the latter point: Include the city and country in which the conference was held, and the edition/volume/page numbers of a journal article.. The strongest references are ones that have been reviewed prior to publication (journals for example) and the weakest are web sites and popular publications. Only reputable websites (from a society or major industry player) should be included and the date of access should be noted. Preferably stay away from web references as they are uncontrolled sources of information. Note: web references, technical reports, standard textbooks, patents etc. do not count towards the number of quality references used. The number of quality references should always greatly outnumber the number of general references. It looks unprofessional to refer to the textbooks and templates of this course. 07 September 2016 3 Reference Assignment format.docx STUDENT NAME - 42908 - Assignment 2 Challenges of visible light communications in indoor environments By Mark Smith MEM Telecommunications major - 0000000 Abstract Visible light communications (VLC) is an emerging technology in today’s world which has achieved significant popularity as an alternative to radio frequency (RF) technology. VLS has several advantages over traditional systems, such as providing sufficient security and remarkably consistent transmission rate. Using Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in VLC adds to these advantages, in particular for indoor environment or short range communications. However, there are also many challenges involved in fully implementing VLC in indoor environments. The main aim of this body of work is to review further some of these challenges such as: limited modulation bandwidth of LEDs, Inter symbol interference (ISI) with reference to precision of indoor positioning systems. Reviewing the current solutions, with emphasis placed on the recent research in this domain, has led to the identification of research gaps and revealed opportunities for future work in the successful implementation of VLC in indoor environments. In particular this body of work highlights that research in SNR(Signal-to-noise ratio) level handling and modulation techniques on SDVLC systems with respect to throughput as those needing attention and yielding the most interim value to the existing body of knowledge. Introduction Visible light communications VLC is an evolving technology that uses the visible range (370-780nm) for both lighting and transmitting data. It is becoming a popular technology for its several advantages, the VLC spectrum is unlicensed and therefore it can be used as a substitute of radio frequency (RF) spectrum and thereby reduce the clogging