Topic is :The Costs of Processing Death Cases

Juvenile Justice Reform: Court Rulings and Empirical Evidence
Juvenile justice reform has been a consistent issue in the United States for decades. It includes goal for reducing recidivism and promoting rehabilitation. The juvenile justice system can differ from adult system. The essay describes about the Costs of Processing Death Cases along with findings and societal shifts that have shaped juvenile justice. It includes analysis of rulings of court and outcomes align with principles of rehabilitation and justice.
Historical Context of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile justice in U.S. was designed for focusing on rehabilitation rather than providing punishment. The first juvenile court in Illinois in 1899 was rooted in belief that young offenders were capable of making change than adults. The early system was focused on welfare of the child. It is believed that individualized treatment can help in preventing future criminal behaviour. By 1980s and 1990s, the punitive approach is considered as violent crime among juveniles surged. Policies like zero tolerance and practice of trying juveniles as adults gained traction has led to harsher sentences and long-term consequences for young offenders (Cauffman et al. 2018). After 21st century, U.S. starts to shift back towards reformative model that was influenced by court rulings.
Key Court Rulings: Shaping Juvenile Justice Reform
The famous cases in juvenile justice reform were Roper v. Simmons (2005), in which U.S. Supreme Court has executed individuals that includes committed crimes as minors. It was unconstitutional under Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. The decision was recognized as the developmental differences between adolescents and adults. This was regarding the impulse control, susceptibility...