PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9 Page 1 of 6 Assessment Task In this assessment, you will select an Australian strategic level federal or state health policy to critically...

1 answer below »
Topic for assignment is National women’s health strategy 2020 - 2030


PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9 Page 1 of 6 Assessment Task In this assessment, you will select an Australian strategic level federal or state health policy to critically review. You will write a 2,000-word (+/–10%) report that identifies the main concepts within the policy and relate these concepts back to Kingdon’s (2011) multiple streams theory. Based on the latest evidence you will then make recommendations for future policy development. Please refer to the Task Instructions (below) for details on how to complete this task. Context As a future public health professional. you will be expected to keep up to date with policy developments in your area of interest (e.g., child health). It is important that you understand what a policy is, the main concepts that comprise a strategic level health policy and how policy theory interacts with the formulation of these important documents. ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6001 Health Policy and Advocacy Assessment Report: Australian Health Policy Review Individual/Group Individual Length 2,000 words (+/–10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by the successful completion of the task below include: a) Critically analyse different theories and approaches to policy agenda setting to understand health policy formulation and advocacy for a specific population health issue; b) Critically analyse issues in contemporary Australian health care policy, including the evaluation of global influences on Australian health policy; c) Critically analyse and reflect on political and ethical issues in the formulation of evidence-based policy and its translation into real-world policy application; d) Evaluate the role of government and other stakeholders in the processes for ensuring the accountability for health policy and advocating for change. Submission Due by 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT on the Sunday at the end of Module 9 Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9 Page 2 of 6 In this assessment, you will learn how to effectively search for a contemporary state or federal health policy relating to a specific issue or population group. You will learn how to review policies from the perspective of the theories and concepts that should inform their formulation. You will also learn how to formulate evidence-based policy recommendations to improve health policy outcomes. Instructions To complete this task, you must select a public health topic or population group of interest and conduct a search of Australia federal and/or state websites to find a relevant policy to review. Your policy selection needs to be approved by your learning facilitator. Once your policy is approved, you will perform a policy review that includes the following components: • An introduction. • A definition of policy as per the core course readings. • Details of the search strategy and criteria used to select your area of interest and chosen health policy to review, including any challenges. • A description of each of the key policy elements (see list below) and an application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory (including the problem, policy and political streams; policy stakeholders and/or policy entrepreneurs and if applicable, the window of opportunity): o Ministerial forward; o Vision statement; o Goals; o Objectives; o Strategies; and o Other concepts of interest. Note: You must provide examples using relevant quotations from the policy. • Evidence-based recommendations that highlight further areas of consideration or improvement for future policy development. For example, consider: o What are the policy silences? o What is missing? o Is the ministerial forward and/or vision statement consistent with the strategies outlined in the policy? • Conclusions. This Australian Health Policy Review is to be presented in a report style, you need to reference both your chosen policy and any additional primary or secondary research used. For more information on report writing, visit: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills_ap/reports PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9 Page 3 of 6 Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage. Submission Instructions Submit this task via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Academic Integrity All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts. https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool /webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498847_1&mode=reset http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 4 of 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Knowledge and understanding of health policy. Defines policy as per the core course readings. Selects an appropriate strategic level of Australian health policy. Lists, expands and comments on essential elements of the selected health policy. Percentage for this criterion = 35% Inappropriate choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy. Understanding of the definition and function of health policy not demonstrated. The review of the chosen health policy is not provided and/or not supported by evidence. A strategic level of an Australian health policy has been chosen; however, more relevant options could have been considered. Limited understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated. The review of the chosen health policy is inadequate and/or only supported by limited evidence. Appropriate choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy. Understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated. A review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by evidence. Relevant choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy. Impressive understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated. A comprehensive review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by quality evidence. Highly relevant choice of a strategic level of an Australian health policy. Sophisticated understanding of the definition and function of health policy demonstrated. An exceptional review of the chosen health policy that is well supported by high-quality evidence. Critically analyses the selected health policy in relation to Kingdon’s multiple stream theory including problems, Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is very limited and demonstrates a lack of understanding of Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is very limited and demonstrates an inadequate understanding of Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is good, but more detail is required. The analysis demonstrates Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is effective and demonstrates an impressive Application of Kingdon’s multiple streams theory in the policy review is highly effective and demonstrates a sophisticated SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 5 of 6 policy and politics streams. Discussion based on Kingdon’s multiples streams theory. Percentage for this criterion = 30% the theory and its application in real-world settings. the theory and its application in real-world settings. an understanding of the theory and its application in real-world settings. understanding of the theory and its application in real- world settings. understanding of the theory and its application in real-world settings. Recommendations for future policy improvement/develop ment. Percentage for this criterion = 20% Presents less than two recommendations for the development of future policy/and or improvement. Recommendations are not supported by evidence and demonstrate a very limited understanding of the function and application of health policy. Presents less than three recommendations for the development of future policy/ and or improvement. Recommendations are supported by limited evidence and demonstrate a limited understanding of the function and application of health policy. Presents three evidence- based recommendations for the development of future policy/ and or improvement. Recommendations are supported by evidence and demonstrate an understanding of the function and application of health policy. Presents four appropriate evidence-based recommendations for the development of future policy/ and or improvement. Recommendations are supported by evidence and demonstrate a good understanding of the function and application of health policy. Presents four insightful and evidence-based recommendations for the development of future policy/ and or improvement (with examples). Recommendations are supported by quality evidence and demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the function and application of health policy. SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 6 of 6 Adheres to academic writing standards, including correct grammar, clarity and comprehension. Adheres to academic integrity standards as per the TUA policy— APA style. Percentage for this criterion = 15% A poor academic writing style. There are consistent mistakes in the application of the APA style. There may be questions about
Answered Same DayNov 11, 2022

Answer To: PUBH6001_Assessment_2_Brief_PolicyReview_Module Due 9 Page 1 of 6 Assessment Task In this...

Dr Insiyah R. answered on Nov 12 2022
63 Votes
Introduction    2
Critical Discussion and Analysis    2
Overview    2
A description of each of the key policy elements    3
Gender roles and equality    4
Evidence-based recommendations    6
Reference    8
Introduction
Although they make up half of the world's population, women have disproportionately higher rates of health and social problems. Following the successful execution of the First National Women's Health Policy, which was formed in 1989, the National Women's
Health Strategy 2020-2030 was formulated. The National Women's Health Strategy 2020–2030 aims to "continue to enhance the health wellbeing of all women in Australia, particularly those at greatest risk of poor health (National Women’s Health Strategy,2020-2030)." The newly formulated strategy takes a two-pronged approach, focusing on both the health problems that already exist or are on the horizon and the health inequities caused by the socioeconomic determinants of health. This article will help readers better comprehend the National Women's Health Strategy 2020-2030 and critically appraise the most pressing health issues confronting Australian women now and in the not-too-distant future (National Women’s Health Strategy,2020-2030). There will be an examination of the policy's efficacy and a discussion of the problem's historical background, as well as references and evidence to back up claims and a recognition of key players. The goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the National Women's Health Strategy for the years 2020-2030.
Critical Discussion and Analysis
Overview
Understanding the impact of the First National Women's Health Policy on the health and wellbeing of Australian women is essential to a thorough examination of the National Women's Health Strategy for 2020–2030. Female life expectancy in Australia has increased relative to other nations as a result of the policy's effective execution. Much of this improvement is due to the advantages brought forth by a well-developed health care system and the wide distribution of effective drugs (National Women’s Health Strategy,2020-2030). The First National Health Strategy has worked on and, to some degree, succeeded in addressing the seven priority health problems for women. These concerns include sexuality and reproductive health, the health of ageing women, mental and emotional well-being violence against women, workplace health and safety, the health needs of women who are carers, and the health repercussions of sex-role stereotyping on women. The First National Health Strategy has worked on and, to some degree, succeeded in addressing these concerns. Successes of the policy include a drop in the rates of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and smoking (Azzopardi et al,2018).
It is undeniable that the First National Women's Health Policy has enhanced the health and longevity of Australian women by addressing seven key health concerns, however many women remain at a health disadvantage. According to the research, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women continue to face discrimination and inequality in the workplace. The research also showed that the primary causes for these subgroups of women were a dearth of health and wellness education, obstacles to receiving medical care, and inadequate pharmacological treatment (Borchers Arriagada et al,2020). To have a better grasp on this problem, it's important to recognise the many socioeconomic factors that may affect different groups of Australian women's access to the means necessary to achieve and maintain optimal health.
As a result of its obsolescence, it was also crucial to revise and update the National Women's Health Policy. Over the last decade and a half, women in Australia have seen significant social, economic, and technical development (2010-2022). In 2022, society faced very different issues, difficulties, solutions, and responses than in 2010. This meant that the Australian Department of Health and Ageing needed to formulate a strategy to deal with the problems that now face and will continue to face all Australian women (National Women’s Health Strategy,2020-2030).
In order to design and implement a plan that can be utilised for the next two decades, the National Women's Health strategy development team concentrated on tackling problems from two different angles. The first step was to identify existing and potential health issues and implement solutions. These health issues are divided into four categories: psychological wellbeing, sexual and reproductive, chronic illness prevention, and healthy ageing (National Women’s Health...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here