Criteria
|
Weak
|
Moderate
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Introduction
|
Only a brief statement of the purpose of the assignment was given. |
The introduction stated the purpose of the assignment but there was limited description |
The introduction clearly stated the purpose of the assignment with concise description but some aspects mentioned in the question are left out. |
The introduction clearly stated the purpose of the assignment with concise description
|
Justification the importance of GUI in Linux
|
Poor justification Contained factual errors |
Basic/Minimal justification with no examples |
Good justification but it can be improved further Adequate examples were given |
In depth justification with excellent examples The facts were coherent and clearly presented |
Description of THREE WM
|
Poor discussion Contained factual errors |
Basic/Minimal discussion with no examples |
Good discussion that is related to the scenario but it can be improved further Adequate examples were given
OR
Excellent discussion but there is room for improvement |
In depth discussion with excellent examples The facts were coherent and clearly presented |
Comparison of WMs: Features
|
Comparison contained only minimal points |
Fairly good comparison NOT supported by references |
Very good comparison NOT supported by correct references;
OR
Fairly good explanation supported by references;
OR
Excellent comparison but there is room for improvement
|
Very good comparison supported by relevant and correct references
|
|
Comparison of WMs: Advantages
|
Comparison contained only minimal points |
Fairly good comparison NOT supported by references |
Very good comparison NOT supported by correct references;
OR
Fairly good explanation supported by references;
OR
Excellent comparison but there is room for improvement |
Very good comparison supported by relevant and correct references |
Comparison of WMs: Disadvantages
|
Comparison contained only minimal points |
Fairly good comparison NOT supported by references |
Very good comparison NOT supported by correct references;
OR
Fairly good explanation supported by references;
OR
Excellent comparison but there is room for improvement |
Very good comparison supported by relevant and correct references |
Conclusion
|
Summed up only a few issues in the assignment
|
Summed up many of the main issues in the assignment
|
Summed up most of the main issues in the assignment
|
Summed up all the main issues in the assignment
|
Report
|
Some report formats are available but not correct. |
Most report formats are available but only some are correct. |
Most report formats are available and most are correct. |
All report formats are available and all are correct. |