this should be make according to marking criteria and no plagiarism.
Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa March, 2018 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2018 Unit Code MN603 Unit Title Wireless Networks and Security Assessment Type Individual Assignment 1 Assessment Title Evaluation of Wireless Communication technologies and wireless communication standards for Cyber-Physical Systems and the Internet of Things Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) The purpose of the assignment is to compare the wireless communication technologies and evaluate the wireless communication standards for Cyber- Physical Systems and Internet of Things. Students will be able to complete the following ULOs: b. Compare standards-based technologies used in various networks; c. Test and evaluate various wireless networks performance; Weight 10% Total Marks 70 Word limit 1500 – 2000 words Due Date 1/5/2018 11:55PM Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy- Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure MN603 Wireless Networks and Security Page#2 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa March, 2018 Assignment Description Wireless sensors and actuators connected by the Internet of Things (IoT) are central to the design of cyber-physical systems. Such systems require meeting strict requirements of throughput, latency and range, while maintaining low energy consumption and providing high levels of security. Wireless communication technologies provide a platform for the foundation of such systems. Understanding of the wireless communication principles and the wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things is essential for the design of such systems. For further reading, could refer to the article “Wireless Communication and Security Issues for Cyber– Physical Systems and the Internet-of-Things” [1]. The article is available on the IEEE Explore platform, which could be accessed via the Melbourne Institute of Technology Library. The assessment requires the students to compare wireless communication technologies and evaluate the wireless communication standards for wireless cyber physical systems and internet of things. The students are required to submit a report, which includes: 1. Comparison of wireless communication technologies in terms of: a. Communication spectrum b. modulation techniques c. medium access control mechanism d. network topologies 2. Evaluate wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things including: a. UHF RFID and NFC b. ZigBee, Z-Wave c. Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy d. Cellular Systems e. IEEE 802.11P f. Low-Power Wide Area Networks 3. Wireless Network Performance Based on your evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things, identify the standard which provides the best network performance. Justify your selection. References [1] A. Burg, A. Chattopadhyay and K. Y. Lam, "Wireless Communication and Security Issues for Cyber–Physical Systems and the Internet-of-Things," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 38-60, Jan. 2018. MN603 Wireless Networks and Security Page#3 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa March, 2018 Marking criteria: Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Introduction Outline of the report ( in 3-4 sentences) 5 Report Layout Report layout, style and language 5 Comparison of wireless communication technologies Comparison of wireless communication technologies in terms of: a. Communication spectrum b. Modulation techniques c. Medium access control mechanism d. Network topologies 20 Evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things Evaluate wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things including: a. UHF RFID and NFC b. ZigBee, Z-Wave c. Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy d. Cellular Systems e. IEEE 802.11P f. Low-Power Wide Area Networks 30 Wireless Network performance Based on your evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things, identify the standard which provides the best network performance. Justify your selection. 5 Conclusion Write summary of the report 5 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 Total 75 Marking Rubric for Assignment #1: Total Marks 75 Grade Mark HD 56-70 DI 49-55 CR 42-48 P 35-41 Fail<35 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory introduction /5 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics are relevant and soundly analysed. generally relevant and analysed. some relevance and briefly presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. report layout /5 exceptional report layout, style and language used very good report layout, style and language used good report layout, style and language used acceptable report layout, style and language used. poor report layout, style and language used. comparison of wireless communication technologies /20 finding is clearly linked and well justified finding is clearly linked and justified finding is linked and convincing finding is not linked and unjustified finding is not available mn603 wireless networks and security page#4 of 4 prepared by: dr javed ali baloch moderated by: a/prof savitri bevinakoppa march, 2018 evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things /30 exceptional evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards good evaluation of wireless communicat ion standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards evaluation of a few wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot unable to evaluate wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot wireless network performance /5 identified the wireless communication standard and provided excellent justification identified the wireless communicat ion standard and provided good justification identified the wireless communication standard and provided valid justification identified the wireless communication standard and failed to provide valid justification failed, to identify the wireless communication standard and provide justification conclusion /5 logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments consistency logical and convincing mostly consistent logical and convincing adequate cohesion and conviction argument is confused and disjointed reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors prepared by: dr shaleeza sohail moderated by: dr nandini sidnal march, 2018 assessment details and submission guidelines trimester t1 - 2018 unit code mn504 unit title networked application management assessment type individual assignment assessment title critical analysis and problem solving in networked application management purpose of the assessment (with ulo mapping) the purpose of this assignment is to develop skills of analysing critically, and problem solving in regard to networked application management (nam). students will be able to complete the following ulos: b. apply socio-technical contexts in modern network applications and management; c. utilise common and emerging types of middleware to design and manage networked applications; weight 10% total marks 50 word limit 1500 - 2000 due date 04/05/2018 11:55pm (friday week 7) submission guidelines all work must be submitted on moodle by the due date along with a title page. the assignment must be in ms word format, 1 excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" introduction="" 5="" all="" topics="" are="" pertinent="" and="" covered="" in="" depth.="" ability="" to="" think="" critically="" and="" source="" material="" is="" demonstrated="" topics="" are="" relevant="" and="" soundly="" analysed.="" generally="" relevant="" and="" analysed.="" some="" relevance="" and="" briefly="" presented.="" this="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" the="" assignment="" topic.="" report="" layout="" 5="" exceptional="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" very="" good="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" good="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used="" acceptable="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used.="" poor="" report="" layout,="" style="" and="" language="" used.="" comparison="" of="" wireless="" communication="" technologies="" 20="" finding="" is="" clearly="" linked="" and="" well="" justified="" finding="" is="" clearly="" linked="" and="" justified="" finding="" is="" linked="" and="" convincing="" finding="" is="" not="" linked="" and="" unjustified="" finding="" is="" not="" available="" mn603="" wireless="" networks="" and="" security="" page#4="" of="" 4="" prepared="" by:="" dr="" javed="" ali="" baloch="" moderated="" by:="" a/prof="" savitri="" bevinakoppa="" march,="" 2018="" evaluation="" of="" wireless="" communication="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" internet="" of="" things="" 30="" exceptional="" evaluation="" of="" wireless="" communication="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" iot="" including="" all="" described="" standards="" good="" evaluation="" of="" wireless="" communicat="" ion="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" iot="" including="" all="" described="" standards="" evaluation="" of="" wireless="" communication="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" iot="" including="" all="" described="" standards="" evaluation="" of="" a="" few="" wireless="" communication="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" iot="" unable="" to="" evaluate="" wireless="" communication="" standards="" for="" cyber="" physical="" systems="" and="" iot="" wireless="" network="" performance="" 5="" identified="" the="" wireless="" communication="" standard="" and="" provided="" excellent="" justification="" identified="" the="" wireless="" communicat="" ion="" standard="" and="" provided="" good="" justification="" identified="" the="" wireless="" communication="" standard="" and="" provided="" valid="" justification="" identified="" the="" wireless="" communication="" standard="" and="" failed="" to="" provide="" valid="" justification="" failed,="" to="" identify="" the="" wireless="" communication="" standard="" and="" provide="" justification="" conclusion="" 5="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" consistency="" logical="" and="" convincing="" mostly="" consistent="" logical="" and="" convincing="" adequate="" cohesion="" and="" conviction="" argument="" is="" confused="" and="" disjointed="" reference="" style="" 5="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing="" style="" sometimes="" clear="" referencing="" style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="" errors="" prepared="" by:="" dr="" shaleeza="" sohail="" moderated="" by:="" dr="" nandini="" sidnal="" march,="" 2018="" assessment="" details="" and="" submission="" guidelines="" trimester="" t1="" -="" 2018="" unit="" code="" mn504="" unit="" title="" networked="" application="" management="" assessment="" type="" individual="" assignment="" assessment="" title="" critical="" analysis="" and="" problem="" solving="" in="" networked="" application="" management="" purpose="" of="" the="" assessment="" (with="" ulo="" mapping)="" the="" purpose="" of="" this="" assignment="" is="" to="" develop="" skills="" of="" analysing="" critically,="" and="" problem="" solving="" in="" regard="" to="" networked="" application="" management="" (nam).="" students="" will="" be="" able="" to="" complete="" the="" following="" ulos:="" b.="" apply="" socio-technical="" contexts="" in="" modern="" network="" applications="" and="" management;="" c.="" utilise="" common="" and="" emerging="" types="" of="" middleware="" to="" design="" and="" manage="" networked="" applications;="" weight="" 10%="" total="" marks="" 50="" word="" limit="" 1500="" -="" 2000="" due="" date="" 04/05/2018="" 11:55pm="" (friday="" week="" 7)="" submission="" guidelines="" ="" all="" work="" must="" be="" submitted="" on="" moodle="" by="" the="" due="" date="" along="" with="" a="" title="" page.="" ="" the="" assignment="" must="" be="" in="" ms="" word="" format,="">35 excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory introduction /5 all topics are pertinent and covered in depth. ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated topics are relevant and soundly analysed. generally relevant and analysed. some relevance and briefly presented. this is not relevant to the assignment topic. report layout /5 exceptional report layout, style and language used very good report layout, style and language used good report layout, style and language used acceptable report layout, style and language used. poor report layout, style and language used. comparison of wireless communication technologies /20 finding is clearly linked and well justified finding is clearly linked and justified finding is linked and convincing finding is not linked and unjustified finding is not available mn603 wireless networks and security page#4 of 4 prepared by: dr javed ali baloch moderated by: a/prof savitri bevinakoppa march, 2018 evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and internet of things /30 exceptional evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards good evaluation of wireless communicat ion standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards evaluation of wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot including all described standards evaluation of a few wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot unable to evaluate wireless communication standards for cyber physical systems and iot wireless network performance /5 identified the wireless communication standard and provided excellent justification identified the wireless communicat ion standard and provided good justification identified the wireless communication standard and provided valid justification identified the wireless communication standard and failed to provide valid justification failed, to identify the wireless communication standard and provide justification conclusion /5 logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments consistency logical and convincing mostly consistent logical and convincing adequate cohesion and conviction argument is confused and disjointed reference style /5 clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing style generally good referencing style sometimes clear referencing style lacks consistency with many errors prepared by: dr shaleeza sohail moderated by: dr nandini sidnal march, 2018 assessment details and submission guidelines trimester t1 - 2018 unit code mn504 unit title networked application management assessment type individual assignment assessment title critical analysis and problem solving in networked application management purpose of the assessment (with ulo mapping) the purpose of this assignment is to develop skills of analysing critically, and problem solving in regard to networked application management (nam). students will be able to complete the following ulos: b. apply socio-technical contexts in modern network applications and management; c. utilise common and emerging types of middleware to design and manage networked applications; weight 10% total marks 50 word limit 1500 - 2000 due date 04/05/2018 11:55pm (friday week 7) submission guidelines all work must be submitted on moodle by the due date along with a title page. the assignment must be in ms word format, 1>