This question has four parts:
2.2.1 What is the ‘conclusion’ of Hans’s argument? What is he trying to persuade his teacher to accept?
2.2.2 What reasons does he give in support of his conclusion?
2.2.3 Does he make any implicit assumptions? Does he assume anything without actually saying it?
2.2.4 Finally, you might also like to say whether you think it is a good or a bad argument, though that is really going further than just trying to identify what the argument is.
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here