This problem considers the question, why not use UL instead of LU? You can assume thatAis a 2 × 2 matrix.
(a) Find a Doolittle version of the factorizationA=UL, whereLis a unit lower triangular matrix andUis upper triangular. You can assume pivoting is not necessary.
(b) Describe the resulting algorithm for solvingAx=b.
(c) Is there any connection between the Doolittle factorization ofATand the one you found in part (a)?
(d) Aside from an alphabetic advantage, is there any reason to prefer LU over UL?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here