This is an annotated bibliography. The topic chosen is Gender. I have attached the template that...

Question

This is an annotated bibliography. The topic chosen is Gender. I have attached the template that MUST be used to complete this assignment. I've also attached the rubrics.

700156 Crime, Deviance and Society | Annotated Bibliography Template ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Students are to use this template if they are using the case R v Mulvihill (domestic violence) and Gender to focus on. PART A | You must annotate the news article linked to Module 8 – Gender Theory. You are required to annotate this article. You may use the court hearing to further your knowledge and understanding of the case study (cite accordingly) News Article | Phillips, J., 2014, ‘Domestic violence: Rachelle Yeo's father urges men to address 'national human rights disaster'’ in ABC News, May 6, available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-06/rachelle-yeos-father-pleads-for-change/5427002?section=nsw Court hearing | R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014 Your annotation should consist of a succinct description of the case study and concisely evaluate connections to the theoretical framework (Approx. 250 words) PART B | Research and annotated ONE scholarly (academic) source. This source must NOT be the set reading or the given court hearing/article linked to the essay question. Source (Using Harvard Referencing WSU Guide ) Your annotation should consist of a succinct summary of the scholarly (academic article) and concisely evaluate its content and relevance to the case study and the appropriate theoretical framework. (Approx. 250 words) 700156 Crime, Deviance and Society MARKING RUBRIC: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY CRITERIA 1 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION PART A Provide a succint annotation of the appropriate case study/article (25%) Fails to clearly summarise the appropriate case study. Many features of the annotation are missing. Case study description is generic, not specifically identifying key features and makes loose connections to the theoretical framework Case study is succinctly described and covers the key features. Includes limited engagement with the theoretical framework and makes some general connections to the theoretical framework Case study is summarised with most of the key contents. Includes clear and explicit connections to the theoretical framework. This may be done inconsistently. Case study is concise and precisely identifies connections to the theoretical framework This is done consistently. CRITERIA 2 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION PART B Provide a succint annotation of an independently chosen source (35%) Source cited IS not scholarly. Source is scholarly but does not relate to the correct theoretical framework or case study Many features of the annotation are missing. Source is scholarly and broadly to theoretical framework. Basic understanding of the key features is presented Identifies key features and makes loose connections to the theoretical framework Source is scholarly and broadly connects to theoretical framework. Annotation succinctly covers the key features. Includes limited engagement with the theoretical framework and makes some general connections to the theoretical framework. Source is scholarly and connects to the theoretical framework. Features of the annotation are all present & explicitly recorded in succinct detail. Includes clear and explicit connections to the theoretical framework. This may be done inconsistently. Source is scholarly and connects to theoretical framework Evidence of deep understanding of the source is conveyed in the detailed & thoughtful analysis of content Annotation is concise and precisely identifies connections to the theoretical framework CRITERIA 3 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION WRITTEN EXPRESSION Capacity to Communicate Ideas effectively (20%) Outside of word-limit. Written expression generally unclear, with frequent grammatical/spelling/punctuation and sentence construction errors. Academically unsuitable informal expression. Meaning of the response difficult to read/follow. Within word-limit. Clarity of written expression adequate, although elements are present throughout which make the meaning less clear. These may include: - spelling and punctuation; - sentence structure and order (syntax); - sentence grammar and informal expression. Meaning of the response generally able to be followed although some aspects unclear and detract from the whole response. Within word-limit. Clarity of written expression consistent, with good attempt at formal academic writing style - no colloquial language present. Meaning is largely clear and easily followed, with occasional lapses. Response has been proof-read, with infrequent and minor spelling, punctuation, grammar and/or construction errors which do not detract from the whole response. Within word-limit. Clarity of written expression consistent, with formal academic writing style present. Meaning is clear and easily followed, with very few lapses. Response has been proof- read, with infrequent and minor spelling, punctuation, grammar and/or construction errors Within word-limit. Sophisticated academic writing style with varied articulation of ideas and clarity of meaning. Response has been skilfully proof- read and prepared with care and attention to detail. CRITERIA 4 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION REFERENCING & CITATIONS Uses the Harvard WesternSydU referencing guide as instructed in the Learning Guide (20%) WSU Harvard Style absent or very minimally and incorrectly attempted. Citations/acknowledgements absent or minimally attempted and incorrectly applied. Reference list absent or minimally applied/directly copied from non-compliant source. Internet sources absent or incorrectly cited. Attempt at WSU Harvard Style. Inconsistencies in citing paraphrased or quoted material. Some attempt at providing correctly formatted reference list. Some attempt at referencing Internet sources. Compliance with WSU Harvard Style, with some minor inconsistencies in referencing and citations. Paraphrasing consistently acknowledged, and correctly cited with only minor inconsistencies. All sources, including Internet sources, mostly correctly cited in Reference list. Compliance with WSU Harvard Style, with consistently correct referencing and citations. All quotations and paraphrasing acknowledged, and correctly cited. All sources, including Internet sources, correctly cited in Reference list. Complete compliance with WSU Harvard Style, with consistently correct referencing and citations. All quotations and paraphrasing skilfully acknowledged, and correctly cited. All sources, including Internet sources, correctly cited in Reference list.

template-annotated-bibliography-gender-theory1-ykk51pyw.docx marking-rubric-annotated-bibliography2-xrlog3xa.pdf

Soumi · Accepted Answer

700156 Crime, Deviance and Society | Annotated Bibliography Template
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Students are to use this template if they are using the case R v Mulvihill (domestic violence) and Gender to focus on. 
PART A | You must annotate the news article linked to Module 8 – Gender Theory. 
	You are required to annotate this article. You may use the court hearing to further your knowledge and understanding of the case study (cite accordingly)
	News Article | Phillips, J., 2014, ‘Domestic violence: Rachelle Yeo's father urges men to address 'national human rights disaster'’ in ABC News, May 6, available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-06/rachelle-yeos-father-pleads-for-change/5427002?section=nsw 
Court hearing | R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014
	Your annotation should consist of a succinct description of the case study and concisely evaluate connections to the theoretical framework
(Approx. 250 words)
	The present annotation is concerned with the case of Rachelle Yeo and Paul Mulvihill, where Yeo was brutally murdered by her former boyfriend Mulvihill, out of domestic violence. As stated by Phillips (2014) in ABC News, Yeo was an independent woman working in Australia, who was full of life. She was also not like those other women,

700156 Crime, Deviance and Society | Annotated Bibliography Template ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Students are to use this template if they are using the case R v Mulvihill (domestic violence) and Gender to...

Answer To: 700156 Crime, Deviance and Society | Annotated Bibliography Template ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Students...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment