This is a technical report. I want around 15 references as minimum requirement is 10. Im also attaching the marking rubric as i want to score 80+ marks according to that. And also i want all the requirements which are mentioned and also should include the points which is needed and mentioned in marking rubric. Can i know the price for that?
FIT9135 Assignment 1 Rubric.xlsx Part2 Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 50%-59% 60%-69% 70%-79% 80%-100% The report has a clear structure and consists of well composed paragraphs that are linked logically. The report has a very clear structure and consists of very well composed paragraphs that are linked logically. Section headings are used effectively to clarify the writing. The writing has a clear and logically formed narrative as a whole. Section headings are used effectively and accurately to clarify the writing. The writing has a very clear and logically formed narrative as a whole. Figures and Tables 5 No figures or tables have been used. No figures or tables have been used. Figures or tables have been used, but are unclear or do not always help understanding the text (too much/too little detail). Figures or tables have been used efficiently and complement the writing, but may contain too much or too little detail. The report makes excellent use of figures or tables, which appropriately complement the writing. Marks (in %)Criteria Marks (in %) Fail Structure 10 The report has an unclear structure, paragraphs do not flow logically, headings, if used, do not clarify the writing. The writing does not have a clear narrative. Language and Grammar 10 The style and vocabulary used in the writing are not accurate or articulate, and the writing may consist of poorly structured sentences with frequent grammatical errors. The style and vocabulary used in the writing are not accurate or articulate most of time, and the writing, while still able to be followed, may contain some grammatical errors. The style and vocabulary used in the writing is often not accurate or articulate, while the writing consists in the main of clearly structured sentences with few to no grammatical errors. The style and vocabulary used in the writing are generally accurate and articulate, and the writing consists of clearly structured sentences without noteworthy grammatical errors. The style and vocabulary used in the writing are consistently accurate and articulate, and the writing consists of clearly structured sentences with no grammatical errors. The report has some structure, but paragraphs are not developed, structured and/or linked logically throughout. Section headings are not used effectively to clarify the writing. The writing has a tenuously logical narrative as a whole. The report has a mostly clear structure and consists of mostly well composed paragraphs that are in most cases linked logically. Section headings are used mostly effectively to clarify the writing. The writing has a logical narrative as a whole. Referencing 10 No sources given (e.g. parts copied from web without citation), or sources are inadequate. At least two sources are cited, which may be somewhat inadequate and/or include referencing errors. The report does not always show clear understanding of the sources. At least three sources are cited, which are mostly adequate, and the student follows the requirements for citing, with some errors. At least four sources are cited, at least one of which is not an Internet resource, and the student follows the requirements for citing with only minor errors. At least five sources are cited, at least two of which are not Internet resources, and the student follows the requirements for citing and referencing. Description of technology options 20 Insufficient or largely incorrect description of technology options. The report correctly describes technology options, but with too little detail. The report correctly describes technology options with sufficient detail. The report correctly describes technology options with appropriate detail, and contains some explanation how they relate to the requirements. The report correctly describes technology options with appropriate detail, and explains well how they relate to the requirements. Comparison of technology options 25 No comparison of technologies attempted. Some comparison has been attempted, but may be incorrect or focus on irrelevant features. The report contains a comparison of technology options, but at a superficial level, or only compares them at a technical or financial level but not both. The report contains a comparison of technology options, with some depth in terms of both technological and financial aspects. The report contains a comparison of technology options, with excellent depth in terms of both technological and financial aspects. Recommendations 10 No recommendations are attempted, or recommendations are inadequate, don’t relate to specified requirements. Some recommendations are given, but are not supported by evidence or argumentation. Recommendations are given, but may lack sufficient substantiation or are not well argued. Recommendation s are given and are reasonably argued and substantiated with some evidence. Recommendations are given and are well argued and substantiated with appropriate evidence. The report looks professional and includes the expected structural elements (e.g. introduction, recommendations , conclusion). The report looks very professional and expertly includes the expected structural elements (e.g. introduction, recommendations, conclusion). Overall presentation 10 The report has an unclear format, looks unprofessional. The document has some attempt at a format, but neglects most structural requirements. The document has a readable format and follows some of the structural requirements. B. Technical Report Based on the scenario you find below, you are to write a technical report for the senior executive of the company you work in, evaluating different technologies to meet the company’s networking requirements. The rest of this specification is organised into two parts: 1) the scenario, which explains the situation of the (imaginary) company you work for, and 2) the instructions how you should approach this task. 1. Scenario Your role / company overview: You work in the IT department of DataAnalytics.AU, a start-up company that was spun out of Monash University with around 20 employees in Melbourne. The company is offering data analysis services, where customers can upload large data sets and access customised visual analyses through a web site. Your company is growing fast, and the plan is to move into new offices within the next few months. You were hired as a user interface specialist, but when the CIO (Chief Information Officer) found out that you did FIT9135 as part of your Master’s degree, she gave you the task to design the network infrastructure for the new offices. 2 Network requirements: 1. Up to now, the company was operating its own web server in a Monash data centre. The projected growth in customers and staff means that a dedicated, more powerful server will be required. The company is considering hosting its own servers or paying for an “on- demand computing platform” such as Amazon Web Services, DigitalOcean, Linode etc. 2. The new office space is located in an old warehouse, and you need to decide what kind of local network infrastructure should be installed. In addition to potentially supporting the company servers, the local network infrastructure needs to support a dynamic work environment, where staff don’t have assigned offices but move around with their laptops to work in small groups. 3. The new office space needs to be connected to the Internet. Your task: For the first requirement, your task is to do some research on the advantages and disadvantages of hosting your own server versus using online services. The second and third requirements are linked to the first one. If the company decides to host their own servers, that may have an impact on the required local network infrastructure and Internet connection. Research and analysis expected in the report: · The CIO wants to be informed about the options at a technical level. However, they expect you to give them enough arguments to also convince their investors, in particular with respect to costs and benefits of any new technology. · Go into some technical detail to explain differences between technologies. It will be useful to create tables for some of the comparisons. You can answer questions such as o Whatdevicesareinvolvedineachoptionandwhataretheirfunctions? o How does hosting your own servers compare to online platforms in terms of scalability, reliability, and up-front versus long-term costs? o Whatkindof(wiredandwireless)networktechnologyshouldbeinstalledinthenewoffice space in order to facilitate the mobility of the staff? o What are the available upstream and downstream capacities of different Internet providers? Is the technology scalable and future-proof, i.e., can we buy more capacity later without investing in expensive new hardware? 2. Instructions Writing reports is an essential aspect of any IT career. You will be expected to deliver reports that are accurate and factual, that provide evidence for your findings, and that look professional. Before you start Before starting to write, think about your audience, i.e., who is reading the report? Don’t write for your tutors. Write for your CIO and his team! Carefully read the marking rubric on Moodle (FIT9135 Assignment 1, Part 2, Marking Rubric pdf file) to find out what we expect you to write for the different grades. Sources and referencing Any claims or recommendations that you make should substantiated with supporting references. That means that you cannot just claim that A is better than B, you have to argue why that is the case and point to external sources that can serve as evidence. You can use the unit’s textbook and other standard literature as sources, but you will also need to use additional documentation to find all the technical information and commercial details for this report. Whenever you use material from an external source, make sure that you reference that source. You also need to assess the quality and reliability of the source – e.g., a company might say that their product is better