This assignment divided into 3 parts Refrences words not included in 2000 words Deadline 10 april Weighting 60% You have the opportunity to submit a draft plan of your assignment part 1. You will need...

i just upload the file


This assignment divided into 3 parts Refrences words not included in 2000 words Deadline 10 april Weighting 60% You have the opportunity to submit a draft plan of your assignment part 1. You will need to provide an outline of your proposed case study. The plan should not be more than two pages and provides a brief description of what you will present in each section of your final case study. · Part 1. The preliminary work for this assignment involves choosing a social issue that you are interested in exploring further (eg. elder abuse, marriage equality, disability discrimination, climate change, asylum seekers, gender equity, bullying, children in detention etc. Ideally choose an issue that matters to you but something that you could realistically begin to change through advocacy. For example ending hunger and global poverty is too big but ensuring all children who attend your local school have access to a healthy breakfast might be achievable. Your first task is to use a range of literature to gather information on this social issue including: · A definition of the problem and explanations about the causes of the problem ·  Information about the problems and challenges experienced by those effected · The size or scale of the issue and the setting or context in which this issue is being examined (eg. schools, family, workplace, church, community)   Part 2. In the second part you need to explain the social justice or human rights issues implicated in the social issue you have selected. Consider the power relations inherent in the situation and how they might be addressed through advocacy. Part 3. In part three you develop a hypothetical plan for advocacy action for addressing the social issue that you have described earlier in the paper. Here you can use the framework for advocacy action identified during the semester to guide your plan of action. If you prefer to use another framework you may do so. In this plan you need to identify the change that your advocacy action seeks to achieve. You identify the types of advocacy that you will use and the methods or techniques that will be applied. You will need to identify who will be involved and a time-frame for action. Note: this paper should be presented in a formal academic style of writing. A range of citation sources should be used with at least three sources from the unit reading list and five from other sources. Marking criteria Assessment Criteria PART A Information about content for each section of case study (30%) Well formulated and structured plan for PART B (20%) Clear, coherent written expression (25%) Preliminary reference list (25%)   Assessment Criteria PART B CRITERIA RUBRIC SCORE Accurate information about the issue or group (25) Accurate description of group/ issue/ problem Relevant definitions provided Up to date statistics provided Scale and scope of problem outlined clearly Impact on people described Causes of problem outline where appropriate Critical analysis of human rights or social justice and power relations (20) Considers relationships of power Refers to appropriate international conventions, and/or domestic legislation Considers social justice issues including any of the following: access, equity, participation, rights and responsibilities, fairness Analyses these issues rather than just describes or mentions them Well formulated and appropriate action plan (25) Applies a planning framework (week 2 lecture or/ and Rickets or other) and identifies appropriate steps for advocacy Strategies clearly outlines Timeline mentioned Identifies type of advocacy Implementation plan in form of table included (Who, what, when) Clear, coherent written expression and logical structure and organisation of information (20) Well structured- logical sequence of information Includes intro and conclusion Paragraphs and sections clearly linked Writing has no grammatical errors. Written work has no major errors in word selection and use, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization Written in an appropriate academic style Appropriate referencing (10) Correct style (APA, UC Library Guide) Minimum 8 references 3 references from essential readings appropriately integrated into paper ( These can include resources provided on Moodle each week) TOTAL/100 Total/45