Assessment Information 3 Subject Code: MAN302 Subject Name: Strategic Business Management Assessment Title: Assessment 3 – Develop an e-Portfolio that captures the elements of of developing and...

There is no word limit for the three questions. Please help me make a ppt. I prefer the second question to be a ppt. The first document is the assignment requirement and the second is another assignment, because the two assignments are related.Please Choose IDP company,IDP Education (Education) [www.idp.com]


Assessment Information 3 Subject Code: MAN302 Subject Name: Strategic Business Management Assessment Title: Assessment 3 – Develop an e-Portfolio that captures the elements of of developing and analysing strategy in an existing company Weighting: 40% Total Marks: 40 Submission: Via Moodle Due Date Four (4) staged submissions from Weeks 9 – 12 This Assessment will address the following Learning Outcomes: • LO1: Define dynamic capabilities and explain their role in both strategic change and a business's performance. • LO2: Explain the relationship between strategy formulation and implementation. • LO5: Develop a business strategy based on a comprehensive situational analysis. Assessment brief Building upon Assessment #1, each student will develop an e-Portfolio over a period of four (4) weeks that captures the elements of developing and analysing strategy in an existing company. Each stage will require the student to research a topic and then write a summary of what they have discovered through their research. In addition to the written narrative, students can embed images, diagrams or links to other electronically accessible materials such as websites or reports. Unlike normal written assessments, these summaries will be captured electronically and will be accessible to the lecturer to allow them to ask questions or provide comment. Students will then be encouraged to respond to the feedback they have received. Each week will be marked out of 10 marks. (30 marks) The presentation marks out of 10 in week 12. Note: You are to continue from you chose from any of the following companies. • Superloop (telecommunications) [www.superloop.com] • Mantra Group (Hotel) [www.mantragroup.com.au] • IDP Education (Education) [www.idp.com] • Collins Foods (Food) [www.collinsfoods.com] • Flight Centre (Travel) [www.flightcentre.com.au] • Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) (Professional Services) [www.pwc.com.au] Presentation: In week 12, you will be expected to give a 5-7-minute presentation to the class on one of the topics in your portfolio (Week 9 – 11). The maximum number of slides to use is 5 (this includes your title slide). Weekly Portfolio Questions Week 9 Technology impacts every organisation. How does technology specifically support the company’s value chain? What technologies have disrupted the industry the company is currently in? How have those technologies impacted the industry as well as the specific company? Being innovative, how can the company become an exponential organisation (ExO) using the framework developed by Salim Ismail? Do you think the company, in its current business model, will survive in the next 5 years? Why or why not? Week 10 Identify two business-level strategies that company utilises or can utilise in its current business model. Develop a brief outline and strategy canvas map that the company can use in developing a ‘Blue Ocean’ strategy. Week 11 Evaluate the company’s corporate level strategy. Choose a strategy that they have not seem to have pursued and discuss how it would be an advantage for them. Along with the corporate level strategy, discuss how it can be integrated into the existing global strategy (or a potential global strategy if there is not one in place already). Grading Scale This assessment will be marked using the attached rubric. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. For details on academic integrity policies and penalties, the reassessment process, and the appeals process, please refer to http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word count by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Success Centre representative or refer to the study help on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. You can find this by clicking on the top page toolbar: My Services>Academic Success Centre>Study Support Resources http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ Assessment (MAN302 Assessment 3) Note: each week will be marked out of 10 MARKS. The Presentation Mark in Week 12. Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%- 64% CR (Credit) 65%- 74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Structure / Theory / Quality of Content and Research Lacks logical flow and structure; Argument supported by theory sourced from non- academic literature. No discussion of academic research. Cites very few sources. Some errors in logical flow and structure; Argument supported by basic discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal number of academic sources. Little if any discussion of relevant research. Generally sound logical flow and structure; Argument supported by broad discussion of relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several academic sources. Very good logical flow and structure; Argument supported by detailed discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous academic sources. Excellent logical flow and structure; Argument supported by comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous quality academic sources. Academic writing style / Referencing / KBS Guidelines Writing style is unclear; lacks academic discipline; numerous spelling and grammatical errors. Several sources are unacknowledged. Major errors in format of references. Noncompliance with research scope guidelines. Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure; some use of discipline specific academic language. Several spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged most sources in the text and reference list. Some references in the incorrect format. Compliant with research scope guidelines. Writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged most sources in the text and reference list. Most references in the correct format. Compliant with research scope guidelines. Writing style is clear and concise; Correct use of discipline-specific academic language. Some minor spelling or grammatical errors. Acknowledged all sources in the text and in reference list. All references in correct format. Compliant with research scope guidelines. Writing style is very clear and concise; Fluent use of discipline specific academic language. No spelling or grammatical errors. Expert usage and acknowledgment of all sources in the text and in reference list. All references in the correct format. Compliant with research scope guidelines. Presentation (Week 12) Presentation (10 marks) Presents content with no PowerPoint or overhead slides. Presenter reads notes the entire time. Distracting gestures (fidgeting) while presenting. Excessive use of filler words (e.g. um, er, ah, like). Use of offensive language. Use of slang. Went overtime (did not finish at 7 minutes maximum) Had more than 5 slides Presenter uses graphics but are not supported by text or presentation. Text is too dense – too much info on slide. Presenter speaks in muffled voice. Some use of filler words. Audience members has difficulty understanding presentation. Went overtime (did not finish at 7 minutes maximum) Had more than 5 slides Presenter uses graphics but often differs from verbal presentation. Not summarised so presenter ends up reading off board. Voice is generally clear. Some reading off notes. Sometimes difficult to understand because of rushed speech. Went overtime (did not finish at 7 minutes maximum) Had more than 5 slides Text clearly summarises the key points. Graphics and text do not distract attention from the speaker or content. Use of visual aids consistent across entire presentation. Presenter shows expression consistent with presentation. Uses gestures to point out or highlight presentation materials Voice is clear. Little use of filler words. Acts in a professional manner. Kept to the time limit between 5 – 7 minutes Kept to the maximum number of slides (5) Graphics and text well integrated into presentation. Text is appropriate for the content. Visual presentation complements rather than dominates presentation. Presenter shows enthusiasm for their own work. Uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members would be able to understand presentation. Acts in a very professional manner. Kept to the time limit between 5 – 7 minutes Kept to the maximum number of slides (5) Name:YILANG CHEN Student id: 132948 MAN302 STRATEGIC BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Executive Summary3 Introduction4 Analysis4 Stakeholders and impact of the offshore shift on them5 Competitive advantage for the company due to offshore shift6 Issues with strategy7 Conclusion7 References8 Executive Summary Strategic management is a very targeted and efficient concept that can define the success or failure of any organisation. A proper planning and the execution of those policies is the driving force that can lead business to success. Expansion of business offshore occurs majorly due to two causes either to expand