There are a plethora of topics that we have covered in class that can be considered in your analysis of the case. You don't need to relate each one; rather select a couple of things that caught your...

1 answer below »






There are a plethora of topics that we have covered in class that can be considered in your analysis of the case. You don't need to relate each one; rather select a couple of things that caught your attention and explain the relevance.




  • Trace evidence (or lack thereof)


  • Professional biases


  • Interrogations / p
    olice deception


  • Polygraph tests / admissibility


  • Construction / reconstruction of memories


  • Leading or suggestive comments


  • Interviewing children


  • Children as eyewitnesses


  • Use of expert testimony



Submit the paper as a file attachment or cut and paste as a text entry via the "submit" button located on the top right side of this page.This paper is due by the end of the week.







Rubric





New Jersey v. Michaels Rubric






































New Jersey v. Michaels Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts




This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Spelling / Grammar





















20pts

No spelling or grammar errors










17pts

Very minor spelling errors / grammar errors - (less than 5).










10pts

Spelling errors of basic English (not using proper capitalization or punctuation)/ Minor grammar errors and/or using language that is not of an academic nature. Overall, the paper is still readable.










5pts

Sentences are incomplete and/or don't make sense (less than 5) but overall paper is readable.










0pts

The paper is not readable. Numerous sentences are either incomplete and/or don't make sense. The reader cannot understand the paper as written.








20pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Overview / Summary of the case





















20pts

The overview of the case was thorough and well explained.










15pts

What was presented of the case was accurate, but missing a few key points.










10pts

The review of the case was weak. It was missing key points










5pts

Provided a disjointed explanation of the case










0pts

Did not provide an overview of the case








20pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Pertinent Facts





















20pts

Provided pertinent facts prior to evaluating the information.










15pts

Nicely analyzed problems but failed to provide a factual foundation










10pts

Provided several important points but confused some of the facts.










5pts

Presented facts that were not correct about the case.










0pts

Failed to provide at least 3 pertinent facts of the case (with accuracy)








20pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Connection to Course Material

























40pts

Made at least four connections to course material and the analyses was strong.










35pts

Made four connections to course material but the analyses were weak.










30pts

Made three connections to course material and analyses were strong.










25pts

Made three connections to course material but the analyses were weak.










20pts

Made two connections to course material and the analyses were strong.










15pts

Made two connections to course material but the analyses were weak.










10pts

Make only one connection to course material with a strong analysis.










5pts

Made one connection to course material and the analysis was weak.










0pts

Did not connect the case to any course material.








40pts



Total Points:100








Answered Same DayOct 21, 2022

Answer To: There are a plethora of topics that we have covered in class that can be considered in your analysis...

Prince answered on Oct 21 2022
59 Votes
About Margaret Kelly
When Margaret Kelly Michaels decided to go from Pennsylvania to New Jersey, to stay with a friend, she was 24 years old. She answered to a job posting for a teacher's assistant a few weeks later. When she arr
ived for the interview, she learned that Wee Care, a daycare in New Jersey, was the employer. She was hired for a full-time teacher's assistant role in that company. She received a promotion to full-time prekindergarten teacher within a month. After that, she left on 26th April, 1985, to accept a position as a teacher close to her home.
Facts of the Case:
When a nurse used a rectal thermometer to take a 4-year-old child's temperature in April 1985, the boy remarked, "That was what my teacher did to me during nap time at school." All of the students at the Wee Care were interrogated after the comment was submitted to the local authorities. 51 daycare centre youngsters who provided testimony were interviewed by social workers and therapists. Children claimed during the interviews that Michaels made them suck peanut butter off her genitalia, poked knives, forks, and other items into their rectums and vaginas, made them eat cakes made of human excrement, and forced them to duck, duck, goose whilst naked. 235 charges of sexual misconduct against children and youth were included in Michaels' indictment.
Interrogations:
The prosecutor's office questioned five kids, four parents, four teachers, Wee Care aides and administrators, the doctor's helper, Alex's brother, as well as an adult friend of Alex's parents between May 2 and May 8, 1985. On May 6, at around 7:00 a.m., Detective Mastrangelo & Sergeant Noonan entered Michaels' apartment while she was getting ready for work without warning. She consented when they requested her to accompany them for questioning at the Essex County Prosecutor's office. Without legal representation, Michaels voluntarily answered every question for roughly nine hours at the prosecutor's office.
Physical examination of the kids were done, and no evidence of maltreatment was discovered. No parent has ever reported finding their child physically harmed. FBI tests revealed no evidence of wooden spoon penetration to the kids.
Polygraph tests
Michaels was informed by Mastrangelo and Noonan that she would be freed if...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here