Marking Criteria 7407ENG: Assessment item 2 (Essay) Version 1.2 Last updated: 10:45 AM 5/8/18. Criteria Weight Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Title 5% The title is appropriate and reflects...

There are 9 readings and with the help of them we need to do our own assignment on EMS in Australia by using and reflecting all those readings in our own view of new research


Marking Criteria 7407ENG: Assessment item 2 (Essay) Version 1.2 Last updated: 10:45 AM 5/8/18. Criteria Weight Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Title 5% The title is appropriate and reflects the content of the paper accurately. The title is appropriate but may lead to some confusion about the content The title is appropriate but may be over- promising The title is misleading and does not reflect the content of the paper Research Question 10% An appropriate research question is asked or a clear hypothesis is formulated. The research question is reasonably defined but may be simplistic or the hypothesis stated is not clearly stated. The research question is very generic or the hypothesis is ill defined. Research question is not defined or is a close question or the hypothesis is not stated. Readings Review 35% A good and accurate review of the reading list (all articles from all units) and appropriately presented and well synthesised within the context of the theme. A good review and accurate summary but is not comprehensive of all the reading list (up to 2 article are missing). Good synthesis of the material within the context of the theme. A summary of the readings is presented but some confusion is present. Some articles are not included in the review. Organisation and logical transmission between ideas may not be smooth. Poor summary or inaccurate summary of the readings. Relies heavily on literal quotes. Poor organisation of ideas. No attempt to link ideas in a logical flow. Discussion and reflection 20% High level of reflection on the ideas discussed in the readings. Synthesis of and assimilation of ideas from different sources Evidence of reflective practice on the ideas discussed in the readings. Evidence of analysis of the ideas from the different sources (within Some reflection is displayed but mainly descriptive. The research question is partially answered but the No reflection. Only descriptive. Mainly relying on direct quotes or repeating the ideas in the readings without proper (within the reading list) to formulate coherent argument. Research question is clearly answered. the readings) to formulate coherent argument to answer the research question or support the hypothesis but confusion is evident. argument is weak. analysis or critique. Conclusions 10% Conclusions are clear and are supported by the arguments presented in the paper. Conclusions are presented and are reasonably supported by the arguments presented in the paper. Conclusions are presented. They may be partially supported by the arguments presented in the paper. No conclusions or conclusions are very generic or conclusions are not supported by the argument presented in the paper. Language quality and length 10% Appropriate academic style English language is used. No or very minor grammatical and spelling mistakes. Conforms to the word limit (±10%). Academic style English language is used. Minor grammatical and spelling errors that does not affect the understanding of the work presented. Conforms to the word limit (±10%). Academic style English language is used. Multiple grammatical and spelling mistakes that may result in minor distraction from the meaning. Deviates from the word limit by up to ±15%. English language used but are not appropriate for academic style writing. Grammatical and spelling errors that distract from the understanding of the meaning. Deviates from the word limit by more than ±15%. Referencing 10% All references are appropriately cited in text and correctly listed in the reference list using APA or Harvard style referencing. All references are cited in the text and appropriately and correctly listed in the reference list using APA or Harvard style referencing. Some mistakes Generally references are cited in the text and appropriately listed in the reference list but referencing styles other than APA or Sources are not cited or incorrectly cited. No reference list or the reference list does not correspond to the in text citations. Only references listed in the reading list are used. in referencing may occur. Only references in the reading list are used. Harvard are used. Only references in the reading list are used. Wrong referencing style is used. References other than those provided in the reading list are used.