The textbook raises several objections to Aquinas’ two arguments. Using the two arguments you just wrote down, explain which premise each objection is trying to criticize. Some of the objections, for example, object to the way Aquinas interprets or understands the “fact” or “observation” to which he appeals. Others object to what Aquinas believes that fact or observation implies. When done, go on to the next question.
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here