The text says that one problem with the theory of inductionism is that any set of observations will support an infinite number of generalizations. Another is that inductionism can explain how...

The text says that one problem with the theory of inductionism is that any set of observations will support an infinite number of generalizations. Another is that inductionism can explain how observations support simple low-level laws, but it cannot explain how observations support the fundamental theories of science. Explain these problems. How do you think the inductionist would respond to these two criticisms?