The task is to write an analysis or reflection on a principle that connects with a fallacy. Choose one principle and explain how it helps you understand, articulate, and/or analyze a fallacy. For...

The task is to write an analysis or reflection on a principle that connects with a fallacy. Choose one principle and explain how it helps you understand, articulate, and/or analyze a fallacy. For examples: when an arguer makes a straw argument then they are violating the principle of charity, since they are misrepresenting an argument they are responding to (i.e. they are not being charitable), etc. Or, when an arguer begs the question, then they are violating the burden of proof principle, since they fail to provide proof for their conclusion, and the burden of proof states that the onus is on an arguer to provide evidence for their viewpoints, etc. Do the same - connect a fallacy (or a scheme of argument) you have studied in this course with an argument principle from this week's lecture document. You can use an example if it helps your reflection. You can think of implications of following the principle (or not following the principle) and how it connects with strong-argument making (or fallacy-making). DO NOT use either of the examples provided above. DO NOT repeat connections made by team members before you.

When referring to a fallacy or principle we have studied - you do not need to provide a reference.This reflective analysis does not require research - it requires you to think about concepts you've learned, make unique connections, and discuss them (approximately 200-300 words can achieve this). Failing this, if you do any outside research, then it must be cited using APA formatting.