the result of the three test have been upload in the files, need to attach my results in the assessment
MAN201_T3_2019_Assessment_3 Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MAN201 Subject Name: Organisational Behaviour Assessment Title: Individual Self-Analysis Assessment Type: Written Report Word Count: 1500 words (+/- 10%) Weighting: 30 % Total Marks: 30 Submission: Via Turnitin Due Date: Week 7 Monday at 3.55pm Your Task Each student is required to conduct the following personality self-assessment activities: • Myers Briggs Profile • Costa & McCrae Big 5 Personality Traits • McClelland Needs Analysis Learning Outcomes: LO1: Understand and apply the strategy of organisational behavioural theories and concepts to the workplace LO2: Understand how attitudes, personality, values, emotions and motivation impact the workplace. LO5: Reflect on your own learning and behavioural styles and use this knowledge to further develop your skills in lifelong learning and professional interactions. Assessment Description Over the first few weeks, you been asked to complete 3 self-analysis tools to assist you to develop an understanding of yourself. Based on your findings from these you will need to complete a critical self-analysis including: 1. Provide a brief review of your personal self-assessment findings. You will need to attach your results from each of the 3 self-assessment tools 2. Critically analyse the findings. A detailed critical analysis includes using a range of evidence, examples and references to explain and support your findings. In order to be able to analyse and apply the tools, you will need to be able to demonstrate an understanding of the theory associated with the personality self-assessment tools. 3. Reflect on your critical analysis and discuss what this means for you as a future leader or manager in a contemporary workplace. Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Assessment Instructions To ensure the success of your self-analysis, you should take account of the following headings: 1. Introduction (only one introduction is required for the report). (100 words) 2. Brief Review of your findings. Using the results of your self-analysis, clearly identify what you perceive as your strengths and weaknesses (400 words) 3. Critical analysis of the topics including a reflection on your future managerial or leadership skills in a contemporary workplace. You can choose to reflect on your current organisation or an organisation that you may want to work for in the future. (600 words) 4. Recommendations to enable areas of development based on perceived strengths and weaknesses. (300 words) 5. Conclusion (only one conclusion is required for the report). (100 words) Please refer to the Assessment Marking Guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria Important Study Information Reference guide: Use a minimum of five references. This must include weekly readings, and other readings from textbooks and journal articles. Referencing should be in the Harvard style – please refer to Kaplan’s ‘Harvard Referencing Guide’. KBS presentation guidelines: Arial, size 11 font, 1.5 spacing Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current- students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Assessment Marking Guide Criteria HD (High Distinction) DN (Distinction) CR (Credit) P (Pass) F (Fail) Clear identification and discussion of all self- assessment tools and results (8 Marks) The student has succinctly analysed and described the results of the tests thoroughly and also clearly identified strengths and weaknesses. The student has clearly analysed and described the results of the tests including identified strengths and weaknesses. The student’s tests are interesting and the self-analysis is present with a description of strengths and weaknesses. The student has undertaken the tests but hasn’t conducted the critical self-analysis required, the discussion of strengths and weaknesses are not well connected to the results. The student has not completed any psychometric tests or has not discussed them with enough substance. Clear analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills. (8 Marks) Excellent analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills, creating an exceptionally clear link with theory and examples. Good analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills, drawing a clear link with theory and examples. Satisfactory analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills. Some theory and examples were used. Little analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills. Theory and examples were lacking. No analysis of the findings in relation to one’s future managerial or leadership skills. Theory and examples were lacking. Reflection and recommendations /8 The discussion and description demonstrate insightful reflection and there is no doubt, by the way the areas for improvement and evidence are presented, that these will be resolved. The discussion and description demonstrate reflection, areas for improvement and evidence are of a high standard but would be more convincing if worded more clearly Whilst improvement is needed, the discussion and description demonstrate a mix of descriptive and reflective thinking, there is a solid attempt at linking the areas for improvement with the relevant theories Discussion is descriptive, the areas for improvement and supporting research are presented, but they are not convincing or well connected. Reflective discussion and areas for improvement are either missing or unrelated to the key question, and neither are they supported by research. Evidence of completion of all self-analysis tools (attached) (2 Marks) Evidence provided of completion of completion of the self-analysis tools (attached) Evidence provided of completion of completion of the self-analysis tools (attached) Evidence provided of completion of completion of the self-analysis tools (attached) Limited evidence (less than 3) provided of completion of completion of the self- analysis tools (attached) Evidence was not provided of completion of the self-analysis tools (attached) Academic Structure, writing style, research and referencing (4 Marks) Answer presented is exceptionally clear and logical. Writing quality is of an impeccable standard, with no errors. Harvard referencing is used correctly and the quality of research was excellent Answer presented is substantially clear and logical. Writing quality is of a high standard, with minimal errors. Impressive attempts are obvious in research/referencing, but there is scope for some improvement. Answer presented is sufficiently clear and logical. Writing quality is of a good standard, with some errors. Research/Referencing is adequate but inconsistencies exist. Answer presented is somewhat clear and logical. Writing quality is of a reasonable standard, but with numerous errors. Research/referencing is present but limited. Major improvements needed. Answer presented is not clear and logical. Writing quality is of an inadequate standard, with substantial errors. Research/referencing are either missing or have failed to meet the minimum standards of Assessment 1 Information Your Task Assessment Description Assessment Instructions Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy Word Limits for Written Assessments Study Assistance Assessment Marking Guide McClelland Needs Analysis Motivation Needs Class Exercise - UNDERSTANDING YOURSELF What are My Dominant Needs? This instrument was designed to deal with flaws in previous attempts to measure four individual needs: achievement, affiliation, autonomy and power. These are defined as follows: Achievement—The desire to excel and to improve on past performance. Affiliation—The desire to interact socially and to be accepted by others. Autonomy—The desire to be self-directed. Power—The desire to influence and direct others. INSTRUMENT This test contains 20 statements that may describe you and the types of things you may like to do. For each statement, indicate your agreement or disagreement using the following scale: 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither agree nor disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly agree 1. I try to perform my best at work. 1 2 3 4 5 2. I spend a lot of time talking to other people. 1 2 3 4 5 3. I would like a career where I have very little supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 4. I would enjoy being in charge of a project. 1 2 3 4 5 5. I am a hard worker. 1 2 3 4 5 6. I am a ‘people’ person. 1 2 3 4 5 7. I would like a job where I can plan my work schedule myself. 1 2 3 4 5 8. I would rather receive orders than give them. 1 2 3 4 5 9. It is important to me to do the best job possible. 1 2 3 4 5 10. When I have a choice, I try to work in a group instead of by myself. 1 2 3 4 5 11. I would like to be my own boss. 1