The purpose of this assignment is to allow students an opportunity to complete an evaluation of a peer’s research. Peer reviewing is a standard process in health care research today.In this...

1 answer below »



The purpose of this assignment is to allow students an opportunity to complete an evaluation of a peer’s research. Peer reviewing is a standard process in health care research today.


In this assignment, you will conduct peer reviews on the "Health Care Field Research Draft" assignment from Topic 2.



NOTE: Your instructor will assign you at least one other student’s draft to review. Once you have completed the “Health Care Field Research Peer Review” be sure to send it back to your peer for them to make the necessary changes.



  • When conducting the peer review, utilize the rubric from the Topic 2 assignment, "Health Care Field Research Draft” and the "HLT-317V Peer Review Guidelines" as resources. Complete the "HLT-317V Peer Review Template" for the writer(s) assigned to you. If you are reviewing more than one student’s rough draft, submit separate “HLT-317V Peer Review Templates” for each student.


Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.


This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.















Peer Review Worksheet   HLT-317V Peer Review Template Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This template will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit the template to your instructor through the LMS, and make sure that the writer gets a copy as well. Name of the Draft’s Author: Name of the Peer Reviewer: Summary: After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the rough draft in the box below.             Health Care Field Research Draft After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Health Care Field Research Draft rubric from Topic 2. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and is found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.) Introduction of the Topic · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence do you have for this score? Explanation of Research Articles as it Relates to the Allied Health Care Profession · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Ethical Considerations for Data Collection · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Explanation of What the Data Reveals in Terms of Statistical Analysis · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Topic of Interest · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Summary of the Conclusions from the Articles · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Thesis Development and Purpose · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Argument Logic and Construction · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Mechanics of Writing · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Paper Format · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Research Citations · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence from the paper do you have for this score? Three positive things about this paper are: 1) 2) 3) Three things that could be improved are: 1) 2) 3) © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. 2 © 20 20 . Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. HLT - 317V Peer Review Template Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This template will assist you in pr oviding that feedback. Submit the template to your instructor throu gh the LMS , and make sure that the writer gets a copy as well. Name of the Draft’s A uthor: Name of the Peer Reviewer: Summary: After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3 – 5 sentences) of the rough draft in the box below . Health Care Field Research Draft After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluat e the essay using the Health Care Field Research Draft rubric from Topic 2 . Determine the level of ac hievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement range s from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and is found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.) Introduction of the Topic · What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? · What evidence do you have for this score? Explanation of Research Articles as it Relates to the Allied Health Care Pr ofession · What level of achievement did the author score for this criteri on? © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. HLT-317V Peer Review Template Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This template will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit the template to your instructor through the LMS, and make sure that the writer gets a copy as well. Name of the Draft’s Author: Name of the Peer Reviewer: Summary: After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the rough draft in the box below. Health Care Field Research Draft After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Health Care Field Research Draft rubric from Topic 2. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and is found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.) Introduction of the Topic  What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?  What evidence do you have for this score? Explanation of Research Articles as it Relates to the Allied Health Care Profession  What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion? Peer Review Guidelines HLT-317V: Peer Review Guidelines What is a Peer Review? A peer review is the process of allowing another person to read your piece of writing in order to offer suggestions and feedback. This can happen at any stage of the writing process, but can be especially helpful during the revision stage. The peer reviewer often has a clear focus while they read, with the help of a rubric or a checklist, so that their feedback about strengths and weaknesses are specific. Why use Peer Reviewer? The greatest advantage for using a peer reviewer is the reciprocal benefit to both the reader and the writer. Obviously, having someone else review your material, or focus on specific aspects of your writing, will result in feedback that can help you improve your paper. Additionally, the peer reviewer benefits as well. First, the peer reviewer is able to see alternative ways of presenting the same material and learn new writing techniques, especially if the reviewer and writer are students submitting assignments for the same course. Second, the act of constructively reviewing another’s piece of writing—with the intention of providing specific feedback—allows the reviewer to see their own writing in a new and critical way. Both of these advantages for the reviewer can help improve their own writing. Responsibilities of the Writer As a writer, you should view this process as an opportunity to get constructive feedback from someone else. However, ultimately it is your piece of writing, so you must decide whether or not to make the changes suggested by the reviewer. Above all, you should be positive and open to accept the critical feedback of others, since the purpose is to help you improve your writing. Do not see the feedback as an attack on you but as an opportunity for learning how to make your writing better. Responsibilities of the Peer Reviewer As a reviewer, it is important to remember that you have been invited to help another person by giving feedback about their work. Writers can feel vulnerable during this process so be respectful and professional, but honest in your feedback. It’s a good rule of thumb to follow these five rules when reviewing another person’s paper: 1. Read the paper once without comments so that you get a feel for the whole piece. 2. Provide a focused summary of feedback that uses a rubric or a checklist to support your narrative comments. 3. Target big ideas or broad skills that will have a significant impact across the entire piece. For example, recommending that they reorganize certain parts so that the flow of ideas is smoother and more coherent is better than talking about the proper use of commas. 4. Use constructive criticism with sensitivity to the writer’s feelings by providing specific feedback about how to improve the piece, such as, “I liked this part and was wondering more about the context. Can you relate support of breast cancer awareness to the company’s mission or target market? How does the cause (breast cancer awareness) fit in with the company and what it is selling? How is this cause related to a social responsibility issue?” 5. Be sure to identify what’s “good” in the paper, as well as by being positive about the things the writer is doing correctly. Reinforce their efforts and those skills that make the piece effective. Think of the” sandwich approach,” or start by mentioning something good about their writing, then discuss some areas for improvement, and finish up with some suggestions for solving the weaknesses. © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Childhood Obesity – Research Draft Caeley Lordemann HLT-317V-O500: Communication and Application of Research in Practice Samantha Deck October 23th, 2022 Introduction Childhood obesity is on the rise and has been over the past couple decades. Obesity is a development of more than just weight. The number of obese children in the United States is troubling. Excessive weight is very dangerous in youth but often it continues into their adulthood. Childhood obesity is a condition in which children
hlt-317v-peerreviewtemplate-1vwx0axq.docx hlt-317v-peerreviewguidelines-k22bnbhn.doc childhood-obesity-draft-k5vhcdwf.docx
Answered Same DayNov 05, 2022

Answer To: The purpose of this assignment is to allow students an opportunity to complete an evaluation of a...

Dr. Sulabh answered on Nov 05 2022
48 Votes
Peer Review Worksheet
 1
3
Assignment
Review:
 
         The article mentions the harmful effects of obesity on the health of children. Obese children are prone to be bullied in a school or college. Further obese children are prone to the occurrence of several diseases like a rise in blood pressure, heart problems, and diabetes. The other factors contributing to the obesity problems include the exposure of children for long hours durations in front of television sets and the prevalence of COVID-19 infection leading to stagnation at home for many people.
 
 Introduction:
1. The level of achievement in the introduction is excellent as the author has mentioned the different factors contributing to the occurrence of obesity, heart problems, and diabetic problems.
2. The evidence includes the prevalence and the occurrence of obesity disease in people after watching television for longer time duration, COVID-19 infection problems, diet problems, and lifestyle problems. 
Explanation:
1. The level of achievement of the author in the allied healthcare professional is very good as the author discusses the different healthcare policies available for insuring the patient suffering from a disease. Further, the use of different healthcare data consisting of the disease diagnosis, signs, symptoms, and the prevalence of the disease in patients can be maintained in the form of electronic healthcare records. 
2. This paper mentions the significance and...
SOLUTION.PDF
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here
Have files?