The plaintiffs in this case (Stoneridge et al.) sought to portray the defendants (Scientific-Atlanta, Charter Communications, et al.) as primary under the theory that they participated in a “scheme” to defraud.
1. The Supreme Court rejected this theory for several reasons outlined in this case.What are those reasons? Explain.
2. Are these defrauders (defendants) to be allowed to get away with this? If not, how are they to be brought to justice?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here