the name of the subject is innovation and technology management. the project i have selected is Low...

Question

the name of the subject is innovation and technology management. the project i have selected is Low sulphur diesel project: spirit of tasmania. i have attached the assignment question below.

OENG1115, Assessment item 2: Innovation and technology management report (individual assessment) Weighting of final grade: 50% Related course learning outcomes: 3 Due date: 4th October 2019 at 11.55pm Assessment description: Based on the project concept, you will submit a report on your work integrating and applying key operational aspects of managing innovation and technology to a collaborative engineering project Assessment detail: Based on either project option 1 or option 2 you will prepare a detailed report for managing innovation and technology to deliver a specific and defendable operational outcome. You will: · Briefly research and outline a specific technology and/or an innovation that would benefit the project · Describe the succinct business case and risks underpinning why the project managers should consider proceeding with your approach · Outline a detailed strategy based on sound theoretical reasoning for sourcing / developing the technology or innovation and its integration / commercialization. You will also consider the longer term management post integration relevant to the project · Consider implications of intellectual property and its management if applicable · Consider organisational culture and key stakeholders (internal and external), supply chains if/as relevant and marketing / communications Your report will include a: · Clear description of the objective · Technical summary of the technology / innovation you have researched for the project · Defendable business case for the technology / innovation you have down selected · Detailed strategy / process to source through to reliably integrate the technology or innovation including consideration of project specific constraints, standards and codes, on-going management as relevant. · Intellectual property assessment and strategy if applicable · A process for engaging and convincing internal and external stakeholders · Discussion over organisational culture relevant to the technology / innovation proposed · Detailed references to support your approach (at least 15) · Word Count Number You may wish to consider the Heilmeier Questions covered in Lectures to assist your thinking Report length: The report will be at least 2000 words in length (excluding images, tables, graphs and captions thereof) with a maximum of 3000 words. 1OENG1115 Semester 2, 2019 Assessment Rubric: Criterion Fail (NN) Pass (PA) Credit (CR) Distinction (DI) High Distinction (HD) Insight (20%) No or limited interpretation, analysis or scholarly input Minimal interpretation, analysis, and depth of thinking than what has been presented in lectures Some interpretation, analysis and depth of thinking over and above lecture materials and readings Significant interpretation, analysis and depth of thinking. Useful conclusions and approaches Exceeds expectations in terms of interpretation, analysis and depth of thinking, novel and insightful conclusions and approaches Content (40%) Nil or minimal attainment of requirement, off topic Meets minimal requirements for content, on topic but gaps, basic input of information Meets requirements for content, some original content Meets requirements for content, significant original contributions Exceed requirements, significant original content throughout Structure (10%) Nil or disorganised structure Structure is sufficient to express content, ideas are often present in a disorganised manner Content is generally organised logically; some elements need attention Structure is sound and supports logical exposition Outstand presentation of materials that supports all requirements Evidence & Referencing (20%) Little or no evidence to support content, copied materials with no citations Minimal referencing and support provided, inconsistent citation style Most points are supported by evidence with citation generally appropriate and consistent Excellent integration of evidence into the work, often primary sources used, citations and referencing appropriate and consistent Outstanding integration of significant research efforts to support arguments. Primary sources used appropriately and consistently Mechanics (10%) Layout and logic is confusing, language is poor, spelling and grammar mistakes Layout and logic is adequate some issues with grammar and spelling Overall presentation of report is easy to digest and language appropriate Very good presentation of content, easy and interesting to read and digest Excellent presentation of content, interesting and insightful, easy to digest and read

oeng1115assessmenttwo2019-2-diilbdda.docx

Amar · Accepted Answer

1
Running Header: Assessment 2 – Low Sulphur Diesel - Spirit of Tasmania
2
Assessment 2 – Low Sulphur Diesel - Spirit of Tasmania
Assessment 2 – Low Sulphur Diesel - Spirit of Tasmania
Table of Contents
Introduction	3
Technology & Innovation Overview	4
Business Case & Risk Assessment	7
Strategy & Process: Implementation, Stakeholders & Organisational Culture	10
Conclusion	11
References	12
Introduction
The Regulation 14.1.3 concerning Annex VI of MARPOL essentially stipulates in that the content of sulphur with respect to any of the fuel oil that is used within board ships should never exceed 0.50 per cent m / m start from 1st of January 2020 excepting the ships which use compliance mechanisms which are of equivalent extent (ICS, 2018; Mestl et al., 2013; Lindstad & Eskeland, 2016). These equivalent mechanisms for compliance as permitted as per Annex VI / Regulation 4 includes the exhaust gas cleaning system (“ECGS”) or LNG which is essentially beyond scope of the guidance from International Chamber for Shipping (“ICS”). ECGS shall permit higher content of sulphur fuels, that is, over 0.50 per cent m / m in being burnt, and these excess levels of sulphur shall be scrubbed out with respect to uptake exhaust gases (ICS, 2018; Mestl et al., 2013; Lindstad & Eskeland, 2016). For purposes of assisting with the global level implementation concerning this global level sulphur cap as well as the overall maintenance concerning a field to be of level playing, International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) of United Nations has in addition approved the prohibition with respect to the carriage concerning fuel oil that is non-compliant. In consistence with the Regulation 4 concerning Annex VI of MARPOL, overall prohibition concerning the carriage pertaining to the fuel oil that is non-compliant shall not be applicable for the ships that are fitted by equivalent forms of compliance (ICS, 2018; Lindstad et al., 2017; Cullinane & Bergqvist, 2014; Olaniyi, 2017). 
In this context, the project identified concerns the Spirit of Tasmania ship. The same entails Spirit I and Spirit II (Spirit of Tasmania, 2019). These new regulations are applicable to Spirit of Tasmania and this proposed project aims in developing suitable solution for making the ship become compliant with respect to Annex VI of MARPOL which essentially stipulates in that the content of sulphur with respect to any of the fuel oil that is used within board ships should never exceed 0.50 per cent m / m start from 1st of January 2020.  This Spirit of Tasmania was originally named as the Superfast IV for Spirit I, and Superfast III for Spirit II (Spirit of Tasmania, 2019). The engine of Spirit of Tasmania can be characterized as follows – [1] two rudders that are electric powered hydraulic power and semi-balanced, [2] the speed of engine is 510 revolutions for each minute, and [3] the engines is under the 100 per cent load with respect to each of the crossing over the double crossings (Spirit of Tasmania, 2019).  In the sea, this ship generates power by way of two different shaft generators that are attached with the main engines that operates with 1,200 revolutions for each minute, and at the port, this ship generates power by way of three different diesel generators. The ship uses to an approximate extent 1,500 kilowatts by way of electrical generation for running the various electrical equipment (Spirit of Tasmania, 2019). This ship uses residual form of diesel fuel, to an approximate extent of 7,000 litres each hour. The overall fuel capacity is equivalent to ~1,222,000 litres (Spirit of Tasmania, 2019).
Technology & Innovation Overview
The technology proposed for Spirit of Tasmania for complying with the lower sulphur content is the scrubber technology. Scrubbers can either be wet or else dry (Panasiuk et al., 2014; Tran, 2017; Makkonen & Inkinen, 2018; Ahlgren et al., 2018). A wet scrubber passes exhaust gases through the liquid media for the purposes of removing the compounds of sulphur from that of gas in the manner of reacting chemically with the parts relating to wash liquid. Widely common form of liquids refers to the untreated forms of sea water, or else fresh water that are chemically treated (Panasiuk et al., 2014; Tran, 2017; Makkonen & Inkinen, 2018; Ahlgren et al., 2018). The sea water-based scrubbers shall often be open loop form, wherein the water shall be sourced as well as discharged from beyond the overall system as well as that water shall flow solely once over the unit. With respect to the closed loop form of scrubber, treatment water shall be cleaned as well as recycled back towards the scrubber over the continuous form of closed loop (Panasiuk et al., 2014; Tran, 2017; Makkonen & Inkinen, 2018; Ahlgren et al., 2018). With respect to the closed loop form of system the particulate matter as well as water treated for maintaining the pH levels as well as later on make the same to be suitable with respect to reuse concerning the scrubber. In essence, usage of the scrubbers have significant levels of potential with respect to substantial levels of environmental as well as social benefits in the manner could reduce the emissions of sulphur by way of at the least 95 per cent as well as particulate matter at the least 60 per cent (Panasiuk et al., 2014; Tran, 2017; Makkonen & Inkinen, 2018; Ahlgren et al., 2018). Further, scrubbers can in addition reduce overall emissions concerning NOx, even though there are none of the consensus in terms of how much. Even though significant levels of drop with respect to the non-GHG affiliated emissions, there are widespread usage concerning ship scrubbers could benefit the populations like for example by way of avoiding certain diseases as well as the overall environment like for example by way of avoiding the acid rain (Panasiuk et al., 2014; Tran, 2017; Makkonen & Inkinen, 2018; Ahlgren et al., 2018). In other end, scrubbers could in addition aid in reducing the greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions for certain extent. There are, however,

OENG1115, Assessment item 2: Innovation and technology management report (individual assessment) Weighting of final grade: 50% Related course learning outcomes: 3 Due date: 4th October 2019 at 11.55pm...

Answer To: OENG1115, Assessment item 2: Innovation and technology management report (individual assessment)...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment