1. The Individual Report is worth 40%of your final grade. Report (Individual) Due: Week 12 Weighting: 40% Organizational Design module COMPANY CHOSEN. FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT IS COCA-COLA EUROPEAN...

1 answer below »
THE FORTUNE 500 COMPANY THAT I WAS ASSIGNED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT IS COCA-COLA EUROPEAN (https://www.ccep.com/). THE ASSIGNMENT HAS TO BE DONE ABOUT THAT AND ONLY THAT COMPANY. NOT ANY OTHER COCA COLAOR BRANDS.


1. The Individual Report is worth 40%of your final grade. Report (Individual) Due: Week 12 Weighting: 40% Organizational Design module COMPANY CHOSEN. FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT IS COCA-COLA EUROPEAN https://www.ccep.com/ For this semester long project you will choose one of the organizations from the Fortune 500 companies or a local company such as a large departmental store, manufacturing company or a non profit organization such as a hospital or a University and study it all semester to give you an insight into the way real world organizations work. No two students will select the same company. There will be a list of Fortune 500 companies for you to select from on iLearn. Please write your name in the allocated column to reserve the company. You will need to collect the specified information as required in the organisation design module on iLearn and answer questions pertaining to the company selected each week. Each module will require you to consider the ethical, sustainability and human rights dimension of your decision. By the end of the semester by completing each module you will have a clear picture of how organizations operate and how they deal with problems and contingencies and understand the ethical dilemmas of change management. In order to do this you will have to contact the owner or manager of the company for gathering information through face-to-face interviews and through secondary data, such as published sources. You will then summarize your findings and produce a written report. You will gain a rich picture of the way the company operates by doing your research personally. The organization has to be big enough to offer insight into the way organisations work and must employ at least 20 people and have 3 levels in its hierarchy. No extension of time for the Individual Report will be granted. Students who have not submitted the task prior to the deadline will be awarded a mark of 0 for the task, except for cases in which an application for disruption of studies is made and approved. 10% penalty will be applied for every 24-hour delay of submission.This penalty does not apply for cases in which an application for Disruptions to Studies is made and approved. Further details on the Report, including submission, Turnitin requirements, marking standards, referencing requirements and presentation requirements are available on iLearn. This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes: · Evaluate the concepts of organisational theory for critical and ethical analysis of organisational structures and management practice · Examine how the key concepts of business models relate to business financial performance · Identify the relationship between business models and business strategies from a human rights perspective. · Develop understanding and knowledge of the different business models and structures, and apply organisation design concepts to case studies of multinational corporations The Individual Report of 5000 words +/- 10% (The word count includes introduction, body and conclusion, but not references or appendices) is to be submitted in week 12. You are required to analyse the Organisational design structure through the weekly modules and develop and recommend an appropriate structure and 5 strategy to suit its current position. This new business model should enable the firm to implement the novel recommended business strategy. Research – at least 10 academic journal articles (references) are required to support your analysis, strategy, model and the business solutions to the weekly questions. Referencing. Harvard style referencing is required. Formatting requirements: · Page margins should be 2.5 cm (default margin settings) on all four edges. · Times New Roman font type and font size of 12 points should be used A suggested format for this report would include the following: Executive Summary (no more than 1 page) Introduction. Body. This should include the following sections: · Short summary of the Fortune 500 company you have selected · Discussion of the current business model and the history of changes in structure and strategy · Answer each week questions from the Organisational design module · Identify the problem and provide solutions · Identification of major stakeholders · Stakeholder problems objectives and concern, · Positive and negative views of current position · Analysis of alternative solutions (that is, the strategies you propose to use) · Recommended solutions (that is, your business model you propose to use) · Managerial implications. · Ethical, human rights and sustainability view point on decisions made every week. Results • Financial implications • Summary of all the Organisational design modules and your learning’s. Conclusion. · Briefly summarise the essential complexities and challenges faced by the firm you have selected in the future. · Identify the recommended solutions and managerial implications.
Answered Same DayMar 12, 2021BBA 280

Answer To: 1. The Individual Report is worth 40%of your final grade. Report (Individual) Due: Week 12...

Soumi answered on Apr 27 2021
143 Votes
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT
Executive Summary
The current report discusses the aspect of ethical consideration in an organisational context and also the subsequent change management for market alignment with a special reference to Coca Cola European Partners (CCEP). The report starts with an overview of the topic and the introduction, which is followed by the details of the chosen organisation and its early history of change management. The report then provides details of organisational module of 12 weeks and gives comprehensive details, necessary to build idea about the implication of ethical, structure and strategic aspects of CCEP. After the week based discussion, the issues faced by the company, the solutions, the suggestions made, the implication of the suggested change on managers and the financial statement of the company is provided, based on which a comprehensive conclusion is formed.
Table of Contents
Introduction    4
Discussion    4
Short Summary of Coca Cola European Partners (CCEP)    4
History of CCEP’s Current Business Model and its History of Change    4
Answers from Organisational Design Module (12 Weeks)    5
Identifying the Prob
lem at CCEP and Probable Solution to the Problem    9
Identifying the Major Stakeholder of CCEP    10
Stakeholders Problems, Objectives and Concerns at CCEP    11
Positive and Negative Views of CCEP’s Current Position    12
Analyzing the Alternative Solution    for Issue at CCEP    13
Recommended Business Model as Solution at CCEP    13
Managerial Implications at CCEP    14
Result of Ethics, Sustainability and Human Rights in Decision making Process per Week    14
Financial Implications at CCEP    15
Summary of Organisational Design and Learning    15
Conclusion    16
References    17
Introduction
The need to change the internal functionality of business organisations is necessary as the external market changes over time and the change management becomes inevitable. The primary aim of any change management is to earn profit in consistent or increased manner to sustain and thrive in the market, and the profit and growth centric aim, often deviated the actions towards ethical issues, which lead to employee and management issues. In the current report the impact of change management in context of Coca Cola European Partner has been discussed, for refining the functionality of the internals of the organisation and reduce the issue of ethical breaches in case the prevention of the issue is not possible.
Discussion
Short Summary of Coca Cola European Partners (CCEP)
The Coca Cola European Partners was established in 28th May 2016, as Coca Cola Enterprise, Coca Cola Ibrian Partners and Coca Cola Erfrischungsgetranke merged into one (Coca Cola European Partners, 2018). Prior to the merger in 2016, Coca Cola Company opened bottling plants in France, and within a few years expanded within other European countries such as Germany, Spain, Netherlands and Belgium within 1931. Over the years the company grew rapidly, acquiring bottling rights in all major European countries and became a major section of the global company Coca Cola, as it secured its rights of selling its bottles for selling Coca Cola in European territory and also got the right to sell in Norway and in Sweden. Currently, Coca Cola European Partners producing bottles, that is used for selling 8% of the total production of the company and is operating in eight European countries. Under Coca Cola European Partners, there are more than 250 bottling partners and 900 bottling facilities in total, which helps the company to meet the demands of one of the most popular non-alcoholic drink in the world (Coca Cola European Partners, 2018).
History of CCEP’s Current Business Model and its History of Change
Prior to the official formation of CCEP in 2016, the business model used by its merging companies were based on the aspect of bottling production and selling rights for Coca Cola in different parts of Europe. As mentioned by Gillespie et al. (2018), in cases of large scale production and a new operational frame, the focus is generally placed on organisational capacity of production increase, where as in case of developed business organisations the business models used for deriving value tends to place the sustainability of the social aspects and environment among its core priorities. Starting from the acquiring of bottling rights and later bottling facilities in the first as well as second half of 1900s and the securing of bottling rights for higher production and more profit earning was the main motto and the business model was based on profiting and growth potential retention (Coca Cola European Partners, 2018). It is worth the notice in the initial stage CCEP had only been a manufacturer for Coca Cola.
However, based on the current changes in the market trends, CCEP has changed its business model, as it no longer has the need to expand its business at rapid pace; instead, it has focused on retaining its customers and Corporate Social Responsibilities. As a part of the latest business model of CCEP, the focus on environmental and social quality retention, the quality of the product and its impact on resources has been optimised to cater value and retain healthy investment for investors as well as market growth. CCEP with its tendencies of maintaining a high standard of packaging of the drinks, the sponsoring of sports events for taking part in social programs to generate goodwill, which has given the company a lot of stability in the market and the good reputation and social participation, has given CCEP its values (CCEP, 2018). It is noticeable that CCEP has transitioned from its manufacturer phase to a more of scientific business model in recent times.
Answers from Organisational Design Module (12 Weeks)
Week 1
Coca Cola European Partners or CCEP is the chosen organisation, which was officially formed in 2016 and prior to its merger it has grown through consistent acquisition of bottling facilities in Europe. The organisation manufactures and recycles Coca Cola bottles and it creates value by focusing on quality retention and environmental preservation. The company aims to reduce carbon footprint problem, littering issues and tends to provide superior quality assurance to customers as a part of its organisational mission. The environmental aspect of CCEP is aimed for attracting customers and can opt for use of solar energy for production and anti-littering campaign as well as awareness programs on littering issues. The company however, use its profit percentage and sells figures as its parameters for setting standards and goals.
Week 2
CCEP has a group of investors, shareholders, internal staffs and the customers, posing as their major stakeholders, where the upper level of internal stakeholders aim at organisational growth and profiting, whereas the lower level internal staffs strive for job security and ease of work, which given the tendency of organisational change creates issues. In addition, the customers, who prefer sustainable business from CCEP, also contradict to their core focus on profiting only and negligence of environmental aspects. CCEP has a very formal and corporate leadership, where the CEO, Damian Gammell is within the board of directors of the company, where Sol Daurella is the chairperson and Nik Jhangiani is the CFO (Coca Cola European Partners, 2018). CCEP has divisional managers and the managers control the production quality and capacity, which creates competitive advantage, also owing to Coca Cola for its popularity. The organisation does have a set code of conduct, which however, is not properly optimised, making the managers often act unethically and hints at organisational refinement.
Week 3
CCEP produces bottles made out of plastic and glass as well as tin cans for Coca Cola drinks and is the major product line and as for service, the company also dedicated to recycling bottles for reuse as a part of its environmental safeguarding endeavours (Coca Cola European Partners, 2018). Considering the public awareness about environmental degradation, CCEP has to deal with the product based littering and carbon emission issues. CCEP is formed of three different companies, which had diverse workplace cultures, leading to a complex business model formation. The company has focused on growth of production and the recent need of environment friendly actions along with profitability leads to an uncertain future. The reason of the merger between the three companies had been based on the resource dependence theory, as it was envisioned that higher capacity and collective use of resources would drive production cost down and higher profit earning and CCEP is doing fine as the sales have increased and profit margins soared.
Week 4
CCEP, in terms of its divisions can be placed in moderate category, as the job distinctions include designing, production, and recycling, packaging and labelling departments. The organisation has retained its bottle designs unique, carrying the heritage of the historical brand Coca Cola and has also been very keen on higher production and less profit earning from per unit, acting as its core competences, which rivals in market would find very difficult to imitate. Although merged the scientific business model adaptation makes the different production facilities post-merger work in synchronised manner, Based on the way CCEP functions it is evident that the focus is more on mechanistic approach than organic. Although CCEP performs will, it can also use agent-based business model to reduce its workload and perform better, reduce its internal cost and attain higher capacity and profitability.
Week 5
CCEP has more than 500 production facilities therefore, hiring a huge number of staffs is common and expected. The company, at the time of its merger had an employee strength of 25000, which after the reconstruction has reached 23,500 employees. The organisation harbours a tall organisational structure and has several divisions of work progress, at the top of which stay the shareholders and the board of directors, followed by the executives, managers and then staffs engaged in manual labours. The tall organisational structure does not create problem and rather helps in managing huge taskforce. The CEO has a wider span of control over the organisation, which is not excessive. The de-centralised structure of the company facilities are brought under control by the CEO, who is aided by the CFO and the managers engaged in the management of the staffs, which is seemed to benefitting the organisation, enabling it to perform better.
Week 6
CCEP has a multidivisional structure, where the upper management and board of directors control the functioning of three major sections, namely the three distinct sections of the pre-merger companies. Each section is regulated by upper level managers and all three organisational manager report directly to the CEO and CFO. The managers have lower level managers, for production, packaging and research and development as well as financial aspect management departments. The lower level managers directly operate over the staffs, while the management of the suppliers and marketing aspects are managed by the management. The company uses a multitude of production facilities distributed across Europe through a centralised management system; therefore, it has adhered to the structure, the advantage of which is the synchronisation between the production facility and the disadvantage of having complex managerial layout. CCEP, despite developing an effective organisational structure is facing the issue of managing its excess managerial staffs, resulting from its inception through a three-sided merger...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here