The following questions in Part A and Part B form the basis of your critical evaluation of each research study. Please provide answers to all questions for each study.Part AIdentify the strengths and weaknesses by critically evaluating the two research studies that Leah found during her CINAHL search (Rogerson, Soltani & Copeland., 2016; Share et al., 2015).1. Authorshipa. Make a judgement regarding the authors’ expertise, qualifications and affiliations.b. Are there grounds for conflict of interest related to the authors of the paper and the study findings?Page 2 of 32. Research Aimsa. What were the research question, aims or hypothesis (if stated)?b. Explain how the authors justified the need for the study?3. Designa. Examine the research methodology and methods used in the study?b. Justify why the methodology and methods were appropriate to meet the aims of thestudy?c. Who were the participants in the research study?4. Findingsa. Discuss how the findings/results/conclusion answers the stated research question,aim or hypothesis?Part B1. Discuss how Leah's personal circumstances may create a barrier for the application ofevidence.2. Discuss how closely the research aligns with the PICO question.
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here