The first case study will focus on ethics in healthcare. For this paper, the student will identify an ethical issue in healthcare (preferably an issue that has occurred in the past 12 months) and prepare a case study that will focus on the following areas:
- What was the ethical issue
- Who does this affect and how
- Why was this particular decision made
- What were some alternatives to the decision
This case study will be prepared in APA format, including double spacing and references. The grading rubric is listed below and should be referenced when conducting your research and preparing your paper. Students are encouraged to present their potential topics prior to starting their research. please read the questions carefully and answer accordingly. please check the ruberic to avoid any errors in this work. the 2 pages excludes the cover page
Grid View List View Ethical issue Affected Parties Reasons for decision Alte actions Exemplary 4(16.66666%) Ethical issue is fully described, identified and explained 4 (16.66666%) Directly- and indirectly-affected parties are identified and described, including groups, classes, populations 4 (16.66666%) All factors impacting decision are identified and described, including relevant political, financial, and individual causes 4 (16.66666%) Other decision choices are identified and their potential benefits and consequences are described 4 (16.66666%) Identifies issue and clearly presents case. Demonstrates full understanding of ethical problem. Develops conclusion based on facts of case and well balanced ethical standards 4 (16.66666%) Few Or No errors in grammar, syntax, word choice or usage Competent 3 (12.50%) Ethical issue is described is identified, but not fully explained 3 (12.50%) Directly or ind are identified a > both. Includes groups, classes, or populations 3 (12.50%) 3 (12.50%) Other de n choices are identified. Potential benefits or consequences are described, but not both x 3 (12.50%) Identifies issue, demonstrates understanding of problem, but does. not develop conclusion 3 (12.50%) Some grammar or usage errors but meaning Is generally well conveyed Satisfactory 2(8.33333%) Ethical issue is minimally described and concerns are referenced without explanation populations identified 2 (8.33333%) Factors impacting decision are minimally identified. No political. financial, or individual causes included 2 (3.33333%) | Other decision choices identifie no potential benefits or cons | discussed | 2(8.33333%) | Identifies issue but does demonstrate understancing or | | develop conclusion 2 (8.33333%) | | Some grammar or usage (rors but meaning is somewhat dist ernible ("666 Ethic. sare identified or i based he “tSofthecase. 1 (4.16666%) Factors impacting decision are not identified 1 (a16686%) Other decision choices are not dentified 174. o600%) esent ina clear and «© nensive manner. Dees nat present conclusion.