The final capstone project is a series of written research-based assignments completed throughout this course that culminate in a final evidenced-based proposal paper and presentation. Students are...

The final capstone project is a series of written research-based assignments completed throughout this course that culminate in a final evidenced-based proposal paper and presentation. Students are encouraged to share their completed proposals with a health care organization that could benefit from the proposal. For this second assignment, you will analyze current research to support your evidence-based intervention project.

Use the "Reviewing the Literature" worksheet to complete this two-part assignment. For Part 1, the Literature Evaluation Table, you will locate and organize information from 10-12 peer-reviewed articles for your literature review. In Part 2, the Literature Analysis, you will analyze the articles you selected and write a review of the literature. Use the information from your Literature Evaluation Table to ensure the inclusion of key information in your narrative.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Resource Reviewing the Literature Student Name: Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words): PICO Question: Part 1: Literature Evaluation Table Locate a minimum of 10-12 peer-reviewed articles that support your proposed topic. Eight of the 10-12 peer-reviewed articles must be research-based (i.e., a study which is qualitative, quantitative, descriptive, or longitudinal). Begin your search for literature by utilizing the databases located in the GCU Library. Contact your instructor, the librarian, or library staff for additional researching tips and keyword suggestions. Preview each of the articles chosen by reading the article abstracts and summaries. Article abstracts and summaries provide a concise description of the topic, research outcomes, and significance of findings. Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 APA-Formatted Article Citation With Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICO Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher Criteria Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 APA-Formatted Article Citation With Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICO Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher Criteria Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 APA-Formatted Article Citation With Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICO Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher Criteria Article 10 Article 11 Article 12 APA-Formatted Article Citation With Permalink How Does the Article Relate to the PICO Question? Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?) Purpose Statement Research Question Outcome Setting (Where did the study take place?) Sample Method Key Findings of the Study Recommendations of the Researcher Part 2: Analysis of Literature In 750-1,000 words, write a review of the literature. This section should comprehensively summarize previous research related to your topic and demonstrate support for your PICO question. Remember, you are building an argument to for your proposed evidence-based project; this is not simply an article review. Appraise each article and answer the following questions for each (one to two sentences is sufficient to answer each question): 0. Summarize the purpose of the article or research. 0. Describe how the article or research relates to the health care problem or issue you selected. 0. Explain how the evidence in the article or research supports your proposed intervention. © 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. 2 Running head: Problem, purpose 2 Problem, Purpose, And Questions: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Problem, Purpose, And Questions: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Breyauna L. Davis    College of Nursing and Health Care Professions, Grand Canyon University    HLT 490V – Professional Capstone Project Prof. Ashley Hartman February 5, 2023  1. A healthcare issue that is being discussed in this case study is the problem of depression prevalent among patients. The problem of depression, stress, and anxiety are common in the discipline of healthcare studies. Millions of people across the world suffer from stress, anxiety, and depression problems every year (Yeon et al., 2021). 2. The target population in this study includes the group of people living in Korea who underwent forest-associated anti-stress and anti-depression studies. The population is getting affected tremendously due to the impact of stress, depression, and anxiety in their life. The therapy performed on these patients includes the exposure of the patients to a quiet forest environment where there is no noise and no pollution. Exposure to a quiet serene environment in a forest has a calming effect on the life of people who suffer from depression and must be kept away from the noisy life in the city suburbs. Prolonged exposure to incidences of stress, depression and anxiety increases the chances of the occurrence of suicide. Therefore, appropriate therapy is prescribed to the patients. As the experimental survey revealed there are tremendous positive effects of undergoing forest inhabitation therapy with a reduction in the levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. The results are evident in the group of participant patients undergoing this therapy as they perform normal walks and breathing in the forest region in the morning in comparison to the participants who did not undergo this therapy. Thus, forest living, or inhabitation therapy is recommended to most clients who suffer from stress, anxiety, and depression (Yeon et al., 2021). The depression scale index was also used for identifying and analyzing the level and intensity of stress, depression, and anxiety present in the mindset of the patient participants. The patient outcome includes the statistical study among the group of participants; intervention includes the therapy sessions organized in the serene environment of forests. The comparison analysis includes the group of participants with a control group of participants who did not undergo forest-associated and behavioral therapy sessions by the counselors. The outcome was that the treated group of patients showed a significant improvement in their behavior and exhibited lesser incidences of stress, anxiety, and depression (Yeon et al., 2021). The work of Bielinis et al. (2019), explained that there is a significant effect of the green cover silent forest therapy on the mental life of the patients undergoing therapy for stress, depression and anxiety. In another study conducted by the group of Jun et al. (2019), green cover forest placement therapy was performed on the participants for obtaining a calm composing mental behavior without any significant hurdles. In another study conducted in the USA, there is an analysis of the levels of depression among people in the age group of 65 years. The older age group population is specifically prone to the incidence of depression and anxiety. The PICO outcome in this study includes the clinical intervention and examination of the elderly patients prone to depression and anxiety in comparison to the normal control group. The outcome measure is that elderly people are more prone to the occurrence of stress, anxiety, and depression. The questions which can be asked are “Is there an effect of undergoing a psychological behavioral therapy on the mental health of elderly people? (Anderson, 2021)” 3. The questions which need to be asked among the participants involved in this statistical survey include: 1. Whether the forest associated and forest visit sessions with behavioral therapy are helpful for the patients in the long run-in comparison to a significant outcome in the short run sessions? 2. Whether the behavioral therapy and the forest-associated sessions can help improve the relationship among the family members living in different families? References Anderson, C. (2021). Part of the Psychiatric and Mental Health Commons Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Anderson, Cantrell. https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=dnp_capstone Bielinis, E., Jaroszewska, A., Łukowski, A., & Takayama, N. (2019). The Effects of a Forest Therapy Programme on Mental Hospital Patients with Affective and Psychotic Disorders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010118 Jun, A. Y., Lee, K.-S., & Lee, S.-M. (2019). Effects of the forest experience intervention program on depression, cognitive function, and quality of life in the elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 36(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2019.36.3.73 Yeon, P.-S., Jeon, J.-Y., Jung, M.-S., Min, G.-M., Kim, G.-Y., Han, K.-M., Shin, M.-J., Jo, S.-H., Kim, J.-G., & Shin, W.-S. (2021). Effect of Forest Therapy on Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12685. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312685. Reviewing the Literature - Rubric Total 110 points Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent PICO Questions PICO Questions 0 points The PICO question for the proposed topic is omitted. 2.15 points NA 2.47 points NA 2.8 points NA 3.3 points The PICO question for the proposed topic is stated. Analysis of Literature: Summary of Purpose Analysis of Literature: Summary of Purpose 0 points The analysis of the literature is incomplete. 10.73 points The appraisal of each article is inaccurate or contains omissions. The overall summary analysis presented does not demonstrate support for the PICO question. 12.38 points Each article is appraised, and the purpose is generally summarized. Some aspects are vague. The overall summary analysis of the research demonstrates general support for the PICO question. More information or support is needed. 14.03 points Each article is appraised, and the purpose is discussed. The summary is informative and concise for each article. The overall summary analysis of the research demonstrates support for the PICO question. Some detail is needed for support or accuracy. 16.5 points Each article is clearly appraised, and the purpose is detailed and concise. The summary is informative and concise for each article. The overall summary analysis of the research demonstrates compelling support for the PICO question. Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment. 0 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. 3.58 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. 4.13 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 4.68 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 5.5 points All format elements are correct. Analysis of Literature: Explanation of How Research Evidence Supports Proposed Intervention Analysis of Literature: Explanation of How Research Evidence Supports Proposed Intervention 0 points An explanation for how the evidence in the article or the research supports the proposed intervention is not presented. The evidence does not support the proposed intervention 14.3 points The explanation for how the evidence in the article or the research supports the proposed intervention is incomplete. The evidence only partially supports the proposed intervention. 16.5 points A summary for how the evidence in the article or the research supports the proposed intervention is presented. The evidence generally supports the proposed intervention. 18.7 points An explanation for how the evidence in the article or the research supports the proposed intervention is presented. The evidence supports the proposed intervention. 22 points A well-supported explanation for how the evidence in the article or the research supports the proposed intervention is presented. The evidence demonstrates strong support for the proposed intervention. Summary of Clinical Issue Summary of Clinical Issue 0 points Summary of clinical issue is omitted. 1.43 points The clinical issue is only partially discussed. 1.65 points The clinical issue is generally outlined. More information or support is needed. 1.87 points The clinical issue is described. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. 2.2 points The clinical issue is succinct and thoroughly described. Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use. 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. 3.58 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. 4.13 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. 4.68 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. 5.5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Literature Evaluation Table Literature Evaluation Table 0 points The table is incomplete or fails to meet the assignment criteria overall. 10.73 points Fewer than 10 articles in support of the proposed topic are presented. Fewer than six articles are peer reviewed or research based. The criteria for this assignment are only partially met. 12.38 points Ten to 12 articles in support of the proposed topic are presented. One or two articles are not peer reviewed. Only six or seven articles are research based. The criteria are generally met for each article. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. 14.03 points Ten to 12 peer-reviewed articles in support of the proposed topic are presented. At least eight of the articles are research based. The criteria are