PDF File Assessment Task 2: Critique of Entrepreneurial Theories, Cases and Processes (30%) Criteria HD (High Distinction) 80-100% D (Distinction) 70-79% C (Credit) 60-69% P (Pass) 50-59% F (Fail)...

The extract of Assignment should be professional. Appendix is not necessary.


PDF File Assessment Task 2: Critique of Entrepreneurial Theories, Cases and Processes (30%) Criteria HD (High Distinction) 80-100% D (Distinction) 70-79% C (Credit) 60-69% P (Pass) 50-59% F (Fail) less than 50% Research and assess the facets of entrepreneurial decision-making and agency for new venture creation in response to specific issues and opportunities A highly detailed and articulate description of the start-up company or entrepreneurial venture that provides a strong and coherent assessment of the decisions / steps taken by key actors and why. The writing is clear and flows well, and sentence, paragraph and report structure are well-formed. Academic language is used appropriately. A wide range of relevant academic and non-academic literature supports the analysis. All sources are referenced appropriately using APA referencing. A detailed and clear description of the start-up company or entrepreneurial venture that provides a clear and coherent analysis of the decisions / steps taken by key actors and why. The writing is clear and sentence, paragraph and report structure are largely well-formed. Academic language is used appropriately. A range of relevant academic and non- academic literature support the analysis. All sources are referenced appropriately using APA referencing. A reasonably clear description of the start-up company or entrepreneurial venture that provides a coherent overview of the decisions / steps taken by key actors and why. The writing is reasonably clear but there is room for improvement in sentence, paragraph and report structure. The report references academic and non- academic literature which is mostly relevant. Referencing is adequate in a general sense, with perhaps a very small number of exceptions. The description of the start- up company or entrepreneurial venture is basic and lacks detail in some sections. The report gives minimal consideration to the decisions / steps taken by key actors and why. The writing is satisfactory, but there are some limitations in sentence, paragraph and report structure. The report have references mainly non-academic literature, and limitations exist in the quantity and quality of references used. Most referencing is adequate with a number of inadequate references or an absence of appropriate references. An inadequate description of the start-up company or entrepreneurial venture. Information about the decisions and steps taken by key actors is absent or incoherent, and no analysis is carried out. The writing does not meet the minimum academic standard. An insufficient number of relevant references has been used. The referencing does not adhere to the specified referencing system and multiple errors and inconsistencies are evident. Draw upon entrepreneurship concepts, theories and principles to analyse the role of entrepreneurial action in a diverse range of contexts Numerous interesting and well-developed insights are put forward through linking critical concepts and theories to the case study. The report goes into substantial depth in terms of unpacking the array of processes and challenges that have played out in the context/s under investigation. Key insights are presented with some strong links made to relevant concepts and theories. The report goes into some depth in terms of the various processes and challenges within the context/s under investigation. At times information in the report is linked to concepts and theories, however there are missed opportunities where these connections could be enhanced to add greater depth to the analysis. The report outlines some of the processes and challenges within the context/s under investigation, with some aspects given inadequate consideration. By and large minimal links are made to concepts and theories, or where these are made they are not well developed. The report provides a basic outline of processes and challenges, with insights kept to a broad or generalised level. Links between concepts and theories are not evident and therefore the theoretical implications are not adequately engaged with. There is no consideration of contextual processes, or any attempt to discuss these is simplistic and lacks the level of insight expected in this assessment task. Critically analyse real- world entrepreneurship issues and the impacts of innovation and entrepreneurship in society Clearly identifies and explores in detail real-world issues and the role of entrepreneurship, including a consideration of all of the following: the broader operating environment, macro economic and societal trends. There are a number of strong linkages between the identified factors and the case study. Clearly identifies and explores real-world factors and the role of entrepreneurship including a consideration of at least two of the following: the broader operating environment, macro economic and societal trends. There are a number of relevant linkages between the identified factors and the case study. Identifies and explores some of the real-world factors and the role of entrepreneurship, expanding on at least one of the following: broader operating environment, macro economic and societal trends. There are some reasonable linkages made between the identified factors and the case study. Identifies very briefly or in vague terms a real-world factor and its ties to entrepreneurial activity. There is some attempt at linking the identified factor/s and the case study however these links are not entirely clear. Does not adequately identify and explore the real-world factors in this case. Incorrect linkages or no linkages are made between any factors raised and the case study. Feedback TOTAL: / 30