The dissenting opinion in Florida v. Jimeno stated, “Because an individual’s expectation of privacy in a container is distinct from, and far greater than, his expectation of privacy in the interior of...

The dissenting opinion in Florida v. Jimeno stated, “Because an individual’s expectation of privacy in a container is distinct from, and far greater than, his expectation of privacy in the interior of his car, it follows that an individual’s consent to a search of the interior of his car cannot necessarily be understood as extending to containers in the car.” 500 U.S. at 254. Discuss.