The Court indicated that protection for the student was available by virtue of the procedural safeguards and the fact that parents do “not lack ardor in seeking to ensure that handicapped students...

The Court indicated that protection for the student was available by virtue of the procedural safeguards and the fact that parents do “not lack ardor in seeking to ensure that handicapped students receive all the benefits [of the Act].” This assumes that all parents are aware of their rights and have the means to pursue them. How valid is that assumption?