The Charvaka philosophers claimed that generalizations are always unreliable because they always go beyond what you observe. How does a generalization go beyond what you observe? Why is a generalization “unreliable” if it goes beyond what you observe? Do you think there is any way of making sure your own generalizations are not “unreliable” in this way?
Already registered? Login
Not Account? Sign up
Enter your email address to reset your password
Back to Login? Click here