Textbook: Chapter 5, 6 Lesson Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook) Instructions This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part...

1 answer below »


  • Textbook: Chapter 5, 6

  • Lesson

  • Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook)



Instructions

This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text. At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps.


First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.


Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.


Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:



  • What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.

  • What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.


Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.


Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.



Writing Requirements (APA format)



  • Length: 3-4pages (not including title page or references page)

  • 1-inch margins

  • Double spaced

  • 12-point Times New Roman font

  • Title page

  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook)



Grading

This activity will be graded based on the rubric provided.

Answered Same DayJul 22, 2021

Answer To: Textbook: Chapter 5, 6 Lesson Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook)...

Somudranil answered on Jul 24 2021
159 Votes
Running Head: Euthanasia and Ethics        1
Euthanasia and Ethics        6
EUTHANASIA AND ETHICS
Table of Contents
Part 1    3
Part 2    5
References    6
Part 1
Euthanasia or M
ercy Killing has always been a subject of debate where various researchers have argued in context of its moral side. The question about whether it is right to assist someone in his own death can be subjective. As opined by Keown (2018) even if the Christian indoctrination of order specifies that it is human reason that is supposedly instrumental with regards to the individuals. They have no power over their bodies. It can however be seen as a kind of unnatural act that individual commits with assistance in order to escape a natural and more painful death. Thereby it appears to be morally wrong.
An ethical egoist will obviously stand in favour of the patient and would say that whenever a person does or does not want to put an end to life by undertaking euthanasia. Their desire appears to be effectively motivated in consideration of the need pertaining to the self-benefit. This is what according to the ethical egoist will be regarded as an ethical action. Egoism might pave the situation for a death of an individual. However, it is the individual who might harbor the feeling that it is the resultant outcome of their personal interest. They also might derive benefit from it so considering everything it is will be wise to die. As observed by Emanuel et al., (2016) they undergo a terrible agonizing state of traumatic experience involving a lot of pain. Therefore, they might lose their bodily functions and can be subjected to the situation where they face a residual of...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here