Task requirements: This assessment builds on the feedback you received for the case study abstract. It is designed to provide you with an opportunity to justify the clinical priorities you decided on...

Task requirements: This assessment builds on the feedback you received for the case study abstract. It is designed to provide you with an opportunity to justify the clinical priorities you decided on for your patient.
You should use a maximum of 9 narrated PowerPoint slides. Instructions for creating and submitting your presentation online are available on Blackboard. The structure of your case study presentation should clearly address the following points:
1. Provide a brief overview of your patient that includes the reason for hospitalisation, and relevant assessment data. (2 slides)
2. Analyse the assessment data, demonstrating knowledge of the relevant pathophysiology. You should apply the ‘Process the Information’ component of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (CRC). (1 – 2 slide)
3. Identify the clinical priorities (minimum of 2 and maximum of 4). Justify your decision with relevant literature, and by linking back to the pathophysiology of the patient’s condition. Orally state which clinical priority will be the focus of assessment item 3. (4 slides maximum)
4. Identify 3 sources of evidenced-based literature (EBL) no more than 7 years old that you think will be relevant to Assessment 3. Assessment 3 focuses on the interventions for the identified clinical priority. State the reason you chose the EBL and why it supports or does not support the interventions(s) used. (1 slide)
5. Add a title slide, and a references slide presented in APA style (not counted in maximum number).Task requirements: Watch the narrated presentation based on the text book case study from chapter 10, Mrs Grace Simpson, or watch a narrated presentation from your tutorial group.
Comment on the match between the clinical priorities and the assessment data described in the narrated PowerPoint presentation (either Mrs Simpson or a fellow students), using evidence based literature to support your discussion.
For example, you could address one / some of the following points: is the abnormal assessment data addressed by the identified clinical priorities; are all the clinical priorities appropriate for the patient; is there other assessment data that could have been collected for the patient?
Demonstrate your clinical reasoning skills by presenting specific and well justified discussion on this aspect of the patient’s care