Criteria
|
Excellent
|
Very good
|
Good
|
Satisfactory
|
Poor
|
Score
|
Providing appropriatefeedbackon literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses based on theanalysisof the student work sample
|
Provides clear, relevant, specific feedback on literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses in the student work sample.
|
Most of the feedback on literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses in the student work sample is clear, relevant, specific.
|
Some of the feedback on literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses in the student work sample is clear, relevant, specific.
|
General feedback on literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses in the student work sample
|
Inadequate feedback on literacy and numeracy strengths and weaknesses in the work sample
|
10
|
Using/adapting the template provided, designs a detailed description of literacy and numeracy-embeddedunit of work, which clearly indicates how literacy, numeracy, subject content and assessment are integrated.
|
Designs an exceptionally well-presented and well developed unit of work which clearly indicates how literacy, numeracy, subject content and assessment are integrated
|
Designs a very well-presented and well developed unit of work which clearly indicates how literacy, numeracy, subject content and assessment are integrated
|
Designs a well-presented and reasonably well developed unit of work which indicates how literacy, numeracy, subject content and assessment are integrated
|
Designs aunit of workthat is satisfactory but requires further development
|
Inadequate description of unit of work
|
10
|
Explicitly details the specific literacy and numeracy demands in the lessons.
|
Presents very specific and highly relevant literacy and numeracy demands in all four lessons
|
Presents specific and relevant literacy and numeracy demands in most lessons
|
Presents relevant literacy and numeracy demands in most lessons
|
Presents relevant literacy and numeracy demands in some lessons
|
Inadequate literacy and numeracy demands
|
8
|
Designs meaningful teaching and learning activities that handle the literacy and numeracy demands identified in the lessons.
|
Details a variety of well-designed and engaging literacy and numeracy teaching activities in all four lessons
|
Details a variety of well-designed and engaging literacy and numeracy teaching activities in most lessons
|
Details at least two appropriate literacy and numeracy teaching activities in each lesson
|
Details at least one appropriate literacy and one appropriate numeracy learning activity in each lesson
|
Lacks appropriate literacy and numeracy learning activities
|
6
|
Provides evidence of using the unit material.
|
All the 10 core readings from the Study Schedule plus other relevant readings are effectively used in the essay.
|
Effectively uses more than 6 core readings in the Study Schedule.
|
Effectively uses more than 4 core readings in the Study Schedule.
|
Effectively uses the topic notes for the 8 topics and at least one core literacy and one core numeracy reading in the Study Schedule.
|
Shows limited use of the topic notes and core readings in the Study Schedule.
|
5
|
Uses APA referencing in-text and on the reference list.
|
Demonstrates accurate use of APA referencing
|
Uses APA referencing with occasional minor errors
|
Uses APA referencing with several minor errors
|
Uses APA referencing with some minor omissions and inaccuracies
|
Inadequate referencing with major omissions and inaccuracies
|
3
|
Displays professional presentation and literacy proficiency at all levels including double spacing, text/paragraph structure, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
|
Submits an extremely well presented and very well structured assignment.
Sophisticated professional writing, free from error
|
Delivers an effectively presented and very well structured assignment.
Very good standard of professional writing
|
Delivers a well-presented and well-structured assignment.
Good standard of professional writing
|
Delivers an assignment that is satisfactory in presentation and structure.
Errors in writing without interfering with understanding
|
Delivers a poorly presented and poorly structured assignment.
Significant number of errors in writing and/or lack of careful editing
|
4
|
Reflections on the unit of work that supports subject area learning through literacy and numeracy-embedded teaching.
|
Clearly explains how the unit of work has achieved the learning outcomes/content descriptions through integrating subject, literacy, numeracy and assessment by citing relevant literature and examples from the lessons
Excellent critique of the use of the framework(s) or model(s) in handling literacy and numeracy demands and assessment
|
Clearly shows how the unit of work has achieved the learning outcomes/content descriptions through integrating subject, literacy, numeracy and assessment by citing relevant literature and examples from the lessons
Sound critique of the use of the frameworks or models in handling literacy and numeracy demands and assessment
|
Shows reasonably well how the unit of work has achieved the learning outcomes/content descriptions through integrating subject, literacy, numeracy and assessment by citing relevant literature and examples from the lessons
Reasonable critique of the use of the frameworks or models in handling literacy and numeracy demands and assessment
|
Makes general reflections on literacy and numeracy-embedded teaching in the unit work
Some relevant critique of the use of the frameworks or models in handling literacy and numeracy demands and assessment
|
Little relevant reflections on literacy and numeracy-embedded teaching
|
4
|