take an article in on Project delivery systems in construction ( Article must be prereived , in between 2016-2020) and summary of article in 700 words.please follow the instructions in attached files.Note: send me the article linkthank you
Assessment 1: Article Summary Due date: Week 3 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 700 words Weighting: 10% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2 Course Learning Outcomes: Graduate Attributes: Assessment 1 Details: This Article summary assesses your knowledge of key content areas of project delivery methods and contract management. For successful completion of the Article Summary, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. Guidelines for writing a summary of an article: · Identify the key ideas of the article. · You need to identify the relevant information that support the key ideas. · You are required to summary the article in your own words without copying phrases and sentences from the article unless they’re direct quotations. · The length of the summary should not exceed more than one third of the length of the original article. The summary should include: · Introduction · Body Paragraphs · Concluding Paragraph Marking Information: The Article Summary will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. Article Summary Rubric Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Article choice (10% Marks) The selected article does not reflect the subject’s main concepts. The selected article is in the field of the subject and reflects one/some of the main concepts suggested by the lecturer. The selected article is in the field of the subject, covers the main concepts suggested by the lecturer but may not be current or scholarly. The selected article is in the field of the subject and covers the concepts suggested by the lecturer and is scholarly and relatively current. The article directly discusses the main concepts suggested by the lecturer and is highly relevant, scholarly and recently published. Written communication skills (20% marks) Writing lacks clarity and coherence. Points have not been paraphrased well. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing is generally clear with some lapses in coherence. Some points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing is clear and coherent. Most points have been paraphrased well. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing shows good clarity and cohesion. Points have been paraphrased well. There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing shows excellent clarity and cohesion. Points have been skilfully paraphrased. There are no or very few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. ( Page | 1 ) ( Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 29/11/2019 ) Content (40% marks) The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are missing, unclear, inaccurate and/or irrelevant. The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are generally evident, but may be vague, incomplete, or have some inaccuracies. The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised accurately in most parts. Some information may be irrelevant or inaccurate. The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised clearly and accurately, providing a good overview of the article with minimal irrelevant or inaccurate information. The article’s main topic(s), aim/ purpose, key points and conclusions are identified and summarised clearly, accurately and precisely, providing an excellent overview of the original article. Summary (20% marks) The summary is not well organised, does not flow logically and is difficult to follow. The summary shows some organisation, but some parts may not flow logically and are difficult to follow. The summary shows organisation and is easy to follow, but occasionally still lacks flow. The summary shows coherent and logical organisation and most points are easy to follow. The summary shows coherent and logical organisation and has clear, well- structured points. Style (10% marks) The article is not referenced. Reporting verbs and connecting words are not used. The article is referenced but contains errors or does not follow Harvard referencing style. Limited reporting verbs and connecting words are used. The article is referenced in Harvard referencing style but may contain some minor errors. Some reporting verbs and connecting words are used. The article is referenced in Harvard referencing style with few errors. Reporting verbs and connecting words are used well to create flow. The article is accurately referenced in Harvard referencing style. Reporting verbs and connecting words are used very well to create flow and cohesion. Assessment Presentation Guidelines The key presentation requirements for assessments are listed below. All written assignments must conform to the following checklist: 1. The assignment is submitted in Microsoft Word format 2. The assignment includes a signed Assessment Cover Sheetas the first page (see Attachment 1 and Attachment 2) 3. The assignment includesa footer on each pageapart from the title page with your name, student number and page number 4. The assignment has 2.54cm margins on all sides 5. The assignment has double spacing throughout 6. The first line of every paragraph is indented by 1.25cm 7. Times New Roman font in size 12 pointis used throughout 8. Text is left aligned (not justified) 9. In-text references and the reference list should follow the Harvard referencing style 10. Reference list entries have a 1.25cm hanging indent Headings Most reports and case studies include headings but not all papers should; therefore, check with your lecturer or tutor to make sure that headings are appropriate for the specific paper you are writing. Headings should be formatted according to the following guidelines: · The firstlevel should be centered and in bold. Each main word should start with a capital letter. First Level Heading · The second levelshould be left-aligned and in bold. Each main word should start with a capital letter. Second Level Heading · The third level should be italicised. Each main word should start with a capital letter. Third Level Heading · Paragraphs should begin on a new line. · Headings may be numbered, i.e. 1, 1.1, 1.2, 2, 2.2 and so on. Assessment word count All assessments specify a word count. An assessment that is within 10% of the specified word count (either more or less) will not be penalised. However, if you submit an assessment that is more than 10% under or over the specified word count, your grade may be penalised. As in-text citations of your sources is an assumed part of academic writing, the assessment word count does include the in-text referencing (i.e. author/date/page number). Quotations are also included in the word count. The title page, table of contents page, reference list or appendices are not included in the word count. It is recommended that you use a computer-generated word count by selecting from the first word of the introduction (or if a report, either the abstract or summary) to the last word of the conclusion (or if a report, the recommendations). Introduction to Harvard Referencing Style Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Academic integrity is based on honesty in all scholarly work. This includes always acknowledging ideas, opinions, theories and information that comes from the work of others in your academic work. If you do not acknowledge the author of ideas, opinions and theories that you present then it appears that you are attempting to present the work of another person as your own, which is known as plagiarism. Plagiarism is a form of academic misconduct and is taken very seriously by the College and may result in a finding of academic misconduct that can incur penalties including loss of marks, a fail grade for an assessment, a fail grade for a unit, or expulsion from the College. Plagiarism can be accidental / unintentional, and this most often occurs when people do not understand what plagiarism is. Deliberate plagiarism is much more serious, and occurs when a person fails to acknowledge sources although they understand the implications of choosing not to do so. For this reason, the College seeks to educate students about plagiarism and to support new students to understand their responsibilities so as to ensure that they do not accidentally or deliberately plagiarise the work of others. For more information on academic integrity and plagiarism, please see the APIC Student Handbook and the APIC Academic Integrity Policy. What is Referencing? Referencing is a method of acknowledging the sources of information that you use in writing your assignments, such as essays and reports, or any other work of scholarship. Whenever you present a statement in your assignment that is not your own original idea, opinion or theory, whether it is presented in your own words (paraphrased) or in the author’s exact words (quoted), you must include a reference to acknowledge your source. Use in-text citations in the body of your writing to briefly refer to a work and acknowledge the source of information. Provide a reference list at the end of your paper with full details of the in-text citations. The information in the reference list should be sufficient for someone else reading your assignment to find the source themselves if they wish. There are conventions for how to present in-text citations and reference list entries and these are described below. You are expected to follow these conventions in all of your written work submitted for assessment at APIC unless you are specifically advised otherwise. Harvard Style of Referencing At APIC students are expected to use the Harvard style for referencing / acknowledging sources. Harvard style is used widely for academic writing and is commonly used in business disciplines. Unlike many other styles, there is no source document for a Harvard style, and this guide was developed from a range of online Harvard style guides, most of which were based on APIC Student Guide to Harvard Referencing Style | 1 Commonwealth of Australia 2002, Style Manual for authors, editors and printers, 6th edn, rev. by Snooks & Co, John Wiley & Sons, Queensland. This guide includes examples and basic explanations for the most common types of citations used by students. More detailed explanations and examples can be found here and here. In-Text Citations: Primary References Primary references are works that you have read yourself, such as journal articles, books, book chapters, websites, government reports and a range of other information sources. To cite primary references follow the conventions below. · Harvard uses author-date style of referencing. When you incorporate information from a source in your text, place the author’s surname and year of publication in parentheses at the end of