can u help
T2 2022 Formative Assessment 1 Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code BN321 Unit Title Advanced Network Design Assessment Type Individual Submission Assessment Title Local Area Network Design and Implementation Purpose of the This assignment is designed to assess students' knowledge and skills related to assessment (with the following learning outcomes: ULO Mapping) a. Analyse the need for advanced networks, standards, and network solutions. Weight 5 % Formative Assignment 1 Total Marks 30 Word limit N/A Due Date Formative Assignment 1 (due date 07 August 2022, 11:59 PM) Submission • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date and a completed Guidelines Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Extension • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Academic • Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of Misconduct the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy- Procedure For further information; please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio July 2022 http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special-considerationdeferment http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure Assignment Description As a Graduate Network Engineer in Australia, you are asked to support the redesigning process of a cost-effective network for a company to meet the new online requirements. As a part of the design task force, you are required to come up with a network design proposal. Consider that the company has six departments as per the names Finance, IT, Marketing, Management, Customer Services, and Reception. The company requires to have seamless communication with all the departments. You may assume that there are not more than 50 hosts in each department for IP addressing design requirements. Formative Assignment 1 The report should include the following contents: 1. Project Scope • The project scope and requirement should have an outline of the project. 2. Project Hardware and Software requirements • Name of the network device with the manufacturer's name, series, model, and ports • Number and type of devices to be used • Type of the media used, e.g., types of cables • Name of the server, PC with specifications such as operating system, RAM, hard disk etc. 3. Approach for the design • Discuss the approach you are taking to designing the network in clear terms. You may discuss IP addressing design requirements. You may use bullet points whenever necessary. • Note that network topology is optional, but you may include it for clarification purposes. [Hint: The use of Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) for different departments could be one of the preferences. However, you may have your approaches with justification/s.] Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio July 2022 Marking criteria Section to be included in Description of the section Marks the report Project Scope Outline of the report 5 Project Hardware and List all network devices, hardware, and software Software Requirements requirements for the network design 5+5=10 & their roles in Establishing the Network Approach for the Design Discuss the approach you are taking to design the 5+5=10 network along with IP addressing design in clear terms. You may use bullet points whenever necessary. Referencing Style Follow IEEE reference style (you may have 3-5 5 credible and relevant references) Total 30 Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Imran Jokhio July 2022 Marking Rubric Grade HD =>80% DI = 70-79% CR=60–69% P=50–59% Fail Mark<50% excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory project scope concise and topics are generally some this is not /5 specific to the relevant and relevant and relevance and relevant to the project soundly analysed. briefly assignment analysed. presented. topic. project demonstrated demonstrated demonstrate demonstrated did not hardware and excellent ability excellent d ability to ability to think demonstrate software to think critically ability to think think critically critically and the ability to requirements and sourced critically but and sourced did not source think critically /5+5=10 reference did not source reference reference and did not material reference material material source appropriately material appropriately appropriately reference appropriately material appropriately approach for an explanation is an explanation an an an explanation the design clear, and the is clear, and explanation is explanation is is not clear, and /5+5=10 logic is the logic is mostly clear, mostly clear, the logic is not appropriate mostly and the logic and the logic is appropriate appropriate is mostly not appropriate appropriate ieee clear styles with clear generally sometimes lacks reference an excellent referencing good clear consistency style source of style referencing referencing with many /5 references. style style errors page 4 of 4 prepared by: dr sanjeeb shrestha moderated by: dr imran jokhio july 2022 excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" project="" scope="" concise="" and="" topics="" are="" generally="" some="" this="" is="" not="" 5="" specific="" to="" the="" relevant="" and="" relevant="" and="" relevance="" and="" relevant="" to="" the="" project="" soundly="" analysed.="" briefly="" assignment="" analysed.="" presented.="" topic.="" project="" demonstrated="" demonstrated="" demonstrate="" demonstrated="" did="" not="" hardware="" and="" excellent="" ability="" excellent="" d="" ability="" to="" ability="" to="" think="" demonstrate="" software="" to="" think="" critically="" ability="" to="" think="" think="" critically="" critically="" and="" the="" ability="" to="" requirements="" and="" sourced="" critically="" but="" and="" sourced="" did="" not="" source="" think="" critically="" 5+5="10" reference="" did="" not="" source="" reference="" reference="" and="" did="" not="" material="" reference="" material="" material="" source="" appropriately="" material="" appropriately="" appropriately="" reference="" appropriately="" material="" appropriately="" approach="" for="" an="" explanation="" is="" an="" explanation="" an="" an="" an="" explanation="" the="" design="" clear,="" and="" the="" is="" clear,="" and="" explanation="" is="" explanation="" is="" is="" not="" clear,="" and="" 5+5="10" logic="" is="" the="" logic="" is="" mostly="" clear,="" mostly="" clear,="" the="" logic="" is="" not="" appropriate="" mostly="" and="" the="" logic="" and="" the="" logic="" is="" appropriate="" appropriate="" is="" mostly="" not="" appropriate="" appropriate="" ieee="" clear="" styles="" with="" clear="" generally="" sometimes="" lacks="" reference="" an="" excellent="" referencing="" good="" clear="" consistency="" style="" source="" of="" style="" referencing="" referencing="" with="" many="" 5="" references.="" style="" style="" errors="" page="" 4="" of="" 4="" prepared="" by:="" dr="" sanjeeb="" shrestha="" moderated="" by:="" dr="" imran="" jokhio="" july="">50% excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory project scope concise and topics are generally some this is not /5 specific to the relevant and relevant and relevance and relevant to the project soundly analysed. briefly assignment analysed. presented. topic. project demonstrated demonstrated demonstrate demonstrated did not hardware and excellent ability excellent d ability to ability to think demonstrate software to think critically ability to think think critically critically and the ability to requirements and sourced critically but and sourced did not source think critically /5+5=10 reference did not source reference reference and did not material reference material material source appropriately material appropriately appropriately reference appropriately material appropriately approach for an explanation is an explanation an an an explanation the design clear, and the is clear, and explanation is explanation is is not clear, and /5+5=10 logic is the logic is mostly clear, mostly clear, the logic is not appropriate mostly and the logic and the logic is appropriate appropriate is mostly not appropriate appropriate ieee clear styles with clear generally sometimes lacks reference an excellent referencing good clear consistency style source of style referencing referencing with many /5 references. style style errors page 4 of 4 prepared by: dr sanjeeb shrestha moderated by: dr imran jokhio july 2022>