5 pts
Highest
Highly detailed paper demonstrating reading the source(s), understanding of issues involved, and accurate description of topic. Student indicates analysis and intentional reflection on reading material, such as by making specific arguments, using direct quotes (in quotation marks and cited), or by otherwise creatively applying the author’s work with specificity.
|
4 pts
High
Very minor flaws, but otherwise highly detailed paper demonstrating reading the source(s), understanding of issues involved, and accurate description of topic. Student indicates analysis and intentional reflection on reading material, such as by making specific arguments, using direct quotes (in quotation marks and cited), or by otherwise creatively applying the author’s work with specificity.
|
3 pts
Moderate
Moderately detailed description of topic demonstrating intentional reading/analysis, but with multiple flaws in description of topic.
|
2 pts
Insufficient
Insufficiently detailed description of topic, many flaws in description of topic. Surplus of writing that seems to waste space rather than move the reflection forward.
|
1 pts
Low
Little to no evidence of intentional reflection on material.
|