Subject name jndustry based capstone project
© MIT July, 2020 T2 2020 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines School School of Business Course Name Master of Professional Accounting Unit Code MA618 Unit Title Industry-based Capstone Project Trimester 2, 2020 Assessment Author Monica Jurin Assessment Type Individual Assessment Title Formative Assessment Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed: b. Work with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability to efficiently and effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning. Weighting 5% Total Marks 100 marks Word Limit 600 words Release Date Week 1 Due Date Week 3 Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date (as above) along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the Assessment Task, and listed appropriately at the end in a Reference List using APA 6th edition for the School of Business. https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/APA Extension / Special Consideration If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your Academic Management System (AMS) login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams. The Application for Special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3) working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking Special Consideration. In the case of serious illness, loss or bereavement, hardship or trauma students may be granted special consideration. Academic Misconduct Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute- publications/policies-procedures-and- guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/APA https://online.mit.edu.au/ams https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure MA618 Industry-Based Capstone Project Lasted Updated: July, 2020 Assessment Cover Sheet Student ID Number/s: Student Last name/s: Student First name/s: Course: School: Unit code: Unit title: Due date: Date submitted: Campus: Lecturer’s Name: Tutor: Student Declaration I/We declare and certify that: 1. the work contained in this assessment is my/our own work/group work, except where acknowledgement of sources is made; 2. this assessment has not been submitted previously for academic credit in this or any other course; 3. I/we have read MIT’s Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure, and I/we understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism, collusion and contract cheating; 4. a copy of the original assignment is retained by me/us and that I/we may be required to submit the original assignment to the Lecturer and/or Unit Co-ordinator upon request; I/we have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised collaboration or contract cheating when preparing this assessment. MIT ID Signature Date For Assessor Use Only (if not marked on Moodle) Name: Position Date: Signature: Marks/Grades: MA618 Industry-Based Capstone Project Lasted Updated: July, 2020 Assessment Task Description You are required to complete the following assessment. Based on the first two weeks of workshop you have attended, answer the following questions: 1. What challenge you may face when managing a client? Describe the scenario and propose a strategy to overcome the challenge. (300 words) 2. What issues you may face when working in a group? Propose a strategy how you can overcome or manage the issues. (300 words) Use business writing style with relevant vocabulary. Conduct your independent research and use APA referencing style. The marks allocated to each of the question above is equally weighted according to the breakdown marks in the marking criteria table below. Marking criteria: Assessment criteria are shown in the following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Assessment criteria to be met and assessed Detailed Description of the Assessment Criteria Breakdown Marks Criteria 1 Independent thinking skill 25 Criteria 2 Autonomous skill 25 Criteria 3 English writing skill 25 Criteria 4 Referencing 25 Total 100 Using Technology for Assessment Rationale Activities Technological tools selected reflection on learning feedback on performance practice of critical thinking, independent thinking, autonomous skill Reflective writing check for plagiarism problem-based learning scenario testing Turnitin © MIT July, 2020 T2 2020 Marking Rubric for Individual Assessment: Marking Rubric Criteria/ Grades High Distinction (HD) [Excellent] 80-100% Distinction (D) [Very Good] 70%-79% Credit (C) [Good] 60%-69% Pass (P) [Satisfactory] 50%-59% Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory] <50% criteria 1: independent thinking skills an excellent demonstration to observe, understand and analyse what was discussed in the workshops, relate to the current environment and formulate original ideas and opinions. a good demonstration to observe, understand and analyse what was discussed in the workshops, relate to the current environment and formulate some ideas and opinions. a general understanding and analysis of the topics discussed and formulate some ideas and opinions. an attempt to discuss topics some general ideas and opinions, but not well articulated. did not attempt to discuss the topics nor present any ideas and opinions. criteria 2: autonomous skills an excellent demonstration to conduct independent research, consider diverse viewpoints and articulate strong arguments. a good demonstration to conduct independent research, present a viewpoint and articulate an argument clearly. a general discussion of a viewpoint and an argument. an attempt to consider other viewpoints or opinions, but non- specific. did not consider any viewpoints or opinions. criteria 3: english writing skills an excellent demonstration of expression using proper and relevant vocabulary, free of spelling and grammatical errors. a good demonstration of expression using proper and relevant vocabulary, with minor spelling and grammatical errors. a general command of business writing skills with some spelling and grammatical errors. an attempt to write in business format but with extensive spelling and grammatical errors. illegible with extensive spelling and grammatical errors. criteria 4: referencing free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. commit one or more types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. ma618 industry-based capstone project lasted updated: july, 2020 *types of plagiarism or academic misconduct: sham paraphrasing material has been copied exactly from the source and has been acknowledged with an in-text citation but has not been quoted; there is a reference list. illicit paraphrasing material has been paraphrased from the source without any in-text citation; there is a reference list. exact copying material has been copied exactly from the source without any in-text citation; there is a reference list. no referencing there is no in-text citations nor a reference list. collusion material has been copied from another student’s work; recycling the same assignment submitted in more than one unit; contract cheating the assignment has been written by a third party and the students is claiming it as their own work. mark: overall feedback © mit july, 2020 t2 2020 assessment details and submission guidelines school school of business course name master of professional accounting unit code ma618 unit title industry-based capstone project trimester 2, 2020 assessment author monica jurin assessment type individual assessment title formative assessment unit learning outcomes addressed: b. work with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability to efficiently and effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning. weighting 5% total marks 100 marks word limit 600 words release date week 1 due date week 3 submission guidelines all work must be submitted on moodle by the due date (as above) along with a completed assignment cover page. the assignment must be in ms word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt calibri (body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. reference sources must be cited in the text of the assessment task, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using apa 6th edition for the school of business. https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/apa extension / special consideration if an extension of time to submit work is required, an application for special consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your academic management system (ams) login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams. the application for special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3) working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking special consideration. in the case of serious illness, criteria="" 1:="" independent="" thinking="" skills="" an="" excellent="" demonstration="" to="" observe,="" understand="" and="" analyse="" what="" was="" discussed="" in="" the="" workshops,="" relate="" to="" the="" current="" environment="" and="" formulate="" original="" ideas="" and="" opinions.="" a="" good="" demonstration="" to="" observe,="" understand="" and="" analyse="" what="" was="" discussed="" in="" the="" workshops,="" relate="" to="" the="" current="" environment="" and="" formulate="" some="" ideas="" and="" opinions.="" a="" general="" understanding="" and="" analysis="" of="" the="" topics="" discussed="" and="" formulate="" some="" ideas="" and="" opinions.="" an="" attempt="" to="" discuss="" topics="" some="" general="" ideas="" and="" opinions,="" but="" not="" well="" articulated.="" did="" not="" attempt="" to="" discuss="" the="" topics="" nor="" present="" any="" ideas="" and="" opinions.="" criteria="" 2:="" autonomous="" skills="" an="" excellent="" demonstration="" to="" conduct="" independent="" research,="" consider="" diverse="" viewpoints="" and="" articulate="" strong="" arguments.="" a="" good="" demonstration="" to="" conduct="" independent="" research,="" present="" a="" viewpoint="" and="" articulate="" an="" argument="" clearly.="" a="" general="" discussion="" of="" a="" viewpoint="" and="" an="" argument.="" an="" attempt="" to="" consider="" other="" viewpoints="" or="" opinions,="" but="" non-="" specific.="" did="" not="" consider="" any="" viewpoints="" or="" opinions.="" criteria="" 3:="" english="" writing="" skills="" an="" excellent="" demonstration="" of="" expression="" using="" proper="" and="" relevant="" vocabulary,="" free="" of="" spelling="" and="" grammatical="" errors.="" a="" good="" demonstration="" of="" expression="" using="" proper="" and="" relevant="" vocabulary,="" with="" minor="" spelling="" and="" grammatical="" errors.="" a="" general="" command="" of="" business="" writing="" skills="" with="" some="" spelling="" and="" grammatical="" errors.="" an="" attempt="" to="" write="" in="" business="" format="" but="" with="" extensive="" spelling="" and="" grammatical="" errors.="" illegible="" with="" extensive="" spelling="" and="" grammatical="" errors.="" criteria="" 4:="" referencing="" free="" of="" any="" types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct*.="" free="" of="" any="" types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct*.="" free="" of="" any="" types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct*.="" free="" of="" any="" types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct*.="" commit="" one="" or="" more="" types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct*.="" ma618="" industry-based="" capstone="" project="" lasted="" updated:="" july,="" 2020="" *types="" of="" plagiarism="" or="" academic="" misconduct:="" sham="" paraphrasing="" material="" has="" been="" copied="" exactly="" from="" the="" source="" and="" has="" been="" acknowledged="" with="" an="" in-text="" citation="" but="" has="" not="" been="" quoted;="" there="" is="" a="" reference="" list.="" illicit="" paraphrasing="" material="" has="" been="" paraphrased="" from="" the="" source="" without="" any="" in-text="" citation;="" there="" is="" a="" reference="" list.="" exact="" copying="" material="" has="" been="" copied="" exactly="" from="" the="" source="" without="" any="" in-text="" citation;="" there="" is="" a="" reference="" list.="" no="" referencing="" there="" is="" no="" in-text="" citations="" nor="" a="" reference="" list.="" collusion="" material="" has="" been="" copied="" from="" another="" student’s="" work;="" recycling="" the="" same="" assignment="" submitted="" in="" more="" than="" one="" unit;="" contract="" cheating="" the="" assignment="" has="" been="" written="" by="" a="" third="" party="" and="" the="" students="" is="" claiming="" it="" as="" their="" own="" work.="" mark:="" overall="" feedback="" ©="" mit="" july,="" 2020="" t2="" 2020="" assessment="" details="" and="" submission="" guidelines="" school="" school="" of="" business="" course="" name="" master="" of="" professional="" accounting="" unit="" code="" ma618="" unit="" title="" industry-based="" capstone="" project="" trimester="" 2,="" 2020="" assessment="" author="" monica="" jurin="" assessment="" type="" individual="" assessment="" title="" formative="" assessment="" unit="" learning="" outcomes="" addressed:="" b.="" work="" with="" a="" high="" level="" of="" personal="" autonomy="" and="" accountability="" to="" efficiently="" and="" effectively="" to="" complete="" project-based="" work="" integrated="" learning.="" weighting="" 5%="" total="" marks="" 100="" marks="" word="" limit="" 600="" words="" release="" date="" week="" 1="" due="" date="" week="" 3="" submission="" guidelines="" ="" all="" work="" must="" be="" submitted="" on="" moodle="" by="" the="" due="" date="" (as="" above)="" along="" with="" a="" completed="" assignment="" cover="" page.="" ="" the="" assignment="" must="" be="" in="" ms="" word="" format,="" 1.5="" spacing,="" 11-pt="" calibri="" (body)="" font="" and="" 2="" cm="" margins="" on="" all="" four="" sides="" of="" your="" page="" with="" appropriate="" section="" headings.="" ="" reference="" sources="" must="" be="" cited="" in="" the="" text="" of="" the="" assessment="" task,="" and="" listed="" appropriately="" at="" the="" end="" in="" a="" reference="" list="" using="" apa="" 6th="" edition="" for="" the="" school="" of="" business.="" https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/apa="" extension="" special="" consideration="" if="" an="" extension="" of="" time="" to="" submit="" work="" is="" required,="" an="" application="" for="" special="" consideration="" and="" supporting="" documentation="" must="" be="" submitted="" online="" via="" your="" academic="" management="" system="" (ams)="" login:="" https://online.mit.edu.au/ams.="" the="" application="" for="" special="" consideration="" must="" be="" submitted="" no="" later="" than="" three="" (3)="" working="" days="" after="" the="" due="" date="" of="" the="" specific="" piece="" of="" assessment="" or="" the="" examination="" for="" which="" you="" are="" seeking="" special="" consideration.="" in="" the="" case="" of="" serious="">50% criteria 1: independent thinking skills an excellent demonstration to observe, understand and analyse what was discussed in the workshops, relate to the current environment and formulate original ideas and opinions. a good demonstration to observe, understand and analyse what was discussed in the workshops, relate to the current environment and formulate some ideas and opinions. a general understanding and analysis of the topics discussed and formulate some ideas and opinions. an attempt to discuss topics some general ideas and opinions, but not well articulated. did not attempt to discuss the topics nor present any ideas and opinions. criteria 2: autonomous skills an excellent demonstration to conduct independent research, consider diverse viewpoints and articulate strong arguments. a good demonstration to conduct independent research, present a viewpoint and articulate an argument clearly. a general discussion of a viewpoint and an argument. an attempt to consider other viewpoints or opinions, but non- specific. did not consider any viewpoints or opinions. criteria 3: english writing skills an excellent demonstration of expression using proper and relevant vocabulary, free of spelling and grammatical errors. a good demonstration of expression using proper and relevant vocabulary, with minor spelling and grammatical errors. a general command of business writing skills with some spelling and grammatical errors. an attempt to write in business format but with extensive spelling and grammatical errors. illegible with extensive spelling and grammatical errors. criteria 4: referencing free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. free of any types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. commit one or more types of plagiarism or academic misconduct*. ma618 industry-based capstone project lasted updated: july, 2020 *types of plagiarism or academic misconduct: sham paraphrasing material has been copied exactly from the source and has been acknowledged with an in-text citation but has not been quoted; there is a reference list. illicit paraphrasing material has been paraphrased from the source without any in-text citation; there is a reference list. exact copying material has been copied exactly from the source without any in-text citation; there is a reference list. no referencing there is no in-text citations nor a reference list. collusion material has been copied from another student’s work; recycling the same assignment submitted in more than one unit; contract cheating the assignment has been written by a third party and the students is claiming it as their own work. mark: overall feedback © mit july, 2020 t2 2020 assessment details and submission guidelines school school of business course name master of professional accounting unit code ma618 unit title industry-based capstone project trimester 2, 2020 assessment author monica jurin assessment type individual assessment title formative assessment unit learning outcomes addressed: b. work with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability to efficiently and effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning. weighting 5% total marks 100 marks word limit 600 words release date week 1 due date week 3 submission guidelines all work must be submitted on moodle by the due date (as above) along with a completed assignment cover page. the assignment must be in ms word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt calibri (body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. reference sources must be cited in the text of the assessment task, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using apa 6th edition for the school of business. https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/apa extension / special consideration if an extension of time to submit work is required, an application for special consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your academic management system (ams) login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams. the application for special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3) working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking special consideration. in the case of serious illness,>